Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sukhalal N.P vs National Highways Authority Of ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7659 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7659 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2023

Kerala High Court
Sukhalal N.P vs National Highways Authority Of ... on 14 July, 2023
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
         FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1945
                        WP(C) NO. 19844 OF 2023
PETITIONER:

             SUKHALAL N.P,
             AGED 53 YEARS
             S/O PURUSHOTHAMAN, NIKARTHIL, CMC 35,CHERTHALA P.O.,
             ALAPPUZHA - 688 524.
             BY ADVS.
             S.KRISHNAMOORTHY
             SNEHA ROSE
             P.S.ARUNA


RESPONDENTS:

     1        NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
              REP BY DY GENERAL MANAGER CUM PROJECT DIRECTOR,
              NO.36/414(III), NEAR NSS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL,
              PALKULANGARA, TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695 024.
     2        THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
              COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 001.
     3        DEPUTY COLLECTOR(SPL)
              LA(NH), COMPETENT AUTHORITY COLLECTORATE,
              ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.
     4        SPECIAL TAHASILDAR,
              O/O SPECIAL TAHASILDAR LANH, CHERTHALA,
              ALAPPUZHA - 688 524.
     5        VILLAGE OFFICER,
              CHERTHALA NORTH VILLAGE, CHERTHALA,ALAPPUZHA - 688 524.


             SMT. DEEPA. V, G.P,
             SRI.B.G BIDAN CHANDRAN, SC


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 19844 OF 2023
                                  2

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the son of late Purushothaman. According to

the petitioner, late Purushothaman was the owner of an extent of 1.12

Ares of land in Sy No.122/2-2 of Cherthala North Village. According

to the petitioner, though the document of title shows only an extent

of 1.12 Ares, the late father of the petitioner was actually in

possession of 1.75 Ares. The petitioner claims that though the land

acquisition proceedings were initiated in respect of lands in Sy

No.122/1-5 (as per notification) factually it is the property of the

petitioner that has been acquired. According to the petitioner,

though the land of the petitioner has been completely acquired for

the purpose of development of National Highway - 66, in the

notification for acquisition of land, the Survey number was wrongly

mentioned as Sy.No.122/1-5 instead of Sy.No.122/2-2. It is the

submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that despite

producing all documents proving the claim of the petitioner and

other legal heirs of late Purushothaman to the land acquisition

compensation, the competent authority has not sanctioned the land

acquisition compensation citing the difference in the survey number

and in the extent. The leaned counsel submits that the petitioner will WP(C) NO. 19844 OF 2023

be satisfied if the land acquisition compensation in respect of 1.12

Ares of land is released as per the document of title. It is submitted

that the mentioning of the survey number Sy.No.122/1-5 in the land

acquisition notification can only be a mistake.

2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would

submit that the land acquisition compensation was not released to

the petitioner owing to the mistake in the survey number and the

dispute regarding the extent. However, it is not disputed that in

almost identical situations pursuant to directions issued by this

Court, land acquisition compensation has been released after

obtaining an undertaking that if any rival claim is made and it is

found that the said claimant is entitled to compensation, the person

who obtained the compensation will be required to refund the same.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner will produce a legal heirship certificate before the

competent authority and shall also execute undertakings by each of

the legal heirs of late Purushothaman undertaking to refund the

amount received as compensation if there are any rival claimants at

any later point of time. It is submitted that if the petitioner and

other legal heirs of late Purushothaman do not get the compensation

released, they will be put to great prejudice as their entire residential WP(C) NO. 19844 OF 2023

premises have already been acquired.

4. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Government Pleader and taking into account orders

passed by this Court in almost similar circumstances [Exts.P6(a) and

P6(b)], this writ petition will stand disposed of in the following

manner:-

i) The petitioner shall produce legal heirship certificate of late

Purushothaman before the competent authority. The amount of

compensation for 1.12 Ares of land shall be released to those found

entitled in terms of the legal heirship certificate, after obtaining a

suitable undertaking from them undertaking to refund the amounts

if any rival claim arises at some later point of time.

ii) The competent authority shall ensure that suitable endorsements

are made in the documents of title so as to ensure that the petitioner

does not claim any other land as being his in terms of the description

of the survey number in the title document and in the Revenue

Records. It is made clear that the entire amount of compensation

received by the petitioner and the other legal heirs will be liable to be

recovered if it were to be found that the land acquisition

compensation for the land which is subject matter of this writ WP(C) NO. 19844 OF 2023

petition is actually payable to any third party.

iii) The competent authority shall endeavour to complete the

proceedings, within a period of one month from date on which the

legal heirship certificate and the affidavits of undertaking are

produced before him.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 19844 OF 2023

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19844/2023

PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 2.06.2022 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 3 D OF THE NH ACT PUBLISHED IN MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY DATED 25/6/2022 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTIONS OF THE LAND REVENUE RECORDS BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 3(E)(1) OF THE NH ACT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10/4/2023 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P6(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 1/9/2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 24339/2022 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT Exhibit P6(b) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4/11/2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 31739/2022 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter