Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10899 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 35161 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
O.K.NARAYANAN NAIR,
AGED 64 YEARS
S/O.THANKAMMA (LATE),
ORAPPURAKKATTU HOUSE, PUTHENPALLI.P.O.,
GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680103.
BY ADV AVANEESH KOYIKKARA
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
THRISSUR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION,
AYYANTHOLE POST, THRISSUR DISTRICT-680003.
3 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THRISSUR,
AYYANTHOLE.P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680003.
4 TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS),
TALUK OFFICE, CHAVAKKAD, VANJIKADAVU RD,
CHAVAKKAD, THRISSSUR-680506.
5 VILLAGE OFFICER,
VILLAGE OFFICE, IRINGAPRAM,
GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR 680 506.
SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 03.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.35161 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2022
The petitioner, who is owner of 10.53 Ares of land
comprised in Survey No.127/1 of Iringapram Village in
Thrissur District, is before this Court seeking to direct the
5th respondent-Tahsildar to take necessary steps consequent
to Ext.P1 order passed by the 3rd respondent-Revenue
Divisional Officer.
2. The petitioner states that his land is not a paddy
land. However, it was described as 'paddy land' in Revenue
records. The petitioner, therefore, submitted an application
invoking the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy
Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 to change the nature of his
land.
3. The 3rd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer,
after considering the reports of the Village Officer and
Agricultural Officer, decided to permit the petitioner to change WP(C) NO.35161 OF 2022
the nature of the land. According to the petitioner, by Ext.P1
order, the Revenue Divisional Officer has directed the
5th respondent-Tahsildar to take consequential action on
Ext.P1. In spite of the direction contained in Ext.P1, the
Tahsildar has not taken necessary steps, contends the
petitioner.
4. Government Pleader entered appearance and
resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader denied all
the allegations made by the petitioner in the writ petition.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Government Pleader representing the
respondents.
6. On the basis of application submitted by the
petitioner under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of
Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008, the 3rd respondent-
Revenue Divisional Officer has passed Ext.P1 order allowing
the application of the petitioner to change the nature of the
land. The petitioner has paid necessary conversion fee also WP(C) NO.35161 OF 2022
as required by the Revenue Divisional Officer. Ext.P1 directs
the Tahsildar to take consequential steps. In the
circumstances, it is only just and proper that the
5th respondent-Tahsildar take such steps within a reasonable
time.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of
directing the 5th respondent-Tahsildar to take consequential
steps pursuant to Ext.P1 order, within a period of one month.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH JUDGE spk WP(C) NO.35161 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 35161/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A COPY OF ORDER NO. B2-15484/2020 DATED 06.09.2022 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THREE SKETCHES OF THE PETITIONERS PROPERTY.
Exhibit P2 A COPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY
THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH
RESPONDENT DATED 04.10.2022.
RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS :NIL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!