Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3436 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 38269 OF 2015
PETITIONERS:
1 PUTHIYAPPA FISHERMEN & BOAT OWNERS WELFARE
ASSOCIATION
AGED 49 YEARS
REG. NO.KKD/CA/2000/2013 REPRESENTED BY ITS
SECRETARY PRASAD T.P., PUTHIYAPPA, PUTHIYANGADI
(PO), KOZHIKODE-673 021.
2 M.K.RAMACHANDRAN
MUKAVANKANDI, PUTHIYAPPA, PUTHIYANGADI PO,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
BY ADV SRI.V.JAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND PORTS, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
FISHERIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, FISHERY HARBOR
SUB DIVISION, PUTHIYANGADI (PO), PUTHIYAPPA,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
3 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
FISHERIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, FISHERY HARBOR
SUB DIVISION, PUTHIYANGADI PO, PUTHIYAPPA,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
4 RATHISH C.P.
CHERIYAPURAYIL, PUTHIYANGADI PO, PUTHIYAPPA,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
5 ARUNESH A.K.
A.K.HOUSE, AKKARAKKARAN, KOPPANTAKATHU,
PUTHIYANGADI (PO), PUTHIYAPPA, KOZHIKODE-673 021.
6 NIJESH V.P.
VAYALPEEDIKAYIL, PUTHIYAPPA NORTH ELATHOOR PO,
KOZHIKODE-673 303.
7 HARISH K.
KAYAKKALAKATHU, PUTHIYANGADI PO, PUTHIYAPPA,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
W.P.(C).No.38269/2015
2
8 VICHITHRAN
KUNJIYILINTAKATHU, PUTHIYANGADI PO, PUTHIYAPPA,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
9 RIGESH
KAYAKKALAKATHU, PUTHIYANGADI PO, PUTHIYAPPA,
KOZHIKODE-673 021.
BY ADVS.SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GP
SRI.ARJUN SREEDHAR
SRI.ARUN KRISHNA DHAN
SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI
SRI.T.K.SANDEEP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 22.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.38269/2015
3
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.38269 of 2015
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2022
JUDGMENT
Today, when the matter came up for consideration,
there was no representation for the petitioners. The
learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6 submitted that the
prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!