Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11024 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 12TH
KARTHIKA, 1944
W.P.(C)NO.40690 OF 2018
PETITIONER:
M.J.SIVAKUMAR @ SIVAKUMAR AMRUTHAKALA,
S/O. SASHIDHARAN, MELETHIL HOUSE,
VALLAMKULAM, THIRUVALLA, PATHANAMTHITTA-
689541.
BY ADV S.SUBHASH CHAND
RESPONDENTS:
1 TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
OFFICE OF THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,
DEVASWOM BUILDING, NANDHANCODE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2 THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER,
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, OFFICE OF THE
DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, DEVASWOM BUILDINGS,
NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.
3 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
SABARIMALA DEVASWOM/SABARIMALA SREE
DHARMASATHA TEMPLE, SABARIMALA,
PATHANAMTHITTA-689645.
4 THE STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
695001.
5 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVASWOM, GOVERNMENT
2
W.P.(C)No.40690 of 2018
SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
6 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001.
7 THE STATE POLICE CHIEF,
OFFICE OF THE STATE POLICE CHIEF,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695001.
8 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTORATE,
PATHANAMTHITTA- 689645.
BY ADV SRI. S. RAJMOHAN, SC, TDB
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI S. RAJMOHAN - SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER;
SRI G. BIJU - STANDING COUNSEL - TRAVANCORE
DEVASWOM BOARD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 03.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
W.P.(C)No.40690 of 2018
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article
226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus
commanding the respondents to permit him to perform
Ayyappa Sopaana Sangeetham (Chandana Charchitham)
along with musical accompaniments (Pakka Melam) at the
Kalamandapam, in front of Veliya Nadapanthal at Sabarimala
shrine, during the Mandalam-Makaravilakku season of
2018-19; a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents
to lift the absolute ban/prohibition of all artistic
performances including Ayyappa Sopaana Sangeetham
performance by the petitioner at the Kalamandapam of
Sabarimala shrine, on such terms and conditions; and a
declaration that the absolute ban/prohibition of all artistic
performances including Ayyappa Sopaana Sangeetham by
the petitioner at the Kalamandapam of Sabarimala shrine by
the respondents is violative of the fundamental rights
guaranteed under Article 14, 19(1), 21 and 25 of the
Constitution of India and the same is thus liable to be struck
down.
2. On 20.12.2018, when this writ petition came up
W.P.(C)No.40690 of 2018
for consideration, this Court passed the following order;
"The learned Senior Government Pleader submits, on instructions, that the Special Officer at Sannidhanam is ready to consider the request made by the petitioner to enable him to perform his vow in 'Ayyappa Sopana Sangeetham' at the Kalamandapam at Sabarimala Sannidhanam, also taking note of the arrangements made with regard to the crowd management. It is also stated that the place in front of the stage- Kalamandapam has to be left as a sterile zone for security reasons and also as part of the crowd management, however adding that appropriate time to perform the event to the optimum extent will be let known to the petitioner, if the said officer is contacted.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to contact the said officer. It is for the Special Officer and authorities of the Travancore Devaswom Board to make appropriate arrangements in this regard."
3. Today, when this matter is taken up for
consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner and also
the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom
Board would submit that after the order of this Court dated
20.12.2018, the petitioner was permitted to perform
Ayyappa Sopaana Sangeetham at a place other than
Kalamandapam at Sabarimala Sannidhanam, for security
reasons. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit
W.P.(C)No.40690 of 2018
that the reliefs sought for in this writ petition have become
infructuous.
4. In such circumstances, based on the aforesaid
submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner,
this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE
Sd/-
P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE
MIN
W.P.(C)No.40690 of 2018
APPENDIX OF W.P.(C)No.40690/2018
PETITIONER EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING PROGRAM OF THE PETITIONER PERFORMED LAST YEAR AT KALAMANDAPAM AT SABARIMALA.
EXHIBIT P2 PHOTOGRAPH SHOWING PROGRAM OF THE PETITIONER PERFORMED LAST YEAR AT KALAMANDAPAM AT SABARIMALA
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 07/12/2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27/11/2018 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)NO.38128 OF 2018.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!