Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 132 Ker
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 16TH POUSHA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 10586 OF 2022
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:
REDHURAJ A R
AGED 47 YEARS
S/O. RAJAGOPAL
ARAMAM BUNGLOW, KADAPPA,
MYNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM - 690519, PIN - 690519
BY ADVS.
SRUTHY K.K
P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)
P.M.RAFIQ
M.REVIKRISHNAN
AJEESH K.SASI
SRUTHY N. BHAT
RAHUL SUNIL
NIKITA J. MENDEZ
RESPONDENT/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, PIN - 682031
OTHER PRESENT:
PP:SEETHA S
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
06.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
B.A. No.10586 of 2022 2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
-------------------
B.A. No.10586 of 2022
-----------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2023
ORDER
Application for anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.1008
of 2022 of Kollam East Police Station, Kollam
registered alleging commission of offences
punishable under Sections 468, 471, 420 and 34 of
IPC.
3. The prosecution allegation is that, the
applicant being the previous Chief Cashier of Kollam
Corporation, who was in charge of the Custody of
Term Deposit Receipts submitted by various
contractors in the Corporation, in furtherance of
the common intention with other accused in the above
Crime, released the FD receipts in the names of the
Contractors who are arrayed as accused Nos. 3 to 5
in the above Crime, by forging signature of the
Superintending Engineer in the receipts together
with releasing notes and the amounts released by the
Contractors in the treasury during the period
between 26-04-2021 and 02-08- 2022. Thereby, the
applicant and others cheated the Corporation and
caused pecuniary loss to the Corporation by forging
the documents and thus the petitioner has committed
the above said offences.
4. The petitioner submits that he has not
committed the said offences as alleged. In fact the
petitioner was not working in the Section concerned
of the Corporation at the relevant point of time.
As regards the prosecution allegation, the amount
was released on 26.4.2021 and 2.8.2022. In fact the
petitioner was transferred from the office on
17.2.2021. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner
submits that the contractor who is arrayed as 3 rd
accused has already been granted anticipatory bail
by the Sessions Court as per Annexure-4 order.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Public Prosecutor.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the
application for bail mainly contending that the
signature and seal of the Superintending Engineer,
Kollam Corporation was forged and fake releasing
notices were produced at District Treasury, Kollam
as genuine and subsequently, the 3rd accused
withdraw an amount of Rs.7,000/-. Learned Public
Prosecutor further submitted that the petitioner
has no other criminal antecedents.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of
the case, and nature of the allegations, I am of the
opinion that custodial interrogation is not required
for the purpose of investigation and only a limited
custody be granted for the same. I am inclined to
grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but on
stringent conditions. The above bail application is
allowed with the following directions. The
petitioner shall surrender before the investigating
officer on 12.01.2023 and make himself available for
interrogation on that day or on any other day/days
and time as directed by the investigating officer.
The petitioner shall co-operate with the
investigation. In the event of arrest of the
petitioner in Crime No.1008 of 2022 of
Kollam East Police Station, he shall be produced
before the jurisdictional Court on the same day and
be released on bail on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.1008 of 2022 of Kollam East Police Station, on every Saturday at 11 am, till the final report is filed and also appear as and when summoned to do so;
(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence;
(iv) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted with him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(v) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated,
the Investigating Officer in Crime No.1008 of 2022
of Kollam East Police Station, may file an
application before the jurisdictional court for
cancellation of bail.
It is made clear that it is within the power of
the police to investigate the matter and if
necessary to effect recoveries on the information if
any given by the petitioner even when the petitioner
is on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court in
Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi)
and another (2020 (1) KHC 663).
sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM,JUDGE
pm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!