Jose vs Mookkannoor Grama Panchayath ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 1331 Ker

WP(C) NO. 32212 OF 2013             1



                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
   WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 28TH POUSHA, 1944
                          WP(C) NO. 32212 OF 2013
PETITIONER/S:

               JOSE
               S/O.VARKEY, INCHACKA PALATTY HOUSE, MOOKKANNOOR 683
               577, ANGAMALY VIA, ERNAKULAM

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.PRAMOD J.DEV
               SRI.V.P.JOLY



RESPONDENT/S:

      1        MOOKKANNOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS
               SECRETARY
               MOOKKANNOOR 683 577, ANGAMALY VIA, ERNAKULAM

      2        THE VILLAGE OFFICER
               MOOKKANNOOR VILLAGE, MOOKKANNOOR 683 577, ANGAMALY
               VIA, ERNAKULAM.

      3        SIJU.P.OUSEPH
               S/O.,OUSEPH, PUTHUSSERY HOUSE, MOKKANNOOR 638 577,
               ANGAMALY VIA, ERNAKULAM

      4        STATE OF KERALA
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT,
               LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

               BY ADVS.
               SRI.V.M.ALI
               SRI.V.M.KURIAN
               SRI.SABU P.JOSEPH
 WP(C) NO. 32212 OF 2013                 2




OTHER PRESENT:

               SRI.K.M.FAISAL, GP




       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON   18.01.2023,          THE   COURT   ON   THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 32212 OF 2013            3




                      P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
                 --------------------------------------------
                     W.P.(C.) No. 32212 of 2013
                    --------------------------------------
              Dated this the 18th day of January, 2022


                              JUDGMENT

The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers

in the writ petition are infructuous.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

SD/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS