Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13409 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA,
1945
WP(C) NO. 40222 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1 SHARATH ELDO PHILIP
AGED 33 YEARS, PRESIDENT BUSHIDO
COMBAT CLUB, REG NO. KTM/TC 182/2022
MOOLAYIL, CHEERAMCHIRA PO
CHANGANACHERRY, PIN - 686196
2 ANUP S KURUP
AGED 33 YEARS, PRESIDENT BUSHIDO
KARATE CLUB, REG NO. KTM/TC 202/2022
KAITHARATHU, MALAKUNNAM PO
CHANGANACHERRY, PIN - 686532
3 P V ABRAHAM
AGED 74 YEARS, PRESIDENT ATTACHIRA
FITNESS ACADEMY, REG NO. KTM/TC 203/2022
MUNDACKAL PLAZA, OUT POST JUNCTION
KURICHY, CHANGANACHERRY, PIN - 686532
4 SAJIMON JOSEPH
AGED 52 YEARS, PRESIDENT, SARGA KALA
KSHETHRA, REG NO. KTM/TC 201/2022
MANANTHIKARY, TV PURAM PO VAIKOM,
KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686606
BY ADVS.
ANANTHAKRISHNAN A. KARTHA
ANIL D.KARTHA
SURESH G.
SREEKUMAR G.
ANANTHASANKAR A. KARTHA
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE KERALA STATE SPORTS COUNCIL
YMCA ROAD, STATUE JUNCTION PALAYAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
2 THE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT SPORTS COUNCIL
INDOOR STADIUM, KOTTAYAM,PIN - 686001
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
3 THE KERALA KARATE ASSOCIATION
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
W.P.(C).No. 40222 of 2023
:2:
KRISHNA BUILDING, ELANJIPARA
THRISSUR, PIN - 680721
4 THE REFEREE COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
THE KERALA KARATE ASSOCIATION
KRISHNA BUILDING, ELANJIPARA
THRISSUR,, PIN - 680721
5 THE SPORTS KARATE ASSOCIATION KOTTAYAM
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
OFF. VI/397 K, MANJOOR POST,
KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686603
BY ADVS.
P.JINISH PAUL
SNEHA V.(K/3319/2022)
LATHA ANAND
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 21.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No. 40222 of 2023
:3:
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are stated to be Presidents of certain Sports
Clubs, registered with the Kerala Sports Council. They say that even
though they had sponsored various players to the District Karate
Championship, they were not allowed to participate for the specious
reason that they did not pay a non existant entry fee. They assert that
the attempt of the respondents was to exclude worthy players, and to
choose candidates of their choice for the State Meet - which is
scheduled on 27.12.2023. They, therefore, seek a direction to the 1 st
and 2nd respondents Sports Councils to conduct a District Selection
again, including the players earlier sponsored by them; and thus
allow them to participate as per their eligibility in the State Meet.
2. Sri.P.Jinish Paul - learned counsel appearing for respondent
Nos.3 and 5, affirmed that the list sponsored by the petitioners were
not accepted by his clients, because they did not pay the entry fee.
He tried to point out that the requirement of paying an amount of
Rs.500/- per head, was a pre-condition for any candidate being
allowed to participate in the District Championship and asserted this
is clear from Ext.P2. He added that the petitioners were fully aware
of it because, they have conducted championship in the past and had
then charged such entry fee also. He, however, conceded to a pointed
question from this Court, that there is no document on record which
could establish that any such entry fee had been mandated; but
argued that this is unnecessary because, everyone knew this as a
"traditional payment".
3. I am afraid that this Court cannot find favour with the afore
submissions of Sri.P.Jinish Paul because, even going by Ext.P2, it only
says that if the players remit a specified amount before 20.11.2023,
they would be given lunch, tea and snacks. This does not mean that
an entry fee was stipulated; and, as I have already said above, none of
the other documents would even peripherally indicate this. It is thus
obvious that, 3rd and 5th respondents were insisting on a non-specified
entry fee, which had not been stipulated in any of the relevant or
germane documents.
4. Presumably being aware of the mind of this Court as afore,
Sri.P.Jinish Paul, offered that if this Court is not inclined to accept his
clients' explanation, then the 3 rd respondent is willing to conduct a
qualifying competition under the aegis of the 5 th respondent -
Association, involving the candidates sponsored by the petitioners
and who were not allowed to participate earlier. He submitted that
the 1st place holder in such competitions will then be allowed to
participate in the State Meet, which is scheduled on 27.12.2023.
5. Though, initially, Sri.Ananthakrishnan A.Kartha - learned
counsel for the petitioners, did not fully subscribe to the afore
suggestion, he thereafter conceded, being aware that there is no
other option available to his clients, or the players sponsored by
them, because the State Meet is just a few days away.
6. Smt.Latha Anand - learned Standing Counsel for the 1 st and
2nd respondents - Sports Council, also agreed to the afore suggestion
of Sri.P.Jinish Paul, and added that this is the best available to the
petitioners and their sponsored candidates.
7. When I evaluate and consider the afore rival submissions,
though this Court would have been inclined to grant relief to the
petitioners, had there been some more time before the State Meet, it
is now virtually impossible because it is scheduled as near as on
27.12.2023. I am also aware of the further submissions of Sri.P.Jinish
Paul that, all requirements and preparations for the State Meet have
been completed and that the players selected are in training; and
hence that if any further orders are to be issued by this Court,
including for the conduct of a fresh selection, it would clearly upset
the whole event.
In the afore circumstances, and since it is without opposition
even from the petitioners, I allow this writ petition with the following
directions:
(a) The 3rd respondent will immediately ensure that the
5th respondent conducts a competition from among the
players earlier sponsored by the petitioners; and
complete it within a period of two days from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment.
(b) For the afore purpose, the petitioners will, within a
period of 24 hours from now, make available their
respective lists to the 3rd or 5th respondent - as the case
may be, along with an entry fee of Rs.500/- per head; and
I record that this has been agreed to by the petitioners.
(c) On the afore competitions being held, the 1 st place
winner in each of the categories will be allowed to
participate in the State Meet scheduled on 27.12.2023.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/anm
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40222/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER PUBLICATION IN THE MATHRUBHOOMI DAILY PUBLISHED ON 08- 11-2023 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE GUIDELINES AND PLAYERS REGISTRATION FORM ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF THE STUDENTS FORWARDED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF THE STUDENTS FORWARDED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF THE STUDENTS FORWARDED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE LIST OF THE STUDENTS FORWARDED BY THE 4TH PETITIONER Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE SCREEN SHOT OF THE WHATSAPP MESSAGE SENT BY BINEESH TO THE PETITIONERS ON 24-11-2023 Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28-11-2023 Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT SHOWING THE LIST OF REGISTERED SPORTS CLUBS IN THE DISTRICT OF KOTTAYAM DATED 06-03-2023 RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R5(a) TRUE COPY OF THE AFFILIATION CERTIFICATE DATED 01.07.2023 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit R5(b) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT OF PAYMENT DATED 13.11.2022 FROM THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit R5(c) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEING THE TREASURER OF KOTTAYAM DISTRICT SPORTS KARATE -DO ASSOCIATION DATED 25-11-2017.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!