Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2127 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 5TH PHALGUNA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 99 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5459/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN WP(C) 5459/2021:
1 ARUN P.
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O PONNAN D, CHAITHANNYA, NAMBARUVIKALA, ALUMKADAVU P O,
KARUNAGAPPALLY P O, KOLLAM-690573.
2 PRAJEESH KUMAR T.
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O THULASEEDHARAN PILLAI, THULASIBHAVANAM, VENDAR P O,
KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM-691507.
3 DARVIN T K.
AGED 50 YEARS
S/O KUTTAPPAN, THEEKALATHIL HOUSE, PALISSERYL, ANNAMANADA P
O, THRISSUR-680741.
4 ANOOP T V.
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O THANKAPPAN PILLAI, KUDAVATOOR P O, ODANAVATTOM,
KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM-691512.
5 JIJESH U.
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O UNNIKRISHAN, THOTINGAL HOUSE, CHEMBALODE, CHANDIYA
NAGAR P O, PALAKKAD-678007.
6 SHIJU H.
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O HAMSA, AYAAN, TBGRI ROAD, KARIMANCODE P O, PACHA
PALODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695562.
7 SABARINATH C.
AGED 42 YEARS
S/O ACHUTHAN, CHEMBARA HOUSE, BRAHMAKULAM P O, GURUVAYOOR,
THRISSUR-680104.
8 KISHORE BABU P V.
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O VISWANATHAN VADAKKEY, CHERUPALACODE, KARUVILAPUTHVEEDU,
2
CoC.No. 99 of 2022
KOTTACKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695124.
BY ADVS.
K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN
S.R.PRASANTH
BHANU THILAK
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 3 & 4 IN WP(C)5459/2021:
1 SYAMSUNDAR IPS
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE BEVERAGES (M &
M), CORPORATION LTD, SASTHAKRIPA OFFICE COMPLEX,
SASTHAMANGALAM. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010.
2 T K VISWANATHAN
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS.
GENERAL MANAGER (ADMINISTRATION), KERALA STATE
BEVERAGES (M & M), CORPORATION LTD, SASTHAKRIPA
OFFICE COMPLEX, SASTHAMANGALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-
695010.
SRI.T.NAVEEN. SC.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 24.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
3
CoC.No. 99 of 2022
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 24th day of February, 2022.
When this matter was called today, Sri.T.Naveen -
learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, conceded
that Annexure A2 order issued by his clients do not take
into account all the limbs of the directions of this Court.
He submitted that, therefore, Annexure A2 will be
withdrawn and a fresh comprehensive order issued in
terms of judgment within two weeks.
Recording the afore submissions, I close this
contempt case, leaving liberty to the petitioners to
approach this Court after three weeks from the date of
receipt of a copy of this judgment, in the event a fresh
CoC.No. 99 of 2022
order, as undertaken above, is not issued by the
respondents.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE
Raj/24.02.2022.
CoC.No. 99 of 2022
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 99/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 ONLINE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.08.2021 IN WPC NO.5459/2021. Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.11.2021 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT. Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 18.12.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!