Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12117 Ker
Judgement Date : 22 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 1ST POUSHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 25852 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
FASIYA
AGED 23 YEARS
W/O. SAIDALAVI,
RESIDING AT MANAMKANDATH HOUSE,
MANNARAPARAMBU, KAPPUR,
PALAKKAD - 679 552.
BY ADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
PREETHI RAMAKRISHNAN
T.C.KRISHNA
C.ANIL KUMAR
ASHA K.SHENOY
PRATAP ABRAHAM VARGHESE
RESPONDENTS:
1 MAHABOOB BHASHA
S/O. MOHAMMED, KAKKARTHUNDIYIL,
MANNARAPARAMBU, KAPPUR,
PALAKKAD - 679 552.
2 SECRETARY
KAPPUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
KAPPUR, PALAKKAD - 679 552.
3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYATHS,
COLLECTORATE, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
SRI. VINOD JABAR - SC
SANTHEEP ANKARATH
M.GIRIJA VALLABHAN
SRI.B.S SYAMANTHAK - GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 22.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.25852 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner and her husband who are joint
owners of property comprised in old Survey No.378 of
Kappur Village in Pattambi Taluk are constructing a
building in the said property. The 1 st respondent has
preferred a complaint before the Panchayat alleging
removal of earth by the petitioner for the purpose of the
construction of the residential building.
2. Pursuant to the complaint filed by the 1 st
respondent, the Panchayat has issued a stop memo and
the petitioner has preferred Ext.P5 appeal against the
same before the Tribunal for Local Self Government
Institutions and the Tribunal has stayed the stop memo.
3. According to the petitioner, the 1st respondent
has carried out certain unauthorised construction and she
has preferred Exts.P3 and P9 complaints before the 2 nd
respondent. She has approached this Court for a
direction to the 2nd respondent to act upon Exts.P3 and
P9.
WP(C).No.25852 OF 2021
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,
the learned counsel for the 2 nd respondent and the
learned Government Pleader for the 3 rd respondent.
Though notice was served on the 1st respondent, there is
no appearance.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case and
having regard to the submission made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, there will be a direction to the
2nd respondent to consider Exts.P3 and P9 after hearing
the petitioner or her authorised representative and the 1 st
respondent, within a period of one month from the date
of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of with the above
direction.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE
SPR WP(C).No.25852 OF 2021
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER REPORT SUBMITTED IN OS NO.255/2017.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 03.01.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 18.11.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 09.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 05.02.2020 IN I.A NO.146/2020 IN APPEAL NO.93/2020 PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS.
EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 20.04.2020 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 04.05.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 21.01.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:- NIL.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!