Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1058 Ker
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022/7TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 2611 OF 2022
PETITIONERS:
1 INDOTHAI AIRPORT MANAGEMENT SERVICES
PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY VIKAS LADIA,
DIRECTOR, 29/709, 714 STAR BUILDING,
MAVOOR ROAD, PARAYANCHERI, CALICUT-673 004.
2 INDOTHAI CALICUT PRIVATE LIMITED,
REPRESENTED BY VIKAS LADIA, DIRECTOR,
29/709, 714 STAR BUILDING, MAVOOR ROAD,
PARAYANCHERI, CALICUT-673 004.
BY ADVS.
HARIS BEERAN
O.A.NURIYA
FATHIMA V.A.
ANAND B. MENON
FASNA T.Y
AZHAR ASSEES
RESPONDENTS:
1 AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN,
CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,
CALICUT AIRPORT, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
CALICUT-673 647.
2 AIRPORT DIRECTOR,
AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
CALICUT INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,
CALICUT AIRPORT, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT,
CALICUT-673 647.
SRI APPU P.S., G.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C)No.2611/2022
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 27th day of January, 2022
The petitioners are Private Limited Companies
incorporated under the Companies Act. The 1st petitioner had
participated in the tender for ground handling services,
floated by the 1st respondent during the year 2020. The
petitioners are before this Court seeking to direct the 1 st
respondent-Airport Authority of India to grant extension of
COD to the petitioners till such time restrictions upon air
travel are lifted completely.
2. The petitioners contend that due to the onset of
Covid-19 Virus (the pandemic), the Aviation/Airline Industry
has suffered unprecedented losses as the flights were halted
for almost a year and operations continue to be affected due
to Circulars issued by the Director General of Civil Aviation.
The functioning of airports has been below 20% of its regular WP(C)No.2611/2022
operations. Even today, according to the petitioners, the
situation remains bleak and there is rise in numbers as well
as variants of the virus. Amidst such unprecedented losses
being suffered by the petitioners on a daily basis, the
respondents are refusing to grant extension of COD, which
is arbitrary and unfair. The petitioners therefore seek to set
aside Ext.P23 show-cause notice dated 20.12.2021 which
imposes to take action for the alleged non-achievement of
COD as per the prescribed timeline.
3. When this writ petition came up for hearing today,
the learned Senior Counsel assisted by the Counsel
representing the 1st respondent submitted that the
respondents have already issued Ext.P23 show-cause
notice for non-compliance of COD in terms of the
Concession Agreement. Ext.P23 notice was issued on
20.12.2021. The petitioners have not submitted any reply to
the said show-cause notice. If the petitioners submit a reply, WP(C)No.2611/2022
the respondents are ready to consider the grievances of the
petitioners.
4. The counsel for the petitioners, on the other hand,
pointed out that the respondents have already, even before
hearing the petitioners, concluded that Force Majeure caluse
cannot be applied in the circumstances of the case. Ext.P23
also would show that the respondents have already taken a
decision in this regard. In such circumstances, giving
explanation to Ext.P23 is not likely to yield any positive
result.
5. To such submission, the learned Senior Counsel
for the respondents submitted that if the petitioners give their
explanation to Ext.P23, the respondents are ready and
willing to consider the explanation untramelled by any
observation or decision reflected in Exts.P12 and P23.
6. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that
ends of justice will be met if the petitioners are permitted to WP(C)No.2611/2022
file their reply to Ext.P23 show-cause notice and the
respondents consider the explanation with an open mind.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of
permitting the petitioners to submit explanation to Ext.P23
show-cause notice within a period of three weeks. If the
petitioners submit explanation within a period of three
weeks, the respondents shall consider the explanation and
take appropriate decision thereon untramelled by any of the
observations made in Exts.P12 and P23, in accordance with
law, within a further period of two weeks.
Sd/-
N. NAGARESH JUDGE ncd/27.01.2022 WP(C)No.2611/2022
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 2611/2022
PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP).
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF LETTER OF INTENT DATE 19/02/2021.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 23/02/2021
SENT BY 1ST PETITIONER TO 2ND
RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 16/03/2021
SENT BY 1ST PETITIONER TO 2ND
RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P4(a) TRUE COPY OF COMPANY MASTER DATA OF 2ND
PETITIONER.
Exhibit P4(b) TRUE COPY OF COMPANY PROFILE OF 2ND
PETITIONER.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF BANK GUARANTEE FURNISHED
DATED 05/04/2021 SENT BY 1ST PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 03/06/2021. Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21/06/2021. Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF CONCESSION AGREEMENT DATED 19/07/2021.
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 28/07/2021. Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 10/09/2021. Exhibit P11 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 15/09/2021.
Exhibit P12 TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 18/10/2021
ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE
PETITIONER.
Exhibit P13 TRUE COPY OF CHART WHICH RECORDS THE
INTERNATIONAL AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS. Exhibit P14 TRUE COPY OF RECOMMENDATION LETTER ISSUED BY AIRPORT DIRECTOR TO BCAS DATED 20/04/2021.
Exhibit P15 TRUE COPY OF SECURITY CLEARANCE ISSUED BY BCAS TO 1ST PETITIONER.
Exhibit P16 TRUE COPY OF SECURITY PROGRAM OF 2ND WP(C)No.2611/2022
PETITIONER SCRUTINISED BY CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER TO BCAS, TRIVANDRUM DATED 20/09/2021.
Exhibit P17 TRUE COPY OF LETTER SENT BY 2ND PETITIONER TO 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING STATUS REPORT DATED 17/06/2021.
Exhibit P18 TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING LAND ALLOTMENT DATED 30/07/2021.
Exhibit P18(a) TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING LAND ALLOTMENT DATED 17/09/2021.
Exhibit P18(b) TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGARDING LAND ALLOTMENT DATED 09/11/2021.
Exhibit P19 TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO 2ND PETITIONER REQUESTING USAGE OF EXISTING EQUIPMENT DATED 25/10/2021.
Exhibit P20 TRUE COPY OF LEGAL NOTICE DATED 05/11/2021 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P21 TRUE COPY OF LETTER ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO 2ND PETITION TO OPEN ESCROW ACCOUNT DATED 23/11/2021.
Exhibit P22 TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 02/12/2021
ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE
PETITIONER.
Exhibit P23 TRUE COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
20/12/2021.
Exhibit P24 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 19/03/2020.
Exhibit P25 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 26/03/2020
ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF CIVIL
AVIATION.
Exhibit P26 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 24/03/2020
ISSUED BY UNION OF INDIA.
Exhibit P27 TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR DATED 09/12/2021
ISSUED BY THE DGCA.
Exhibit P28 TRUE COPY OF CIRCULAR DATED 19/01/2022
ISSUED BY THE DGCA.
WP(C)No.2611/2022
Exhibit P29 TRUE COPY OF RELEVANT PAGES FROM
WIKIPEDIA SHOWING THE TIMELINE OF COVID WAVE IN INDIA.
Exhibit P30 TRUE COPY OF MINISTRY OF FINANCE ORDER DATED 13/05/2020.
Exhibit P31 TRUE COPY OF OFFICE MEMORANDUM DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2020 WITH RESPECT TO MANUAL FOR PROCUREMENT OF GOODS, 2017.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!