Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10950 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 31771 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
BIBIN
AGED 43 YEARS
PADAVETTIL HOUSE POOVANCHIRA POST THRISSUR, PIN -
680652
BY ADV SAIJO HASSAN
RESPONDENT/S:
THE THRISSUR URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD
REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER POST BOX NO 86 HEAD
OFFICE MISSION QUARTERS THRISSUR, PIN - 680001
BY ADV DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 31771 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging the
proceedings initiated against the petitioner by the respondent
bank under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act to recover
amounts due under two business loans availed by the
petitioner.
2. Petitioner had approached his Court at a time when
proceedings were initiated against the petitioner to take
physical possession of the secured assets under Section 14 of
the SARFAESI Act. By interim order dated 10.10.2022, this
Court directed that taking of physical possession of the
secured asset shall stand adjourned till 20.10.2022, on
condition that the petitioner remits a sum of Rs.1 lakh towards
the loan liability on or before 14.10.2022. Petitioner has
remitted the aforesaid sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh
only). Thereafter, when this matter came up for consideration
before this Court, it was submitted that the petitioner intends
to settle the entire liability by approaching another financial
institution for taking over the loan. On 20.10.2022, this court
passed the following order:-
''When this matter is taken up for consideration today, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank as on date the over due amounts in
respect of two terms loans availed by the petitioner after giving credit to the amounts paid under the interim order of this Court is Rs.25,52,053/-.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has approached another financial institution for taking over the entire liability. It is submitted that if the petitioner is given two weeks' time, the petitioner will be in a position to finalise take over of the loan by some other financial institution.
3. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent bank points out that the very same submission has been made before and there is absolutely no bona fides in the said submission.
4. Taking note of the submission made by the counsel as above, this writ petition is adjourned to be considered on 03.11.2022, making it clear that no further time will be granted to the petitioner for finalising any taking over of the loan by any other financial institution.
List on 03.11.2022''
3. When this matter is taken up for consideration
today, it is the case of the petitioner that the finalisation of the
take over of the loan by some other financial institution is yet
to be completed and the petitioner may be given further time
of one month to settle the entire liability either by paying the
entire amount demanded by the bank in lump-sum or by way of
One Time Settlement .
4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank
submits that the overdue amount itself, as on date, in respect
of the two loans availed by the petitioner is approximately
Rs.26 lakhs and there is no credible proposal by the petitioner
to settle the liability.
5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
asserts that if further period of two weeks is granted,
petitioner will be able to either settle the liability under One
Time Settlement or by way of finalisation of take over by
another financial institution.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case and considering the submission of the learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of,
directing that the order adjourning the taking of physical
possession of the secured asset will continue till 17.11.2022,
to enable the petitioner to settle the liability either under One
Time Settlement or by take over by another financial
institution. If the petitioner does not settle the liability as
aforesaid on or before 17.11.2022 , it will be open to the
respondent bank to continue with the proceedings initiated
against the petitioner under the provisions of the SARFAESI
Act. It is made clear that under no circumstances, any
extension of time will be granted to the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE ajt
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 31771/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 3.10.2022 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE-COMMISSIONER
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!