Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1134 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 28TH POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 35794 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1 GURUKRIPA MICRO FINANCE SELF HELP GROUP
NO. 1827/18/W/12, BUDHANOOR P.O., CHENGANNUR TALUK,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY CONVENER SREEDEVI AGED
44, W/O. BIJU, RESIDING AT LEKSHMI NIVAS, BUDHANOOR P.O.,
ENNAKKADU VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN- 689510.
2 SREEDEVI
AGED 44, W/O BIJU, RESIDING AT LEKSHMI NIVAS, BUDHANOOR
P.O., ENNAKKADU VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA
DISTRICT, PIN -689510.
3 MINIKUMARI,
AGED 45 YEARS, W/O SURENDREN P.R., ADARSH BHAVAN, ENNAKKADU
VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN 689510.
BY ADV K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN(THIRUVALLA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA
COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT -PIN-688001
2 THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R),
CHENGANUR TALUK, CHENGANNUR TALUK OFFICE, CHENGANNUR,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN- 689121
3 THE BRANCH MANAGER,
UNION BANK OF INDIA, CHENGANNUR TALUK OFFICE, CHENGANNUR,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689121
4 SREE NARAYANA DHARMA PARIPALANA YOGAM,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, CHENGANNUR UNION,
CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-689121.
5 ANU C.SENEN,
AGD 48 YEARS, S/O. CHANDRASENAN, KOTTAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, AALA
P.O., ALA VILLAGE, CHENGANNUR ,ALAPUZHA DISTRICT,
PIN-689 126
6 K.SANTHOSH,
AGED 50 YEARS, S/O KARUNAKARAN, VALLIYODAPARAMBIL HOUSE,
ERAMATHOOR PO., MANNAR VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN-688
537
7 V.SURENDREN,
VALIYAMALAYIL HOUSE, VENMONI P.O., VENMONI VILLAGE,
CHENGANNUR TALUK, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT,PIN-689509
W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
2
BY ADVS.
RIYAL DEVASSY, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
ASP.KURUP
SADCHITH.P.KURUP(K/1419/2002)
C.P.ANIL RAJ(K/872/2007)
SIVA SURESH(K/2688/2022)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 18th day of January, 2023
The 1st petitioner is a Self Help Group formed
for promoting the welfare activities of women
belonging to Ezhava community and is attached to
the Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam
(SNDP). The 2nd petitioner is the Convenor and the
3rd petitioner, the Joint Convenor of the Self Help
Group. The 1st petitioner availed a loan of Rs.3 lakhs
from the Union Bank of India. As directed by the
SNDP Union, the loan amount was repaid to the
Union on the understanding that the amount would
be remitted by the Union to the Bank. Contrary to
the understanding, the amount paid by the 1 st
petitioner and other Self Help Groups were
embezzled and no amount was remitted to the bank.
This resulted in the bank initiating recovery
measures against the petitioners. The petitioners
allege that the title deeds given to the bank as W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
security for the loan was misused by availing
another loan. On being alerted about the fraud, the
petitioners filed Ext.P2 complaint, based on which
Crime is registered against the office bearers of the
SNDP union as well as the officers of the Union Bank
of India. This writ petition is filed, aggrieved by
continuance of the recovery measures.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and
the learned Standing Counsel for the bank.
3. It is pointed out that, writ petitions filed by
similarly placed Self Help Groups seeking identical
reliefs were disposed of by Ext.R3 (A) judgment.
4. Having carefully gone through Ext.R3(A)
judgment, I find that the grievance highlighted by
the petitioners have been substantially dealt with
and the following directions issued;
"1. The petitioners are free to challenge the recovery proceedings against them, in accordance to law, by availing the alternative remedy. To facilitate the petitioners to avail the alternative remedy, revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioners in these cases are stayed for a period of three W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
months from today. During the above period, the petitioners can do the needful to avail the alternative remedy.
2. The petitioners in these cases can approach the jurisdictional Station House Officer concerned with a complaint narrating their grievance, if no criminal case is registered in connection with their grievance. If such a complaint is received the Station House Officer concerned will do the needful, in accordance to law.
3. The petitioners can approach the State Police Chief with a representation to investigate the criminal cases registered in connection with these cases by constituting a Special Team and if such a representation is received, the State Police Chief will do the needful, in accordance to law.
4. If any of the cases registered based on the complaint of the petitioners are reached the stage of trial, the aggrieved party/prosecution witnesses in those cases can approach the jurisdictional Court with a petition for an early disposal of those cases and if such a petition is received, the jurisdictional Court will try to expedite the trial and will conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible."
6. Learned Counsel for the petitioners
submitted that the crimes are now being W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
investigated by the Crime Branch, based on the
direction in Ext.P4 judgment. It is also submitted
that the time limit of three months granted in
Ext.R3(A) judgment will not be sufficient for
instituting a civil suit.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, with
the following directions;
i. The petitioners are free to challenge the
recovery proceedings against them, in
accordance to law, by availing the alternative
remedy. To facilitate the petitioners to avail
the alternative remedy, the revenue recovery
proceedings initiated at the instance of the
Bank is stayed for a period of six months
from today.
ii. The petitioners can approach the
jurisdictional Station House Officer or the
Crime Branch officer in charge of the
investigation for expediting the investigation.
The needful shall thereupon be done by the W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
officer concerned.
iii. If the case registered based on the
complaint of the petitioners have reached the
stage of trial, the aggrieved party/prosecution
witnesses in the case can approach the
jurisdictional Court with a petition for early
disposal of the case. If such a petition is
received, the jurisdictional Court shall try to
expedite the trial and dispose the case, as
expeditiously as possible.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN JUDGE NB/18-1 W.P.(C)NO.35794 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35794/2022
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE PASS BOOK ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT UNION EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO STATE POLICE CHIEF DATED 14.07.2018 EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 11.01.2021 ISSUED TO ALL MEMBERS OF FIRST PETITIONER MICROFINANCE UNIT, BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 THE COPY OF JUDGEMENT IN WPC NO.31710/2014 DATED 15.01.2016 EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 11.10.2022 IN WP(C) NO. 32156 OF 2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT R3A COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 16.2.2022 PASSED IN WPC NO. 2335/2019 EXHIBIT R3B COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 22.8.2022 PASSED IN WPC NO. 26695/2022
TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!