Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12530 Ker
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 2ND POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 26298 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
MICHAEL T. MATHEW
AGED 70 YEARS
SON OF MATHEW,
RESIDING AT THEKKUMKATTIL HOUSE,
CHUNDACHERI P. O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 579.
BY ADVS.
ABRAHAM GEORGE JACOB
C.MURALIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
KERALA IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MINING AND GEOLOGIST,
SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE P.O.,
CIVIL STATION, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 002.
3 THE GEOLOGIST,
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT
MINING AND GEOLOGY, CIVIL STATION,
COLLECTORATE P. O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 002.
4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER,
BHARANANGANAM VILLAGE,
MEENACHIL TALUK, PALAI,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 002.
5 LISSIAMMA MICHAEL
RESIDING AT THEKKUMKATTIL HOUSE,
CHUNDACHERI P. O.,
KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 579.
SRI. B.S SYAMANTHAK - GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 23.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.26298 OF 2022
2
JUDGMENT
Alleging indiscriminate quarrying in the property
comprised in Resurvey No.56/1 in Block No.36 of
Bharananganam Village belonging to the 5 th
respondent, the wife of the petitioner, Exts.P2 and P4
notices were issued to the petitioner by the 3 rd
respondent for initiating action for illegal quarrying.
According to the petitioner, he has no interest in the
property of his wife and that the proceedings as
against him pursuant to Exts.P2 and P4 cannot be
proceeded with. The petitioner, therefore, filed
Exts.P3 and P5 objections to Exts.P2 and P4. Since
proceedings pursuant to Exts.P2 and P4 are not
dropped, this writ petition is preferred.
2. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the
3rd respondent and paragraph 5 of the counter
affidavit reads as follows:-
WP(C).No.26298 OF 2022
"5. It is respectfully submitted that a complaint regarding indiscriminate quarrying has been received in the office of this respondent in the aforesaid land. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau vide letter dated 07.03.2022 called for the report details on the action taken on the complaint regarding illicit quarrying in the aforesaid land violating the Rules. As per the Rule 3(3) of the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, '2015 "No person shall transport to be transported any mineral or mineral products by any carrier without having a valid mineral transit pass under these Rules". By virtue of Rule 108 (2) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 "Whenever any person raises without any lawful authority any mineral irom any land, the Government or the competent authority may recover from such person or the occupier of the land the mineral so raised, or where such mineral has already been disposed of, the price thereof, and may also recover from such person rent, royalty or tax, as the case may be, for the mineral extracted by such person or occupier the land without any lawful authority". In order to take action as per the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 show cause notice No.1927/DOY/ML/2021 dated 07.03.2022 was sent the Land owner Smt.Lisamma Michale and the petitioner. On 16.03.2022 Smt.Lisamma Michael has submitted a reply that quarrying has been done for construction of building. Since the entire area has been quarried transporting the said granite without valid permission or transit passes violating the Kerala Minor Miner Concession Rules 2015/the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015 demand notice No.1931/DOY/ML/2021 dated 10.06.2022 was WP(C).No.26298 OF 2022
sent to Smt.Lisamma Michale and the petitioner. It is submitted that as per the revenue records the land in Block 36, Resurvey No.56 Comprising of 15.36 ares of land is in the ownership of Smt.Lisamma, W/o Michale T Mathew. The notice was sent to both Smt.Lisamma Michale and the petitioner. The issuance of notice to the petitioner was due to an inadvertent mistake. This respondent will rectify the same in the follow up action regarding the offence."
(emphasis supplied)
Since it has been stated in the counter affidavit
that the proceedings initiated against the petitioner
was by an inadvertent mistake and steps are being
taken to withdraw the proceedings as against the
petitioner, I am of the view that, nothing survives to
be considered in the writ petition.
Recording the affidavit of the 3 rd respondent as
extracted above, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SPR WP(C).No.26298 OF 2022
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
DATED 22/04/2021 ISSUED BY THE
BHARANANGANAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 10/06/2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT GEOLOGIST.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE DATED 14/03/2022 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 07/03/2022 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT GEOLOGIST TO THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY GIVEN BY THE
PETITIONER TO EXHIBIT P4 DATED
27/06/2022.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!