Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1009 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 5TH MAGHA, 1943
OP(C) NO. 153 OF 2022
AGAINST ORDER DATED 23.01.2021 IN O.P.(T.P.)NO.40/2020 ON THE
FILE OF DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA
PETITIONER/4TH PETITIONER:
C S MATHAI
AGED 68 YEARS
SO THOMAS SAMUEL,
CHANJAPLACKAMANNIL VEEDU,
ELANTHOOR EAST MURI, ELANTHOOR VILLAGE
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689643
BY ADVS.
V.PHILIP MATHEWS
GIBI.C.GEORGE
E.RADHAKRISHNAN
AMAL PARTHASARADHY
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT AND PETITIONER 1 TO 3 AND 5:
1 K A ABRAHAM
AGED 68 YEARS
KOLEDATHU PARAMBIL MILI VILLA,
ELANTHOOR EAST MURI, ELANTHOOR VILLAGE
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689692
2 ALEYAMMA CHERIYAN
AGED 78 YEARS
PANGATTETHEKKETHIL VEEDU,
THURUTHIMEL MURI, CHERIANADU VILLAGE
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689511
3 RAHELAMMA
AGED 71 YEARS
PODIPPARA VEEDU, AYROOR SOUTH MURI,
AYROOR VILLAGE
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689611
OP(C) NO. 153 OF 2022
2
4 JOLLY JOHN
AGED 68 YEARS
THATTAMANNIL VEEDU, VENNIKKULAM MURI,
PURAMATTOM VILLAGE
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689544
5 MARIAMMA JOY
AGED 63 YEARS
MELATHU VEEDU, KIZHAKKUPURAM,
KONNY THAZHAM MURI, KONNY THAZHAM VILLAGE
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689692
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.01.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP(C) NO. 153 OF 2022
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of January, 2022
The petitioner, who is the 6th plaintiff in O.S.No.278/2002
pending before the Munsiff Court, Ranny, has filed this Original
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by
order dated 23.01.2021 in O.P.(TP) No.40/2020 on the file of the
District Court, Pathanamthitta, whereby his prayer to transfer the
said case to Munsiff Court, Pathanamthitta has been dismissed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on
admission.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that the subject matter of the suit is originally within the
jurisdiction of Munsiff Court, Pathanamthitta. However for
convenience, at an earlier point of time, the above suit was
transferred to Munsiff Court, Ranny. According to the learned
counsel for the petitioner, now the petitioner is not in a position to
travel 25 Kms from his residential place to contest the matter and,
therefore, the suit required to be transferred to Munsiff Court,
Pathanamthitta for the convenience of the petitioner. OP(C) NO. 153 OF 2022
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner pressed for
transfer of a case of the year 2002 now pending before the Munsiff
Court, Ranny. I have perused the order of the learned District
Judge. The learned District Judge observed that two cases, viz.,
O.S.No.278/2002 and O.S.No.280/2002 were jointly tried and
disposed off. Thereafter, on appeal both these cases were
remanded back in appeal. Therefore, there was no justification for
the transfer to have further delay in disposal of the oldest cases.
On appraisal of the facts as aforesaid, I am not inclined to
interfere with the order impugned and I am of the view that the
transfer sought for, cannot be allowed for the reasons above stated
and observed by the learned District Judge.
In view of the matter this Original Petition deserves no merits
and is dismissed.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr OP(C) NO. 153 OF 2022
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 153/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 COPY OF OP(TRANSFER) NO.40/2020 FILED BEFORE DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA
Exhibit P2 COPY OF ORDER DATED 23-01-2021 IN O.P(TP) NO.40/2020 ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!