Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10733 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 29TH ASWINA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 28165 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
MOHAMMED SHAFEEK
AGED 42 YEARS
S\O. LATE ABOOBACKER
PARAKKAL VADAKKATH
KUREEPUZHA WEST, KAVANAD P.O, KOLLAM
, PIN - 691003
BY ADVS.
C.K.SHERIN
MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR
COLLECTORATE,
CIVIL STATION ROAD, KAANKATHU MUKKU,
KOLLAM
, PIN - 691013
2 DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER
CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM, PIN - 691013
OTHER PRESENT:
0
Spl. Gp. S. Renjith with AAG
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
19.10.2022, THE COURT ON 21/10/2022 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.28165/2022
2
V.G.ARUN, J.
-----------------------------------------------
W.P(C).No. 28165 of 2022
-----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of October, 2022
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the proprietor of MS Traders Kollam and is
engaged in wholesale and retail dealership of food grains. On
20/6/2022 large quantities of boiled rice, matta rice, raw rice and
wheat were seized from the petitioner's godown by an inspection
team headed by the second respondent. The seizure was
effected on an allegation that the food grains are being re-
bagged for sale in black market. According to the petitioner,
their seizure was effected without following the prescribed
procedure and without even preparing a mahazar. The petitioner
claims that all the food grain that was seized were purchased
from him from the open market and are covered by invoices. His
further contention is that the food grains seized from a mini lorry
parked outside its godown and containing the tags of FCI and
SUPPLICO does not belong to him and merely because the mini
lorry was parked in proximity to the petitioner's godown, there
cannot be any assumption that the food grains were brought for W.P.(C) No.28165/2022
the purpose of storing in the godown of the petitioner. Raising
this contentions and requesting for immediate release of the
seized articles, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 representation
before the second respondent. This writ petition is filed
aggrieved by the delay on the part of the second respondent in
considering Ext.P8 representation and releasing the food grains .
2. The second respondent has filed counter affidavit,
wherein it was stated that the inspection on 20/6/2022 was
conducted on the basis of secret information received that ration
goods were brought to a godown and was being re-bagged in
plastic bags. It is stated that when the inspection team reached
the spot, the employees who were engaged in re-bagging works
ran away from the spot. The inspection team had directly
witnessed the re-bagging of rationed articles. The petitioner
was not present in the premise and he never approached the
second respondent for obtaining a copy of the mahazar. As a
long term storage can damage the food grain, an emergent
action has to be taken under section 6(A) of the Essential
Commodities Act 1955 to dispose the food grains through the
Public Distribution System immediately. The genuineness of the
invoices are stated to be suspect, the invoices having been W.P.(C) No.28165/2022
produced twenty five days after seizure of the food grains. It is
also revealed that the petitioner is an accused in a crime
registered in the year 2017 alleging attempt to sell rationed
article in black market. The contention that the rationed articles
found inside the mini lorry does not belong to the petitioner is
refuted by pointing out that the inspection team had directly
witnessed transfer of the food grains from the mini lorry to the
petitioner's godown.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
the learned Government pleader, I am of the considered opinion
that the disputed facts involved cannot be resolved in a writ
petition under Article 226 . Moreover, as per section 6B of the
Essential Commodities Act, no order confiscating any article shall
be made under section 6A unless the owner of the essential
commodity or the person from whom it is seized was given a
notice in writing informing of the grounds on which is proposed
to confiscate the essential commodity. As the respondents
themselves have stated that the articles seized being perishable
it has to be distributed immediately, it will be in the interest of
both sides that the notice, as contemplated under section 6B,
shall be given to the petitioner at the earliest and the W.P.(C) No.28165/2022
proceedings under section 6A completed without delay.
4. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of directing the
respondents to complete the proceedings under Section 6A after
issuing notice to the petitioner and affording an opportunity as
provided under section 6B of the Essential Commodities Act. The
proceedings, as directed above, shall be completed within one
month of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN, JUDGE
dpk W.P.(C) No.28165/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE D&O LICENSE DATED 26.04.2022 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE DATED 19.07.2020 ISSUED BY FSSA Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE REG. NO.
32BJZPA0058H1ZB DATED 17.07.2018 ISSUED BY THE GST Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE E-WAY BILL DATED 22.04.2022 Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE E-WAY BILL DATED 23.05.2022 Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE DATED 17-06-22 Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE DATED 18.06.2022 Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14-07-2022 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 20.06.2022.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!