Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 13241 Ker
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 37530 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1 ELDHO JACOB T., AGED 49 YEARS, S/O JACOB,
THERAVAKKATTIL HOUSE, PATTIMATTOM PO,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683562
2 ISSAC MATHEW, S/O MATHAI, AGED 38 YEARS
THERAVAKKATTIL HOUSE, PATTIMATTOM PO,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683562
BY ADVS.
VINU CHAND
GEEVARGHESE MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:
1 KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD.,
KOTHAMANGALAM BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
BRANCH MANAGER, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM
DISTRICT, PIN - 686691
2 THE CHAIRMAN, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES LTD
HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR, "BHADRATHA", MUSEUM ROAD,
PB NO. 510, THRISSUR,, PIN - 680020
3 THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL
ENTERPRISES LTD, HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR, "BHADRATHA",
MUSEUM, ROAD, PB NO. 510, THRISSUR, PIN - 680020
4 THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR, KERALA STATE FINANCIAL
ENTERPRISES LTD, ERNAKULAM, KACHERIPPADY,
ERNAKULAM,, PIN - 682018
BY ADV
BINDU MOHAN
SRI.SALIL NARAYANAN - SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
15.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC 37530/22
2
JUDGMENT
Even though various assertions, averments and allegations are
made and urged in this Writ Petition, when this matter was called
today, Sri.Vinu Chand - learned counsel for the petitioners, confined
his plea that Ext.P3 representation preferred by his clients before the
respondent - Kerala State Financial Enterprises (KSFE), be directed to
be taken up and disposed of and that until it is done, further
recovery action pursuant to Ext.P2 be deferred.
2. In response, Sri.Salil Narayanan - learned Standing
Counsel for the respondents, submitted that if the petitioners only
require Ext.P3 representation to be taken up and disposed of in
terms of law, there does not appear to be any legal impediment in
doing so; but prayed that this Court may not make any affirmative
declarations on their entitlement to any relief and leave it to the
competent Authority to take a final decision as per law.
In the afore circumstances, I allow this Writ Petition and direct
the competent among respondents to take up Ext.P3 representation of
the petitioners and to dispose of the same, after affording them an
opportunity of being heard; thus culminating in an appropriate order
and necessary action thereon, as expeditiously as is possible.
Needless to say, until such time as the afore exercise is
completed and the resultant order communicated to the parties, all
further recovery action pursuant to Ext.P2 will stand deferred and
will be taken forward thereafter, depending upon the decision to be
arrived at.
Sd/-
RR DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37530/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY
THE 1ST RESPONDENT SHOWING THE REMITTANCE MADE BY THE PETITIONERS IN CHITTY NOS.22/2013-45 AND 22/2013-44 RESPECTIVELY Exhibit2 A TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE
DATED 15.3.2022, AGAINST THE PROPERTY OF THE 1ST PETITIONER AS WELL AS THE SURETY OF THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 2.10.2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!