Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 764 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2023
WP(C) NO. 12958 OF 2013 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 22ND POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 12958 OF 2013
PETITIONER/S:
K.S.LATHEEF
S/O SYED MOHAMMED, FOUZIA MANZIL, ROSAPOOKANDAM,
KUMILY VILLAGE, PEERMADU TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.SURIN GEORGE IPE
SRI.S.SUDARSANAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, THODUPUZHA EAST, IDUKKI-
685586.
2 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H.SUB DIVISION, PEERMADE,
IDUKKI-685531.
3 BOBBY KURIEN
EDAYADIMALIYIL, PEROOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-
686637.
4 SIJO KURIAKOSE
KALLOOPPARA, CHAKKUPPALAM, 6TH MILE, IDUKKI
DISTRICT-685509.
5 THOMAS SAMUEL
CHERUPURAYATH, KODIKUTHY, PERUVANTHANAM, IDUKKI
DISTRICT-685532.
6 A.H.SHABEER
AZHUPURATH HOUSE, ROSAPOOKANADAM, KUMILY VILLAGE,
WP(C) NO. 12958 OF 2013 2
IDUKKI DISTRICT-685509.
BY ADVS.
SRI.JOSEPH JOHN, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA
SRI.T.K.BIJU MANJINIKARA
SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
SHRI.S.RAJMOHAN
SMT.V.M.RUSHDA
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.V.V.JOSHI, SC(KWA)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 12.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 12958 OF 2013 3
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 12958 of 2013
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 12th day of January, 2023
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
(i) To call for the records leading to award of work to respondents 3 to 6 by the 1st respondent relating to water pumping duty in Rural Water Supply Scheme (RWSS) under PH Section, Peermade and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.
(ii) To declare that the work of water pumping duty in Rural Water Supply Scheme (RWSS) under PH division, Peermade awarded by the 1s respondent to respondents 3 to 6 is illegal and irregular as the same does not confirm to the procedures as the tender is been done without notice and not in a competitive manner calling for open tenders and
(iii) Grant such other orders or directions as may be deemed necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice." [SIC]
2. There is no representation for the petitioner. The
learned counsel for the Water Authority and the learned
counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 3 to 5 also submitted
that the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous. The
counsel for the Water Authority also submitted that the
petitioner has not participated in the bid. In such
circumstances, nothing survives in this case.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!