Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10482 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2022
WP(C) NO. 31586 OF 2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2022 / 15TH ASWINA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 31586 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
JOSHI C.N
AGED 62 YEARS
S/O NARAYANAN, CHERAKULAM HOUSE, THANNISSERY,
THRISSUR-680701.
BY ADV NAZRIN BANU
RESPONDENT/S:
1 THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
THRISSUR, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, THRISSUR-670003.
2 JOJI GEORGE,
MANJALY HOUSE, OLLUR P.O, THRISUR-680306.
3 THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, IRINJALAKUDA,
THRISSUR-680125.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP JIMMY GEORGE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.10.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 31586 OF 2022 2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
---------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No.31586 of 2022
--------------------------------------
Dated this the 7th day of October, 2022
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ order or direction commanding the 1 st respondent to act upon Ext.P4 complaint and issue a consequential consolidated time schedule to the 2nd respondent's stage carriage bearing registration number KL-08-AS-6145 incorporating the revision made vide Exhibit P3 proceedings.
(ii) Issue such other writ order or direction as this Honorable Court may deem fit and apposite in the facts and circumstances of the case." [SIC]
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 2 nd
respondent is conducting his stage carriage operation without
adhering to the approved time schedule and the 1st respondent
is refusing to take any remedial measures despite having found
that the complaints filed by the petitioner in this regard are
genuine and true in all material particulars. The petitioner
already submitted Ext.P4 before the 1st respondent. But there is
no action on Ext.P4. Hence, this writ petition.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a
direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P4 after giving an
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 2 nd respondent
within a time frame.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the
following directions :
1) There will be a direction to the 1 st respondent to consider
and pass appropriate orders in Ext.P4 as expeditiously as
possible, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment.
2) Before passing final orders, an opportunity of hearing
should be given to the petitioner and the 2nd respondent.
3) Since this writ petition is disposed of without hearing the
2nd respondent and if the 2nd respondent is aggrieved by
the same, the 2nd respondent is free to file a review petition
before this Court.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE SKS
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31586/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER VALID TILL 27.06.2023.
Exhibit P1(A) A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 06.08.2003.
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE ORIGINALLY ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT'S STAGE CARRIAGE SERVICE ON THE ROUTE CHIMMINI DAM- KODUNGALLUR.
Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 28.11.2001.
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 19.09.2022 ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 19.09.2022 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!