Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajamma vs Babu Mathew
2022 Latest Caselaw 2106 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2106 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2022

Kerala High Court
Rajamma vs Babu Mathew on 24 February, 2022
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERl\IAI{ULAM

                                        PRESENT
                        THE HOINOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

      THURSDAY, THE 24" DAY OF FEBRUARY 2©22 / 5" PHALGUNA, 1943
                                  MIACA NO.   19© OF 2®19

  AGAINST THE AWARD EIATED 2€.09.2®ae 1« er±RAr ±9±/2o+ae OF TI+I              HoleR
                      ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL , THODUPUZHA

APPEL LANT/CLAIMIANT :

                 RAJAMMA
                 AGED 54 YEARS
                 W/0.SUKUMARAN, VADAKKEDATH HOUSE, THALAPPULAM. P.0. ,
                 PLASSANAL, NOW RESIDING AT VADAKEDATH HOUSE,
                 THUDANGANADU KARA, MUTTOM VILLAGE.


                 BY ADVS.
                 MATHEWS K.PHILIP
                 SMT . T . MANASY




RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :

      1          BABU MATHEW,
                 ARIYAPPILLIL HOUSE, KURIANAD.P.0.,
                 MARANGATTUPAL LY -686636 .


                 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
                 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISI0NAL MANAGER,            DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
                 MUVATTUPUZHA .


                 BY ADV SMT.P.A.REZIYA




      THIS   MOTOR ACCIDENT        CLAIMS APPEAL   HAVING   COME    UP   FOR ADMISSION

0N 24.02.2022,   THE C.OURT 0N THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 RACA NO. 190 0F 2019




                        TUDGMENT

      The appeal is filed by the petitioner in O.P.(M.V)

No.191/2018 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims

Tribunal,      Thodrlpuzha,   seeking    eHhaHcement        of

compensation.

    2. On the s-uggestion ma[de by this` Court, the

appellant and the second respondent agreed to explore
the possibility Gf settling thofr dispute through direct
negotiation.

    3, PursHant to the. settle-memt talks he-ld in this Court,
the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement as per
the terms and conditions in the Joint Statement dated
11.02.2022, which is signed by the parties and counter

signed by the respective counsel.

    4. I have perused the Joint Statement dated
11.02.2022 and found that the compensation amount

agreed between the parties to be just and reasonable, and
 MACA NO.   19© OF 2®19


that the settlement is in accordance with laLw.
     5. In the result, the appeal is allowed as per the

terms and conditions in the joint Statement dated
11.02.2022, which shall form a part of the judgment.

     6. This Court places on record its appreciation for

both the appellant as well as the second respondent -
iH§uFer iH harmoniously settling the dispute and puttiiig

an end to the litigation, and also for saving precious

judicial time.
     All pending interlocutory applications will stand
closed.


                                           Sd/-
                                        C.S.DIAS
                                         JUDGE
ram/24/02/2022
                                                                                                             bfukgr,-


             Presented On :              c9i )a \ dec$3
                       RE TEE HONOURABLE I-IIGH COURT OF KERALA
                                AT EENAKtJLAM

                                                                          -\
                                  MACANo.         190          /2019        #

              Rajamma                                                •           Appellant

                                                                     Vs.

              Babu Mathew & another                                          Respondents

               IQEJTS,TATEMENT2FH:EPESB#APPELLANTANDTRE
A




                                                                   I+i beg evT ± ite#j#

                                                                                  i.
                                                                                  gfui I ke i fro y2_




                     :`zf-I-------`---`-`t-    ~[.-jJ` MAIHEWS 'K. PHILIP

                                                   ADVOCATE K/129/1986
                                                  38/360, Manorama Junction
                                                  Karithala Road` Cochin - 1 F
                                                    Ph .. 2321122, 2316188

                                               Counsel for the appellant




                                               Counsel for the respondent
                                                Ace. ng cx , P . f-a
                                                              -3_
            i+ \\=                              K-`3,I
                                                                         6.his
                                               `r=hadyvnth¢{;vnlp~
=\c-\`a{-                                                      givififeA/
                                                K H c fr ffi




                                                                                                        r
                    I

BEFORE TIH HONOURABLE HGH COURT OF KERALA
              AT ERNAKELAn4

            MACA `No.       190      / 2019

Rajamma                                           Appellant



Babu Mathew & another                             Respondents

 ]OENTSTALTEMEN"2ELEESBp%;NDEEENTAPPELANTANDTFFE-


1. The above appeal is filed against the award dated 28.9.2018 in
  O.P.(MV) No.191/2018 of         MACT Thodupucha.           The original   a

  petition is filed by the appellant claiming compensation in respect of
  the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident which
  occurred on 17.11.2016 involving the Car bearing registration No.
  KL-35-E-3256 insured with the 2nd respondent.         The Tribunal had

  granted a sum of Rs.5,11,640/-as compensation with interest @ 9%
  p.a. from the date of petitiori.   It is challenging the quantum of
  compensation that the above appeal is filed. Since the 2nd respondent
  had admitted the coverage of the insurance policy in respect of the
  offending vehicle, the liability to pay the compensation is on the 2nd
                                                                            ®
  respondent.     The services of notice on the lst respondent was
  dispensed with at the risk of the appellant by the High Court.
  Nevertheless, the presence of lst respondent is not needed before this
  Honourable court since the accident and the policy are admitted.
  Hence the settlement is arrived at between the appellant and the 2nd
  respondent.




  Appellant : Rajamma                2nd Respondent

                                                   **

India Insura]

IAMAan a Company Ltd.

ItIut DrtyNhRgr I

2. The appellant above named and the 2nd respondent have negotiated the matter out of court and willingly arrived at a compromise settlement in full and final settlement of all the claims of the appellant against the 2nd respondent arising out of the accident and the original

petition mentioned above. It is agreed that the 2nd respondent shall pay an additional amount of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) inclusive of all interest and costs to the appellant by way of full and final settlement of all the claims of the appellant against the 2nd respondent.

a 3. The 2nd respondent hereby agrees to transfer by way of NEFT the above amount of Rs.2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Fifty Thousand only) within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the copy of the judgment from the Honourable High Court, to the following bank account of the appellant, the details of which Adhar No.6590 7977 2065, Account No.57018866398, IFSC Code :SBTR0000480, State Bank of Travancore, Plassanal, P.B. No.1., and the appellant shall provide a true copy of his bank pass book from page and Adhar Card to the 2nd respondent within 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment from the Honourable High Court for enabling ® the 2nd respondent to effect the payment of the a*d i#al amount, failing which the said amount will cany 9°/o interdsflrfuthe date of rfu ng.

`tt]!£€iiz;M vifef¥¥# default.

•\xp/ Appellant : Rajamma 2nd Respondent : ted India Insuran :REnpi any Ltd.

rd* IAxrsREE a a,gde DftyNa,qu i

4. There is no threat, coercion or undue influence in arriving at the above settlement. There is no mistake in arriving at the settlement either.

It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court to record this joint statement and to pass a judgment in terms thereof.

Dated this the llth day of February, 2022.

EE Advocate Rajamma Counsel for the appellant

Ws United India dv. P.A. Raziya Insurance Co ny Limited Counsel for the 2nd respondent

wh* u |AVASREE G giv de DeputyManger

¥fe' t#.;ba-¥~-

               t#        £+Li##rfe`d¥{E€€

                    ¥¥*rfeut# fr#3~
              i +afutr    i   ftyi. u¥t. 5+r.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter