Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Binu Somarajan vs Indrajith
2023 Latest Caselaw 638 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 638 Ker
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2023

Kerala High Court
Binu Somarajan vs Indrajith on 12 January, 2023
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                                     &
                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
         Thursday, the 12th day of January 2023 / 22nd Pousha, 1944
                 IA.NO.1/2023 IN MAT.APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2022
            OP(OTHERS) 466/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA, KOLLAM
PETITIONER/APPELLANT:

     BINU SOMARAJAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.SOMARAJAN, THARAMEL VEEDU,
     SOORANADU NORTH, KUNNATHOOR TALUK, WORKING AT AMIAS HOLDING, COMPANY
     LIMITED, BURAIDHA STREET, HAI-AL RAYYAN, RIYATH, KSA REPRESENTED BY
     HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, REJI.S, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.SUDHAKARAN,
     KUNNAYYATHU PADEETTATHIL, ALUMKADAVU P.O, NAMBARUVIKALA,
     KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690573.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

  1. INDRAJITH, AGED 19 YEARS, S/O.BINU SOMARAJAN & JINI RAJ, LILAK
     (PALESSERIL), MANAPPALLY SOUTH MURI, PAVUMBA VILLAGE,KARUNAGAPPALLY
     TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690518.
  2. INDRAJA, AGED 16 YEARS, D/O. BINU SOMARAJAN & JINI RAJ, LILAK
     (PALESSERIL), MANAPPALLY SOUTH MURI, PAVUMBA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY
     TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690518 (MINOR REPRESENTED BY THE 3RD
     RESPONDENT HER MOTHER).
  3. JINI RAJ, AGED 39 YEARS, D/O.RAJAN, LILAK (PALESSERIL), MANAPPALLY
     SOUTH MURI, PAVUMBA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT -
     690518.


     Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to direct the Family
Court, Chavara to release the attachment of the term deposit in
E.A.No.100/2022 in E.P.26/2022 so as to enable the judgment debtor to
withdraw and deposit the required amount to comply with the interim order
dated 29.11.2022 in IA No.1/2022 in Mat.Appeal No.708/2022 in the interest
of justice.


     This Application coming on for orders, upon perusing the application
and the affidavit filed in support thereof, and upon hearing the arguments
of M/S.K.SIJU, S.ABHILASH and ANJANA KANNATH, Advocates for the
applicants, and of M/S.UMMUL FIDA, C.IJLAL, JAI GOVIND M.J. and NIMMY
JOHNSON Advocates for the respondents, the court passed the following:




                                                                 p.t.o.
        ANIL K. NARENDRAN & P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
    -----------------------------------------------------------
                        I.A.No.1 of 2023
                                 in
                 Mat.Appeal No.708 of 2022
    -----------------------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 12th day of January, 2023

                            ORDER

P.G.Ajithkumar, J.

The appellant has filed this petition seeking to issue a

direction to the Family Court, Chavara to withdraw attachment

as per the order in E.A.No.100 of 2022 in E.P.No.26 of 2022 in

O.P.No.466 of 2017 in respect of a term deposit made by him.

As per the order dated 29.11.2022 in I.A.No.1 of 2022 this

Court granted interim stay of execution of the decree in

O.P.No.466 of 2017 on condition that the appellant shall deposit

50% of the total decree debt.

The petitioner-appellant would contend that an amount of

Rs.18 lakhs is due from the appellant to the respondents as per

the impugned decree. The Family Court ordered to attach Rs.30

lakhs, which was deposited by the petitioner in a fixed deposit

account in the joint name of himself and the minor child with the

Federal Bank, Thamarakulam Branch. He has liability to pay a

I.A.No.1 of 2023 in Mat.Appeal No.708 of 2022

term loan also. In such circumstances the petitioner seeks a

direction to the Family Court as pointed above, so that he can

comply with the direction of this Court.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and

the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

The attachment was ordered by the Family Court taking

into account the circumstances obtained in E.P.No.26 of 2022.

Therefore, it is appropriate to leave the request of the petitioner

made in this petition to be decided by the Family Court.

Therefore, this petition is disposed of granting extension of one

month from today to make the deposit as per the order dated

29.11.2022 and directing the Family Court to take a decision, if

the petitioner files an application for withdrawing attachment in

respect of the deposit, in whole or part, the petitioner claimed to

have made in the name of himself and the minor children.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE dkr

12-01-2023 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter