Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1940 Ker
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 4356 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
SOORAJ.C.H
AGED 37 YEARS
S/O. MADHAVAN NAMBIAR,
THEYERATH HOUSE, IRINAV P. O.,
KANNUR - 670 301, (NO.915264 G SERGEANT OF INDIAN AIR
FORCE), PRESENTLY POSTED AT 13 TAC AIR FORCE,
C/O 14 CORPS,
PIN - 908 514,
C/O 56 APO.
BY ADVS.
SRI. RATHEESH. B
ARI. GYOTHISH CHANDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
NEW DELHI - 110 011.
2 THE CHIEF OF THE AIR STAFF,
AIR HEADQUARTERS (VAYU BHAVAN),
NEW DELHI - 110 011.
3 AIR OFFICER COMMANDING,
AIR FORCE RECORD OFFICE,
NEW DELHI - 110 010.
4 TAC COMMANDER,
13 TAC AIR FORCE, 14 CORPS,
C/O 56 APO, PIN - 908 514.
5 COMMANDING OFFICER,
820 SU, AIR FORCE,
ALLAHABAD, C/O 56 APO.
SRI. S. MANU - ASGI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.4356 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is a serving soldier of Indian Air Force.
Since the petitioner has completed the hard area tenure
at Leh, he sought for transfer by submitting an
application as per Ext.P1 posting policy showing the
choice of posting in the order of preferences as
Trivandrum, Coimbatore, Bangalore and Chennai. The
petitioner was informed that his request for transfer to
the place of his choice is not traceable and was asked to
re-submit the choice posting proforma. Accordingly, the
petitioner by Ext.P2 re-submitted the choice posting
proforma on 27.10.2021. However, without considering
the same, the petitioner was posted to Allahabad with
date of reporting as 31.01.2022. The petitioner,
therefore, submitted Ext.P3 application which was
strongly recommended by the 4th respondent as evident
from the endorsement thereon. Since no steps pursuant WP(C).No.4356 OF 2022
thereto are forthcoming, the petitioner submitted Ext.P5
request and has approached this Court for a direction to
the 3rd respondent to transfer the petitioner to any of the
chosen places in his choice posting proforma and in
accordance with Ext.P1 policy, within a reasonable time.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned ASGI for the respondents.
3. The learned ASGI on instructions submits that,
at present it may not be possible for the respondents to
accommodate the petitioner at the place of choice given
by the petitioner in the application already submitted.
However, the request of the petitioner for transfer to the
place of his choice will be re-considered by the competent
respondent at the earliest, if the petitioner re-submits the
choice posting proforma including other places of choice
as well.
Having regard to the submissions made by counsel
on both sides, the writ petition is disposed of directing
the petitioner to submit fresh choice posting proforma WP(C).No.4356 OF 2022
showing choice of places in the order of preference,
within a period of one week and the competent among
the respondents will consider and take a decision on the
same, within a period of two weeks thereafter.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SPR WP(C).No.4356 OF 2022
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF AIR HQ HUMAN RESOURCE POLICE PART II/PA (AIR WARRIORS)/PD/01/2020 (REVISED) ISSUED VIDE AIR HQ/S 40301/PA II DATED 07.07.2020.
EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF CHOICE POSTING PROFORMA RESUBMITTED ON 27.10.2021.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF GENERAL APPLICATION DATED 14.12.2021.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF LETTER
NO.13TAC/128/11/HRM (P3) DATED
15.12.2021.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF REQUEST DATED 01.02.2022.
RESPONDENTS'S EXHIBITS: NIL.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!