Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Alice Joseph vs State Of Kerala
2023 Latest Caselaw 1137 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1137 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023

Kerala High Court
Alice Joseph vs State Of Kerala on 18 January, 2023
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                            PRESENT
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
 WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 28TH POUSHA, 1944
                    WP(C) NO. 32952 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

          ALICE JOSEPH
          AGED 62 YEARS,W/O.K.V.JOSEPH,
          KOLLASSERIL HOUSE,
          PALLIPPURATHUSSERY KARA,
          VAIKOM VILLAGE,
          KOTTAYAM - 686 606.

          BY ADVS.
          GEORGE T.J
          ALICIA JOSE
          BABY THOMAS
          K.ANIL JOSEPH
          MARIAMMA JOSEPH

RESPONDENTS:
    1     STATE OF KERALA
          REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
          DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
          GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

    2     THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
          COLLECTORATE P.O.,
          KOTTAYAM - 686 002.

    3     REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
          CIVIL STATION, PALA,
          KOTTAYAM - 686 575.

    4     THE TAHSILDAR
          KOTTAYAM TALUK,
          MINI CIVIL STATION,
          KOTTAYAM - 686 001.

    5     VILLAGE OFFICER
          ATHIRAMPUZHA VILLAGE,
          KOTTAYAM - 686 562.
                                    2

WP(C) No. 32952 of 2022




      6        THE SECRETARY
               ATHIRAMPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
               ATHIRAMPUZHA,
               KOTTAYAM - 686 562.

               BY ADV SHRI.VARUGHESE M EASO, SC.


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 18.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                      3

WP(C) No. 32952 of 2022



                             JUDGMENT

Dated this the 18th day of January, 2023

The petitioner is before this Court aggrieved by the omission

of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar in entertaining an application

submitted by the petitioner for re-assessment of rate of Basic Tax

of land and for making necessary entries in the Basic Tax

Register.

2. The petitioner is owner of 50 Cents of property in

Survey Nos.155/14-2, 155/14-3 of Athirampuzha Village in

Kottayam District. The petitioner approached the District Collector

invoking the provisions of the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967

seeking to permit to use the land for non-agricultural purposes.

The District Collector passed Ext.P3 order under Clause 6 of the

Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967 permitting to use the land for

non-agricultural purposes.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that even though

Ext.P3 order was passed under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order,

1967 in the year 2005, the land of the petitioner is not re-assessed

WP(C) No. 32952 of 2022

for fixing rate of Basic Tax and the property of the petitioner is still

described as paddy land in the Revenue records. The petitioner

submitted Ext.P8 application invoking Section 6(3) of the Kerala

Land Tax Act, 1961 seeking to re-assess the Basic Tax and to

make necessary entries in the Basic Tax Register. The Tahsildar,

however, has not passed any orders on the application. Hence,

the petitioner has approached this Court.

4. The Government Pleader entered appearance on

behalf of the respondents and resisted the writ petition. The

Government Pleader controverted all the material allegations

made by the petitioner in the writ petition. It is submitted that

Ext.P3 proceedings are of the year 2005. The veracity and the

genuineness of Ext.P3 proceedings under the Kerala Land

Utilisation Order, 1967 are liable to be verified. The present status

of the land will also have to be ascertained, before re-assessment

of Basic Tax under the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents.

WP(C) No. 32952 of 2022

6. This Court has considered the issue of reassessment of

land tax on the basis of the orders obtained under the Kerala Land

Utilisation Order, 1967 in the judgment in Mary Abraham v. State

of Kerala and others [2020 (4) KLT 448]. This Court held that

once enabling order is passed under Rule 6(2) of the Kerala Land

Utilisation Order, 1967 permitting conversion of the land, then the

earlier entries in the BTR showing the land as Nilam, Paddy Land,

etc. will become superfluous and redundant and the competent

Revenue officials like the Tahsildar are obliged under law to make

a fresh assessment of the property under Section 6A of the Kerala

Land Tax Act, 1961.

7. A Division Bench of this Court also considered the

issue in District Collector, Ernakulam and others v. Fr.Jose

Uppani and others [2020 (4) KLT 612] and the Division Bench

held that when an applicant has secured orders under the Kerala

Land Utilisation Order prior to the cut-off date on which Section

27A was introduced to the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land

and Wetland Act, 2008, the competent Revenue officials are

WP(C) No. 32952 of 2022

bound to consider the subsequent application submitted under the

provisions of the Kerala Land Tax Act, 1961.

8. As the nature of the land of the petitioner has been

permitted to be changed pursuant to passing of a statutory order

under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967, the competent

authority is bound to re-assess the rate of Basic Tax in respect of

the land and to make necessary entries in the Basic Tax Register,

if necessary, after verifying the veracity/genuineness of the

permission obtained under the Kerala Land Utilisation Order, 1967

produced by the petitioner.

The writ petition is therefore allowed. The 4 th respondent is

directed to consider Ext.P8 Form-A application submitted by the

petitioner, in accordance with law, and pass appropriate orders

thereon within a period of one month. The petitioner shall produce

a copy of the writ petition and certified copy of this judgment

before the 4th respondent.

Sd/-

N. NAGARESH JUDGE ams

WP(C) No. 32952 of 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 32952/2022

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.3390/2004 OF ETTUMANOOR SRO.

Exhibit P2                PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE LAND.
Exhibit P3                TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF      THE   DISTRICT
                          COLLECTOR DATED 20/02/2005.
Exhibit P4                TRUE COPY OF THE NOC ISSUED BY ATHIRAMPUZHA
                          GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 21/12/2004.
Exhibit P5                TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPROVED

BY R6 VIDE LETTER NO.A2-402/04.05 DATED 23/12/2004.

Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING REMITTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION FEE.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE FORM A SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM TALUK Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TAHSILDAR, KOTTAYAM TALUK ON 06/01/2023 Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT BEARING NO. KA -472580/23 ISSUED BY THE TAHSILDAR TO THE PETITIONER ON 09/01/2023

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter