Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Naseema Kabeer vs Beepathumma
2023 Latest Caselaw 2170 Ker

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2170 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023

Kerala High Court
Naseema Kabeer vs Beepathumma on 10 February, 2023
                                 1
OP(C) No.197 of 2023


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                              PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
   FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 21ST MAGHA, 1944
                       OP(C) NO. 197 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT in IA No.925/2022 in OS 371/2011
                 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD
PETITIONER/S:

     1     NASEEMA KABEER,AGED 76 YEARS,/O M. AHAMMED KABEER,
           RESIDING AT APPLE PHOTO HOUSE, SWATHI JUNCTION,
           ALATHUR TOWN, TALUK, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678541
     2     MANOJ KABEER,AGED 54 YEARS,S/O M. AHAMMED KABEER,
           RESIDING AT APPLE PHOTO HOUSE, SWATHI JUNCTION,
           ALATHUR TOWN, TALUK, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678541
     3     MERLIYA FAIZAL,AGED 53 YEARS,W/O FAIZAL & D/O M.
           AHAMMED KABEER, RESIDING AT ROSE VILLA, FAROOK,
           KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673631
           BY ADVS.
           P.G.JAYASHANKAR
           P.K.RESHMA (KALARICKAL)
           S.RAJEEV (K/001711/2019)
           SAJANA V.H
           VINITHA S.T.
           RUBY K. ROY


RESPONDENT/S:

     1     BEEPATHUMMA,AGED 74 YEARS,W/O A. MUSTAFFA & D/O
           MOHAMMEDKUTTY, ANTHU PARAMBIL HOUSE, VIYYUR,
           THRISSUR, PIN - 680010
     2     BALKHEESE,AGED 73 YEARS,W/O (L) M. ABDUL KAREEM &
           D/O MOHAMMEDKUTTY, HOUSEWIFE, NAMBOOTHIRI MADOM,
           CHANDAPURA, VADAKKENADA, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR, PIN
           - 680664
     3     KADEEJA BEGAM,AGED 72 YEARS,W/O.(L) M. ABDUL SAMAD
           & D/O MOHAMMEDKUTTY, RESIDING AT TC 35/372 V.G.157,
           NEW HOUSE, VALLAKKADAVU P.O, VALIYATHURA,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695007
     4     SOWRIYATH,AGED 68 YEARS,W/O N. SHAFEEK & D/O
           MOHAMMEDKUTTY, RESIDING AT MANAPPURAM BENGLOW,
           MANAYIKULANGARA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691003
     5     RUKKIYA,AGED 71 YEARS,W/O YUSUFF KUNJU, RESIDING
                                2
OP(C) No.197 of 2023

           A.S. BUILDINGS, PALAYAPETTA, PALAKKAD - 678 001,
           AND PRESENTLY C/O MRS. KADEEJA BEGUM, TC 35/372,
           V.G.157, NEW HOUSE, VALLAKKADAVU P.O, VALIYATHURA,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695007
     6     JUMAILATH,AGED 59 YEARS,W/O MAJEED (L), ZEENATH
           MANZIL, PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 691004
     7     THEHAMIN,AGED 39 YEARS,D/O MAJEED (L), ZEENATH
           MANZIL, PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 691004
     8     AYSHA,AGED 29 YEARS,D/O MAJEED (L), ZEENATH MANZIL,
           PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 691004
     9     THAHAJAN,AGED 32 YEARS,D/O MAJEED (L), ZEENATH
           MANZIL, PUNTHALATHAZHAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 691004
    10     FARISA,AGED 69 YEARS,W/O SULAIMAN (L), RESIDING AT
           DOOR NO. 180, 4TH CROSS, GAYATHRIPURAM, 2ND STAGE,
           UDAYAGIRI, MYSORE, AND PRESENTLY RESIDING AT #96,
           2ND CROSS, 2ND STAGE, UDAYAGIRI, MYSORE, KARNATAKA,
           PIN - 590019
    11     PARVIN,AGED 52 YEARS,D/O SULAIMAN, (L), RESIDING AT
           DOOR NO. 180, 4TH CROSS GAYATHRIPURAM, 2ND STAGE,
           UDAYAGIRI, MYSORE, KARNATAKA, AND PRESENTLY
           RESIDING AT #96, 2ND CROSS, 2ND STAGE, UDAYAGIRI,
           MYSORE, KARNATAKA, PIN - 590019
    12     MOHAMMED RAFI,AGED 65 YEARS,S/O AHAMED KABEER, MARK
           HOUSE, POST OFFICE ROAD, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD,
           PRESENTLY RESIDING AT MARK HOUSE, CHANDRANAGAR,
           PALAKKAD, PIN - 678007
    13     DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,VAZHUTHACAUD,
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695014
    14     DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,MUNICIPAL COMPLEX,
           ROBINSON ROAD, OPPOSITE GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, SANTHI
           NAGAR, SULTANPET, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678014
    15     DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,KENATHUPARAMBU,
           KUNATHURMEDU, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001
    16     A. NOORJAHAN,AGED 64 YEARS,W/O BAPU D/O V. AHAMED
           KABEER, GOLDEN MALABAR BUILDING, KALLAYI ROAD,
           OPPOSITE PUSHPA THEATRE, KOZHIKODE, PRESENTLY
           RESIDING AT FLAT NO 9E, GOLDEN OAK APARTMENTS,
           MALABAR BUILDERS, NEAR OLD PUSHPA THEATER JUNCTION,
           KALLAI ROAD, CALICUT, PIN - 673002
    17     A. MUMTAZ,AGED 63 YEARS,W/O NEWMAN & D/O AHAMED
           KABEER, RESIDING AT C/O DR. ABDUL SHUKKOOR,
           KIZHAKKEVEEDU, VANUR ROAD, ALATHUR, ALATHUR TALUK,
           PALAKKAD, PIN - 678541
    18     A. ASHRAF,AGED 59 YEARS,S/O V. AHAMED KABEER,
           EMPLOYED IN HAJI HASSAIN ALIREZ COMPANY, P.B. NO.
           40, MAIN SECTION RING ROAD BRANCH, JEDDAH, SAUDI
           ARABIA, PIN - 21411
                                   3
OP(C) No.197 of 2023

    19       M. AZAD,AGED 57 YEARS,S/O V. AHAMED KABEER,
             BUSINESS, PLACKAL VILLA, CHAKKALA MUKKU, SREE
             KARIYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT
             OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL,
             ALATHUR, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678541
    20       A. SHANAVAZ,AGED 55 YEARS,S/O V. AHAMED KABEER,
             EDAPARAMBU, BANK ROAD, ALATHUR, ALATHUR TALUK,
             PALAKKAD, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT OLD POST OFFICE
             ROAD, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD,
             PIN - 678541
    21       SAJEEDA NOUSHAD,AGED 59 YEARS,W/O A. NOUSHAD, OMF
             COMPOUND, BANK ROAD, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD, PIN -
             678541
    22       KADEEJA JASHIR,AGED 26 YEARS,D/O A. NOUSHAD, OMF
             COMPOUND, BANK ROAD, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD, PIN -
             678541
    23       KABEER NOUSHAD,AGED 23 YEARS,s/O A. NOUSHAD, OMF
             COMPOUND, BANK ROAD, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD, PIN -
             678541
             BY ADVS.
             K.SUJAI SATHIAN
             DEEPA NARAYANAN(K/1754/1995)
             PREETHI. P.V.(K/1819/1999)
             M.V.BALAGOPAL(K/707/2009)
             GOURI MEEMPAT(K/001516/2021)
             SANGEETHA SREEKUMAR(K/2099/2022)
             T.SETHUMADHAVAN (SR.)(S-310)
             SRI.V.V.SIDHARTHAN(SR)


      THIS    OP   (CIVIL)   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
10.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                   4
OP(C) No.197 of 2023

                         C.S.DIAS, J.
                    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
                   OP(C) No.197 of 2023
                =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
          Dated this the 10th day of February, 2023.


                             JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by Ext P6 order passed in IA No.925/2022

in OS No.371/2011 by the Court of the Subordinate Judge

(Additional), Palakkad, the plaintiffs have filed the original

petition. The respondents are the defendants in the suit.

2. The relevant background facts leading to Ext P6

order are: the petitioners have filed the suit for partition.

The suit is resisted by the respondents Nos.12 and 15

through Exts P2 and P3 written statements. The suit

stands posted for pre-trial steps. The twelfth

respondent/thirteenth defendant filed IA No.975/2022

(Ext P4) to frame an additional issue. Although the

petitioners filed Ext P5 written objection to Ext P4

application, the court below, by the impugned Ext P6

order, has allowed Ext P4 application and formulated an

OP(C) No.197 of 2023

additional issue. Ext P6 is patently wrong and erroneous.

Hence, the original petition.

3. Heard; Sri.P.G Jayashankar, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioners, Sri.Sethumadhavan.T, the

learned Senior Counsel appearing for the twelfth

respondent and Sri. Sidharthan V.V, the learned Senior

Counsel appearing for the third respondent on admission.

4. The short question is, whether there is any

illegality in Ext P6 order.

5. Ext P1 plaint has been instituted, inter alia, for

a decree for partition. The suit is resisted by the

respondents Nos.12 and 15 through Exts P2 and P3

written statements.

6. In Ext P2 written statement, the twelfth

respondent has categorically averred in paragraph No.16

that, the corporate management, which is managing the

affairs of the property as well as the educational

institutions and recognized by the statutory authorities, is

not made a party in the suit. Hence, the suit is bad for

non-joinder of necessary parties.

OP(C) No.197 of 2023

7. The fifteenth respondent has also filed Ext P3

written statement almost on the same lines as in Ext P2

written statement.

8. When the suit was posted for pre-trial steps, the

twelfth respondent filed Ext P4 application, to raise an

additional issue, i.e., as to whether the suit is bad for non-

joinder of necessary parties.

9. The court below, by the impugned Ext P6 order,

after adverting to the contentions in Exts P4 application

and P5 counter statement, has allowed the application

and raised an additional issue, which reads as follows:

"Is the suit bad for non-joinder of necessary party?"

10. It is rudimentary, issues are formulated based on

the pleadings on record.

11. The respondents Nos.12 and 15, in Exts P2 and

P3 written statements, have specifically contended that

the suit is bad for non-joinder of the corporate

management, who is a necessary party.

OP(C) No.197 of 2023

12. In the light of the said contention in the written

statements, the court below, on the basis of the mandate

under Order XIV of the Code of Civil Procedure, has

framed the above additional issue. Now, whether there is

any merit in the said issues or not is a matter that is to be

decided on merits, and not at the present stage. I do not

find any error in court below framing an additional issue

based on the pleadings, warranting interference by this

Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The

original petition is meritless and is consequently

dismissed.

sd/-

sks/10.2.2023                           C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

OP(C) No.197 of 2023


                       APPENDIX OF OP(C) 197/2023

PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1          A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S. NO. 371

OF 2011 ON THE FILES OF THE ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGES COURT, PALAKKAD Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 12TH RESPONDENT HEREIN IN EXT P1 SUIT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE 15TH RESPONDENT HEREIN IN EXT P1 SUIT Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO. 975 OF 2022 PREFERRED BY THE 12TH RESPONDENT IN EXT P1 SUIT Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN TO EXT P4 Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2022 IN I.A. NO. 925 OF 2022 IN O.S. NO. 371 OF

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter