Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr.Deepak vs The State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 3490 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3490 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2022

Kerala High Court
Mr.Deepak vs The State Of Kerala on 22 March, 2022
WP(C) No.8679/2022                       1/3

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                      PRESENT
                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
             Tuesday, the 22nd day of March 2022 / 1st Chaithra, 1944
                            WP(C) NO. 8679 OF 2022(H)
   PETITIONER:

          MR.DEEPAK, AGED 40 YEARS S/O.E.RAJENDRAN, EASWARA VILASAM,
          KIZHAKKEKARA, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM,PIN - 691506

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GENERAL EDUCATION
         DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
      2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EDUCATION, DGE OFFICE, JAGATHI, TRIVANDRUM.
      3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NEAR POLICE STATION, KOTTARAKKARA,
         , PIN - 691506
      4. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, 20, KOLLAM - ELAMBALLOOR RD,
         THEVALLY NAGAR, PALACE NAGAR, THEVALLY, KOLLAM, PIN - 691009
      5. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR (GENERAL), GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
         OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN -
         695014
      6. M.NIRMALA DEVI, D/O.A.EASWARA PILLAI, RESIDING AT EASWARA VILASAM,
         KIZHAKKEKKARA, KOTTARAKKA, KOLLAM, PIN - 691506
      7. ANITHA SIVAKUMAR, D/O.K.N.PILLAI, FLAT 7H, BLOCK A, PLANET X, SRI
         DHANYA HOMES, KALLAMPALLY, SRIKARIYAM MEDICAL COLLEGE
         P.O.,TRIVANDRUM, , PIN - 695011
      8. GEETHA M, D/O LATE CHANDRASHEJHARAN NAIR,A3 PANDITS COLONY,
         KOWDIAR,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695003


          Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be

   pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider Exhibits P16, P17 and P18

   while passing the final decision on Exhibit P13 Revision in compliance

   with Exhibit P14 judgment, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.



          This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and

   the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of

   M/S P.MARTIN JOSE, ANNA LINDA V.J, S.SREEKUMAR (SR.), HARIKRISHNAN S.,

   P.PRIJITH, THOMAS P.KURUVILLA, R.GITHESH, AJAY BEN JOSE, MANJUNATH MENON,

   SACHIN JACOB AMBAT, Advocates for the petitioner, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for

   R1 to R5(B/o), M/S BRIJESH MOHAN, RESMI G. NAIR, Advocates for R6 & R7 and

   of SRI. SYAM J SAM Advocate for R8, the court passed the following:
 WP(C) No.8679/2022                          2/3
                                         AMIT RAWAL, J.
                                   =================
                                     W.P.(C) No.8679 of 2022
                               =====================
                             Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2022


                                           ORDER

After hearing the argument to some extent, the entire

controversy revolves on a single point that whether in the revision

petition preferred by the petitioner vide Ext.P13, against the order

dated 14.4.2021, Ext.P12, which was said to be heard on

27.11.2021, during the pendency of the writ petition, any order

has been passed or not, and if yes, whether communicated to the

petitioner, as the grievance of the petitioner is that after the

revision petition was heard, a subsequent event had taken place,

whereby vide resolution dated 19.2.2022, Ext.P16 the majority of

the trustees had decided in favour of the petitioner to continue as

Manager and for the time being, that resolution is not under

challenge in any of the occasions.

2. Mr. Jimmy George submits that he has received the

instructions in the morning that the order has been passed after

the last posting date of the writ petition. At this stage, learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that noticing the predicament

of the petitioner there was an oral direction by this Court to the

learned Government Pleader to instruct the authorities not to pass

the order. Let the Government Pleader place on record material in

writing to this effect.

Post on 24.3.2022.

sd/-

                     sab                              AMIT RAWAL, JUDGE
22-03-2022 sa/131219sassssabs10.
                            /True Copy/                                Assistant Registrar
 WP(C) No.8679/2022                 3/3

                      APPENDIX OF WP(C) 8679/2022
Exhibit P12          TRUE COPY OF ORDER OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED

14-04-2021 REJECTING EXHIBIT.P10 REVISION PETITION Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF REVISION PETITION DATED 19-04-2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 27-08-2021 IN W.P.(C).NO.10804 OF 2021 AND W.P.(C).NO.16427 OF 2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED 19-02-2022 Exhibit P17 TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 25-02-2021 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN GEDN-F1/55/2021-GEDN Exhibit P18 TRUE COPY OF EMAIL SEND TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter