Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sreekandan B vs Vellarada Grama Panchayat
2022 Latest Caselaw 921 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 921 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022

Kerala High Court
Sreekandan B vs Vellarada Grama Panchayat on 25 January, 2022
W.P.(C)No.17844 OF 2021                 1




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
     TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 5TH MAGHA, 1943
                          WP(C) NO. 17844 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

            SREEKANDAN B
            AGED 63 YEARS
            AVANI, MAMPAZHAKKARA,
            PERUMPAZHATHOOR P.O,
            NEYYATTINKARA,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695126.
            BY ADVS.
            SRI ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL
            SRI S.SREEDEV
            SRI RONY JOSE
            SUZANNE KURIAN
            CIMIL CHERIAN KOTTALIL

RESPONDENTS:
     1    VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
          PANACHUMOODU P.O,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695505,
          REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
     2      SECRETARY
            VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
            PANACHUMOODU P.O,
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695505
            ADDL.R3 IMPLEADED
ADDL. R3: SURENDRAN @ MANOHARAN
          AGED 59 YEARS
          S/O.SANKARA PANICKER,
          ERAMATHUVEEDU,
          NELLISSERY,
          VELLARADA P.O.,
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695505.
          ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 01.10.2021
          IN IA 1/2021 IN WPC NO. 17844/2021.
 W.P.(C)No.17844 OF 2021                  2




            ADDL.R4 IMPLEADED
 ADDL.R4    THE GENERAL MANAGER,
            DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,
            KERALA, ADDL.R4 IS SUO MOTU IMLEADED AS PER ORDER
            DATED 09.11.2021 IN WPC .
            R1 & 2 BY SRI J.S.AJITHKUMAR
            R3 BY BY ADV SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
            M.BINDUDAS
            K.C.HARISH
            SRI RAJEEV JYOTHISH GEORGE, GOVT.PLEADER


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
ON   06.01.2022,      THE   COURT   ON       25.1.2022   DELIVERED   THE
FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(C)No.17844 OF 2021                3




                             T.R.RAVI,J.

-----------------------------

W.P.(C)No.17844 OF 2021

-------------------------------

Dated this the 25th day of January, 2022

The petitioner has set up a temporary hotmix plant after

obtaining Ext.P1 consent from the Pollution Control Board. He also

obtained Ext.P2 acknowledgement certificate under the provisions of

the Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019

(hereinafter referred to as the 2019 Act). As per Ext.P2 certificate,

the petitioner is exempted from obtaining any permission under any

of the State enactments for a period of three years. The petitioner

was issued Ext.P3 by the 2 nd respondent Panchayat directing him not

to operate the hotmix plant without obtaining licenses under

Sections 232 and 233 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994

(hereinafter referred to as the 1994 Act). According to the petitioner,

in view of Ext.P2 certificate, he is not obliged to obtain any licence

under any of the provisions of the the 1994 Act for a period of three

years. The writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P3 issued by

the Panchayat.

2. The 3rd respondent in the writ petition is a neighbour, who

has property adjacent to the site where the hotmix plant is put up by

the petitioner. The 3rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit

wherein it is stated that the area is a thickly populated area and the

hotmix plant is a mega construction with high profile equipments

operating on 130 HP and that it is an industry specified in the first

schedule to the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 as

contemplated in Section 7 of the Micro Small and Medium

Enterprises Development Act, 2006. According to the 3 rd

respondent, the hotmix plant is beyond the domain of 2019 Act

which had adopted by incorporation and reference the Micro Small

and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006. According to the

3rd respondent, the petitioner is obliged to obtain a permission for

development of the land and permit for setting up the hotmix plant

and to obtain the D&O licence as mandated by the Kerala Panchayat

Raj Act. It is further submitted that Ext.P2 acknowledgement

certificate has been wrongly issued, since it is not relating to an

industry to which the 2019 Act applies.

3. The petitioner has filed a reply affidavit in which it is

stated that the petitioner is operating a small enterprise as defined

in Section 7 of the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises

Development Act, 2006 and can be classified under Item 1(B) and

19(40) of Schedule 1 of the Industries Development and Regulation

Act, 1951. It is also submitted that the petitioner has already applied

to the 2nd respondent under Rule 68 of the Kerala Panchayat Building

Rules, 2019 seeking permission to install the hotmix plant and the

application is produced as Ext.P6. It is submitted that in view of the

judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in Tomy Thomas v. State

of Kerala reported in [2019 (3) KLT 987], the 2nd respondent

cannot refuse such permission, since the petitioner has already

secured consent from the Pollution Control Board.

4. The petitioner relies on the decision in Jolly George v.

George Elias and Associates reported in [2022 (1) KLT 8]

wherein a Division Bench of this Court held that on a conjoint

reading of Group I under Rule 25 of the Panchayat Building Rules,

2019 and the provisions of Rule 68 it is categoric and clear that any

construction of hotmix plant for a period of six months or below

requires only a permission from the Secretary of the Grama

Panchayat. It is further held that if the hotmix plant is to be

installed for a period beyond six months, it requires a compliance of

all the relevant provisions of the Building Rules, 2019 including a

building permit. The Court held that the legal position under the

Building Rules, 2019 has changed drastically from what was

available under the Building Rules, 2011 and the permanent nature

of a hotmix plant is to be identified now on the basis of the period

for which the plant is to be installed rather than the capacity or the

permanent fixtures to be employed for the setting up of the plant.

In the light of the Division Bench judgment, the counsel for the

petitioner submits that the contentions raised by the 3 rd respondent

are no longer relevant and all that is to be looked into is whether the

hotmix plant which is being set up by the petitioner is a temporary

one, in which case all that is required is a permission from the

Secretary and nothing more. In the light of the Division Bench

judgment as submitted by the counsel for the petitioner, the order

Ext.P3 which proceeds on the basis that setting up of the hotmix

plant requires the licence from the Panchayat, without which there

will be violation of the provisions of sections 232 and 233 of the

1994 Act, and further directs the petitioner to start the work only

after getting the licence required for installation of the machineries

for the tar mixing plant under the 1994 Act, cannot be legally

sustained. Since the law requires only a permission from the

Secretary and since the Pollution Control Board has already granted

consent to establish, there is no further requirement under the law

for any other licenses. The petitioner has no case that they are

seeking to establish a hotmix plant of permanent nature. Ext.P6

application submitted by the petitioner to the Secretary specifically

requests for permission to put up a temporary asphalt hotmixing

plant. By Ext.P7, the Panchayat Committee rejected Ext.P6

application on the ground that if the same is permitted to be put up,

there will be health issues to the public. The petitioner has produced

Ext.P8, which is an interim order issued by the Tribunal for Local Self

Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram in an appeal filed by

the petitioner challenging Ext.P7. In Ext.P8, the Tribunal has stayed

the decision of the Panchayat until further orders and had ordered

that the Panchayat shall not interfere with the erection and

installation of the hotmix plant by the petitioner. At the time

hearing, the petitioner has also placed before me the final order

issued in the above said appeal, whereby the Tribunal has set aside

Ext.P7 decision of the Panchayat and directed the Panchayat to issue

necessary permission under Section 68 of the Panchayat Building

Rules, 2019 for erection and installation of a temporary hotmix plant

in the property on the basis of the application dated 6.10.2020. In

the light of the subsequent events and the judgment of the Division

Bench in Jolly George (supra), the writ petition is liable to be

allowed.

5. In the result, the writ petition is allowed. Ext.P3 is set

aside. The 2nd respondent shall issue necessary permission as

contemplated in the judgment of the Division Bench in Jolly

George (supra) and as directed by the Tribunal in the judgment in

Appeal No.506/2021, on the basis of Ext.P6 application submitted by

the petitioner for a temporary hotmix plant immediately, if not

already issued, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this judgment. This judgment will not stand in the way of the 3 rd

respondent approaching the appropriate authorities, if there is any

attempt to convert the temporary hotmix plant into a permanent

hotmix plant, without the required licenses as held in the judgment

of the Division Bench above said.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE dsn

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17844/2021 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT DATED 26.07.2021 VALID TILL 30.06.2026 ISSUED BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CERTIFICATE DATED 17.08.2021 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT INDUSTRIES CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 31.08.2021 WITH NO.

A3/4338/2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 2021 ISSUED BY THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PWD ROADS, SOUTH CIRCLE TO THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P4(A) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26.02.2021 ISSUED BY THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PWD ROADS, SOUTH CIRCLE TO THE PETITIONER.

Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 8/10/2021 IN WPC NO.18358/2021 ON THE FILES OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 6/10/2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESONDENT.

Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 11.10.2021 BEARING NO.IX(1) TAKEN BY THE PANCHAYAT COMMITTEE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2021 IN I.A 1092/2021 IN 506/2021 ON THE FILES OF THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS.

RESPONDENTS' EXTS:

EXT.R3(A): TRUE COPY OF THE MASS COMPLAINT DATED NIL BEFORE THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. EXT.R3(B): TRUE COY OF COMUNICATION DT.8.6.2021 FROM DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TO THE SECRETARY OF VELLARADA GRAMA PANCHAYAT.

EXT.R3(C): TRUE COPY OF MASS COMPLAINT DT.27.8.2021 BEFORE THE PRESIDENT OF GRAMA PANCHAYAT.

EXT.R3(D): PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE CHANGE OF TERRAIN OF LAND AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CARRIED ON.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter