Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 424 Ker
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 21ST POUSHA,
1944
OP(CRL.) NO. 568 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER IN MP NO.28/2019 IN MC NO.8/2019 OF
FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 06.02.2020
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
JAISON PETER
AGED 44 YEARS
S/O. LATE PETER,
PALLIYAN HOUSE, PADIVATTOM,
EDAPALLY PO, KOCHI,
PIN - 682025
BY ADVS.
V.R.GOPU
ADIL.M.H
URMILA.M.G
RESPONDENT/S:
1 LEALIN JOB
AGED 35 YEARS
D/O.K.V.JOHN, ,
KAITHAKAACHIRA HOUSE, ERAMALLORE.P.O.,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA,
NOW RESIDING AT
SHALOM APARTMENTS, 1ST FLOOR,
NEAR RELIANCE FRESH, PONNURUNNI,
VYTTILA.P.O., KOCHI-682019.
, PIN - 682019
2 ISHA ANN MARY,
D/O.JAISON PETER
AGED 9 YEARS
MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN
LEALIN JOB, KAITHAKAACHIRA HOUSE,
ERAMALLORE.P.O., CHERTHALA,
ALAPPUZHA, NOW RESIDING AT
O.P.(Crl.)No.568 of 2022
..2..
SHALOM APARTMENTS, 1ST FLOOR,
NEAR RELIANCE FRESH, PONNURUNNI,
VYTTILA.P.O., KOCHI-682019
BY SMT.P.SAREENA GEORGE,
SRI.RENJIT GEORGE, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 11.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O.P.(Crl.)No.568 of 2022
..3..
A.BADHARUDEEN, J.
--------------------------------------------------------
O.P.(Crl.)No.568 of 2022
--------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2023
JUDGMENT
This original petition has been filed under Article
227 of the Constitution of India, challenging Ext.P2 order
whereby, the learned Family court, Ernakulam granted interim
maintenance to the tune of Rs.4,000/- per month to the
second respondent minor herein.
2. Heard both sides. Adv.Smt.P.Sareena George
appeared for the respondents.
3. On perusal of Ext.P2 order, the same is to the
following effect:
"Respondent to pay Rs.4,000/- per month as interim maintenance for the time being. Counter and hearing-12.05.2020."
O.P.(Crl.)No.568 of 2022 ..4..
4. Although the order is not exhaustive, the
same would depict that the order was passed before filing
counter. Since the order is not a speaking one, I am
inclined to set aside the order to remand the matter for
fresh consideration by the Family Court, after considering
the counter, if any, at the instance of the petitioner also.
5. In the meantime, it is specifically ordered
that the petitioner shall pay interim maintenance at the rate
of Rs.3,500/- per month to the second respondent minor till
a final decision is taken in the interim petition from the date
of the petition and clear the arrears within a period of thirty
days. On failure to do so, coercive steps can go on.
In the result, this original petition is disposed of
as indicated above.
Sd/-
A.BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE rkj O.P.(Crl.)No.568 of 2022 ..5..
APPENDIX OF OP(CRL.) 568/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION IN M.P.NO.28/2019 IN M.C.NO.8/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 7.1.2019 EXHIBIT P2 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.2.2020 IN M.P.NO.28/2019 IN M.C.NO.8/2019 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!