Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bunashkhan @ Achu vs State Of Kerala
2022 Latest Caselaw 1463 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1463 Ker
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2022

Kerala High Court
Bunashkhan @ Achu vs State Of Kerala on 2 February, 2022
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                   PRESENT
                 THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
     WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 13TH MAGHA, 1943
                          CRL.MC NO. 153 OF 2022
 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CRMP 2581/2021 OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS
                               COURT, ALAPPUZHA
     CRIME NO.90/2021 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA.
PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

            BUNASHKHAN @ ACHU,
            AGED 28 YEARS
            S/O. THAJUDEEN, BISMINA MANZIL, MANJADITHARA MURI,
            BHARANIKKAVU VILLAGE, (FROM KOTTAYIL VEEDU, ERUVA MURI).

            BY ADVS.
            K.SASIKUMAR
            S.ARAVIND
            P.S.RAGHUKUMAR



RESPONDENT/STATE:

            STATE OF KERALA,
            REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
            KERALA, KOCHI 31.


OTHER PRESENT:

            PP SRI SANAL P RAJ




     THIS   CRIMINAL   MISC.    CASE   HAVING   COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
02.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 CRL.MC NO. 153 OF 2022
                                 2

                          O R D E R

This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Cr.P.C.') seeking to

set aside an order passed by the Court of Sessions, Alappuzha on

23.12.2021, copy of which is produced alongwith as Annexure

A4. The order assailed was passed in Crl.M.P. No. 2581/2021 in

Crime No.90/2021 of Vallikunnam Police Station, Alappuzha.

The application was filed by the investigating officer seeking for

extension of period for completion of investigation and period of

detention of accused No.1 in the crime for a period of one year

under Section 36 A (4) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act'). The 1 st

accused is the counter petitioner in the application.

2. The application was allowed by the Court and time

was extended beyond the period of 180 days. The court below

failed to state in the impugned order the time extended for CRL.MC NO. 153 OF 2022

conclusion of investigation and custody. As per the provision the

court can extend the time upto one year beyond 180 days on

being convinced from the report of the Public Prosecutor

indicating the progress of the investigation and the specific

reasons for the detention of the accused beyond 180 days.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor has contended that

though the application was filed by the investigating officer, it

was signed by the Public Prosecutor and therefore compliance of

the direction in the provision is met with.

4. It is pertinent to note that such a context is not

contemplated by the provision. As per the provision, the Public

Prosecutor has to file a report indicating the progress of the

investigation and stating the specific reasons warranting the

detention of the accused beyond 180 days.

5. In the case on hand an application was filed by the

investigating officer. The progress of the investigation is not CRL.MC NO. 153 OF 2022

stated. What is contemplated under Sub-Section (4) of Section

36A is a report. Instead of that, an application is filed, that too by

the investigating officer who was not authorised by the

provision. The court also failed to state in the order the time

granted in extension. As per the provision court can extent the

period upto one year, beyond 180 days. Therefore, the direction

in the provision is violated. The impugned order being passed in

an application filed by an incompetent person is illegal and is

only to be set aside.

In the result, Crl.M.C is allowed and the impugned order is

set aside reserving liberty to the Prosecutor concerned to file a

report as mandated by the provision.

Sd/-

MARY JOSEPH JUDGE

al/-

CRL.MC NO. 153 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 153/2022

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

Annexure A1 A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CONSULTANT ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL, COCHIN DATED 8.3.2021.

Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER BEFORE THE HON'BLE SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA DATED 2.12.2021.

Annexure A3 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN CRL.M.C. NO. 2141/2013.

Annexure A4 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SESSIONS COURT, ALAPPUZHA IN CRL.M.P NO. 2581/2021 DATED 23.12.2021.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter