Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10437 Ker
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
Friday, the 7th day of October 2022 / 15th Aswina, 1944
WP(C) NO. 23550 OF 2022(P)
PETITIONER:
MOLLY JOSE, AGED 54 YEARS, W/O. JOSE JOSEPH, VETTIKKAPPILLIL HOUSE,
SURYANELLEY P.O., CHINNAKKANAL, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
RESPONDENTS:
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PAINAV, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 602.
2. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, DEVIKULAM,
IDUKKI - 685 613.
3. TAHSILDAR, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685 554.
4. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHINNAKKANAL VILLAGE, (VIA) UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI
DISTRICT - 685 554.
5. TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI DISTRICT - 685
554.
Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
pleased to direct the respondents to accept current year's land tax for
the property situated in Survey No. 246/1/1/2 having an extent of 11.50
cents of land, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
SRI. GEORGE ABRAHAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of GOVERNMENT PLEADER
for respondents, the court passed the following:
P.T.O
EXHIBIT R3(b):- TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR,
UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, DATED 26.03.2021.
EXHIBIT P9:- COPY OF THE LAND TAX PAID BY SHRI. BHASKARAN DATED
06.01.2021.
T.R.RAVI, J.
---------------------------------------------
W.P.(C)No.23550 of 2022
------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 7th day of October, 2022.
ORDER
The respondents have filed a counter affidavit to which the
petitioner has filed a reply affidavit. It is seen that the impugned
order has been issued on the basis of Ext.R3(b) which is a report
dated 26.03.2021 in which there is lack of clarity regarding the survey
numbers of the property of the petitioner. The judgment of this Court
is dated 16.11.2021 and it does not appear that there was any
physical verification after the judgment of this Court. Government
Pleader to get specific instructions on these aspects. If it is revealed
that there has been no physical verification after the judgment,
necessary action shall be taken to conduct a physical verification in
the presence of the petitioner. While conducting physical verification,
Officers shall also take into consideration the contention that the
property of the neighbouring owner which is covered by Ext.P9 tax
receipt, is shown to be in survey number 246/1-1-3.
Post the writ petition after one month.
H/o
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI JUDGE LEK
07-10-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!