Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10934 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1944
BAIL APPL. NO. 8004 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT CRMC 1967/2022 OF ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT COURT & SESSIONS COURT - IV, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM / I
ADDITIONAL MACT
CRIME NO.795/2022 OF VATTIYOORKAVU POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANATHAPURAM DISTRICT
PETITIONERS/A1 TO A4:
1 SHIBU,
AGED 45 YEARS,
S/O. SUKUMARAN,
T.C.4/79, KURAVANKONAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
PIN - 695003
2 VISHNU,
AGED 23 YEARS,
S/O. SURESH KUMAR,
ARALUMOODU, NEYYATTINKARA,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
PIN - 695123
3 DEEPU RAJ,
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O. BABU,
MURINJAPALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
PIN - 695003
4 SUBIL,
AGED 22 YEARS,
S/O. SHAJI,
JIBU BHAVAN, BALARAMAPURAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
PIN - 695501
BY ADV SHAJIN S.HAMEED
B.A.No.8004 of 2022
2
RESPONDENT/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.,
PIN - 682031
BY
BY ADV.
PP - M.C.ASHI
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
B.A.No.8004 of 2022
3
K.BABU, J.
-------------------------------------------
B.A No. 8004 of 2022
---------------------------------------------
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2022
ORDER
This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners sought
permission to withdraw the petition as against petitioner No.1.
Therefore, the petition as against petitioner No.1 is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty to petitioner No.1 to approach the Sessions
Court, if he is so advised.
3. Petitioners No.2 to 4 are accused No.2 to 4 in Crime
No.795/2022 of Vattiyoorkavu Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram.
The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 294(b), 323,
324 & 308 of IPC.
4. The prosecution case is that on 11.09.2022 at 9.45
p.m., while the defacto complainant and his friend were standing
on the Public Road at Vattiyoorkavu, accused No.1 and the
petitioners came there and showered abusive words against the
defacto complainant. The defacto complainant questioned the act B.A.No.8004 of 2022
of the accused. The petitioners and the other accused voluntarily
caused hurt to the defacto complainant. They committed the
above acts in furtherance of their common intention with the
knowledge that if they by that act caused death of the defacto
complainant they would be guilty of culpable homicide not
amounting to murder.
5. The case of petitioners 2 to 4 is that they are innocent
of the allegations and they have not committed any acts as
alleged.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of
petitioners 2 to 4 on the ground that the custodial interrogation of
the petitioners is required and the weapon used is to be
recovered.
7. The report of the Investigating Officer shows that
accused No.1 alone used the weapon. The Case Diary reveals that
petitioners 2 to 4 have not used any weapon as alleged.
8. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
petitioners 2 to 4 happened to be in the scene of occurrence being
the friends of accused No.1. The learned counsel further
submitted that the petitioners are prepared to co-operate with the
investigation. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents . B.A.No.8004 of 2022
9. Having regard to the nature of the overt acts alleged
against petitioners 2 to 4 and the further fact that the petitioners
have not used any weapon, I am of the view that petitioners 2 to
4 could establish a prima facie case. Therefore, petitioners 2 to 4
are entitled to the extraordinary relief contemplated in Section
438 of the Cr.P.C.
In the result, this Bail Application is allowed as follows :-
(i) Petitioners 2 to 4 shall appear before the Investigating Officer on 10.11.2022, for interrogation.
(ii) The Station House Officer, Vattiyooorkavu Police Station is directed to release petitioners 2 to 4 on bail, in the event of their arrest, on their executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate with the Investigating agency.
(iv) The petitioners shall not influence the witnesses or tamper with the evidence.
K.BABU JUDGE VPK B.A.No.8004 of 2022
APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 8004/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure-A PHOTOCOPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.795/2022 OF VATTIYOORKAVU POLICE STATION.
Annexure-B FREE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26/09/2022 IN CRL.M.C.NO.1967/2022 OF THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT-IV, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!