Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 168 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 381 OF 2023
PETITIONER/S:
ANILKUMAR
AGED 51 YEARS
SON OF VASU NAIR, KOORIYATTIL HOUSE, ARYANBAVU,
ARIYUR, KOTTOPPADAM, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD., PIN -
678583
BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, CIVIL STATION P.O.,
PALAKKAD., PIN - 678002
2 THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER
SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MANNARKKAD P.O.,
MANNARKKAD., PIN - 678583
3 AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LIMITED, SHORNUR ROAD,
THRISSUR., PIN - 680001
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. JIMMY GEORGE, GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
W.P.(C). No. 381 of 2023
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
======================================================
W.P.(C) No.381 of 2023
=============================================================
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2023
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writs, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent Joint Regional Transport Officer, Mannarkkad to consider Ext.P4 objection submitted by the petitioner as regarding to the taking of possession of vehicle KL 50 G 8233 before considering the question of issuance of fresh Registration Certificate in the name of the financier.
ii. To grant such other reliefs as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper." (sic)
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the
counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will be satisfied if a
direction is issued to consider Ext.P4 objection submitted by the
petitioner as regarding the taking possession of vehicle KL-50/G-
8233 before considering the question of issuance of fresh
registration certificate.
W.P.(C). No. 381 of 2023
3. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Government
Pleader. No notice is necessary to the 3 rd respondent at this stage.
If the 3rd respondent is aggrieved by any of the directions in this
judgment, 3rd respondent is free to file a review petition.
4. After hearing both sides, I am of the opinion that there
can be a direction to consider Ext.P4. But I make it clear that I
have not considered the matter on merit and the 2 nd respondent is
free to pass appropriate orders, after giving notice to the 3 rd
respondent. All the legal contentions raised by the petitioner in
this writ petition are left open and the same shall be considered
by the 2nd respondent at the time of hearing.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2 nd
respondent to consider Ext.P4 objection and pass appropriate
orders in it, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner and the 3rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at
W.P.(C). No. 381 of 2023
any rate, before issuing fresh RC to the 3 rd respondent, if not
already issued.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das
W.P.(C). No. 381 of 2023
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 381/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE OF THE VEHICLE KL 50 G 8233 DATED 9.11.2018.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 22.6.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH ENGLISH TRANSALATION.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT HAVING NO.A/645/P..M. DATED 24.12.2022 WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 30.12.2022.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!