Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3463 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 9677 OF 2022
PETITIONER/S:
HOTEL PARASSINI POLARIZ
ANTHUR, PARASSINIKADAVU, KANNUR-670 563 (A UNIT OF L &
B HOTELS & RESORTS PVT,LTD, PARASSINIKADAVU P.O., NEAR
SNAKE PARK, KOLMOTTA, KANNUR-670 563), REPRESENTED BY
ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, LAKSHMANAN P.C. AGED 69 YEARS,
S/O. T.GOVINDAN NAIMBIAR, RESIDING AT SREE MUTHUNAM,
MANGAD, KALLIASSERI P.O., TALIPARAMBA, KANNUR-670 562
BY ADVS.
M.G.KARTHIKEYAN
NIREESH MATHEW
RESPONDENT/S:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, LABOUR DEPARTMENT,
GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001
2 THE CHIEF WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR,
THE KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, K.P.C.
BUILDING, ARYASALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 036
3 THE WELFARE FUND INSPECTOR (REGIONAL)
KERALA ABKARI WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, EAST
NADAKAVU, KOZHIKODE-673 011
4 THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER,
COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, EXCISE HEAD QUARTERS,
NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033
5 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE,
EXCISE DIVISION OFFICE, CIVIL STATION,F-BLOCK, KANNUR-
670 002
6 THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, (MINISTRY OF
LABOUR, GOVT. OF INDIA) P.B.NO.117,FORT BUILDING,
V.K.COMPLEX, FORT ROAD, KANNUR-670 001
SR.GP: SRI.BIMAL K NATH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
22.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 9677 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the holder of an FL-3 licence.
According to the petitioner, the establishment is
covered under the Employees Provident Fund and
Miscellaneous Provisions Act (EPF Act) and Scheme made
thereunder and therefore, they are not liable to pay
contributions under the Kerala Abkari Workers Welfare
Fund Act, 1989. Though the petitioner submitted Ext.P2
request before respondents 2 and 3 for issuance of
clearance certificate, they are insisting for payment
of Welfare Fund, is the grievance of the petitioner.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either sides.
If the establishment is covered under the
Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions
Act and the Payment of Gratuity Act, the petitioner is
not liable to pay Welfare Fund under the Kerala Abkari
Workers Welfare Fund Scheme, has been held by this
Court in Ext.P4 judgment. Therefore, it shall be open
for the petitioner to approach respondents 2 and 3
with documents evidencing the coverage under the EPF
Act along with the list of workers, and respondents 2
and 3 shall verify the same and ensure that all the
workers of the petitioner are covered under the EPF
Act. If they are covered, Clearance Certificate as
sought for under Ext.P2 shall be issued. If any of the
employees are not so covered, it will be open for
respondents 2 and 3 to demand contributions in respect
of those employees. Let the needful be done within a
period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment.
Sd/-
SATHISH NINAN JUDGE sd
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9677/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FL-3 LICENSE RENEWAL CERTIFICATE DATED 30.03.2021 Exhibit P2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 18.02.2022 SENT TO RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 WITH COPIES TO RESPONDENTS 4 TO 6 Exhibit P3 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE PAYMENT CONFIRMATION RECEIPT ISSUED FROM EMPLOYEE'S PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION Exhibit P4 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.03.2022 IN WPC NO.5983/2022 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!