Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9087 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 1ST BHADRA, 1945
CRL.A NO. 1537 OF 2006
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT SC 360/1999 OF DISTRICT COURT &
SESSIONS COURT,THALASSERY
SLP 334/2006 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANT/S:
GANGADHARAN NAMBIAR
S/O. SANKARAN NAMBIAR, DEVALAYAM, PAZHASSI
AMSOM,, KAYANI DESOM, P.O. KAYANI, KANNUR
DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
2 BABY PADMANABHAN
S/O. PADMANABHAN MASTER, THELAKANDAN VEETTIL,,
KAYANI DESOM, PAZHASSI AMSOM, P.O. KAYANI,,
KANNUR DISTRICT.
3 C.K. DHARMAJAN SO.GOVINDHAN NAMBIAR
CHATHOTHU HOUSE, KAYANI DESOM, PAZHASSI AMSOM,,
P.O. KAYANI, KANNUR DISTRICT.
4 K. RAJEEVAN SO. GOPALAN
KATTILEPURAYIL HOUSE, KAYANI DESOM, PAZHASSI
AMSOM, P.O. KAYANI, KANNUR DISTRICT.
5 M. SUDHAKARAN SO. GOVINDAN
KARIYIL MOOLAPARAMB, KAYANI DESOM,, P.O. KAYANI,
KANNUR DISTRICT.
6 V. MADHU MADHUSUDHANAN SO.KUMARAN
VELAKKA HOUSE, KAYANI DESOM, PAZHASSI AMSOM,,
P.O. KAYANI, KANNUR DISTRICT.
7 K.V. VIJAYAN SO. CHATHUKUTTY PANICKER
KUNHIPURAYIL HOUSE, KAYAI DESOM, PAZHASSI AMSOM,,
-2-
Crl.A. No. 1537 of 2006
P.O. KAYANI, KANNUR DISTRICT.
8 K.P. SATHYAN SO. CHATHUKUTTY PANICKER
KUNHIPURAYIL HOUSE, KAYAI DESOM, PAZHASSI AMSOM,,
P.O. KAYANI, KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
SRI.CIBI THOMAS
SRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL
SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT. MAYA M.N, PP
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
23.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
Crl.A. No. 1537 of 2006
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
======================================================
Crl.A. No. 1537 of 2006
=============================================================
Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2023
ORDER
This appeal is filed against the judgment, passed by the
Additional Sessions Judge, Thalasserry, dated 16.01.2006 in SC
No.360 of 1999 acquitting the accused.
Appellant is the complainant. When this appeal came up for
consideration, counsel appearing for the 2 nd respondent submitted that
there is no representation for the appellant and he has got information
that the appellant is no more. Therefore, this Court directed the Pubic
Prosecutor to verify whether the appellant is alive. Now the Public
Prosecutor, after the enquiry through the police, submitted that the
appellant is no more. No legal heirs came up with petition to pursue
this appeal. If that is the case, this Crl.Appeal need not be retained.
Accordingly, this Crl.Appeal is closed.
SD/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE das
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!