Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11814 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 41580 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
MUPPATHADAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. E-216
AGED 50 YEARS
MUPPATHADAM P.O, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY., PIN - 683110
BY ADVS.
M.PAUL VARGHESE
M.M.MONAYE
K.V.SANOSH
RESPONDENTS:
1 ASSESSMENT OFFICER/INCOME TAX OFFICER, ASSESSMENT UNIT,
NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2ND FLOOR,
E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI, PIN - 110003
2 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL
FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC),
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
JAWAHARLAL STADIUM, DELHI, PIN - 110003
3 THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD - 2, TPS, KAP COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, O/O ADDITIONAL
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALUVA RANGE, R.S. ROAD,
ALUVA , PIN - 683101
4 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONAR OF INCOME TAX, KERALA
C.R. BUILDING, I.S. PRESS ROAD, KOCHI , PIN - 682018
OTHER PRESENT:
ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P (C) No.41580/2022 -2-
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is a Primary Agricultural Credit Society registered under the Kerala Co-
operative Societies Act, 1969. Ext.P1 order of assessment was issued against the petitioner.
In the assessment order, petitioner's claim for deduction under Section 80P was rejected
on the ground that there was no evidence to show that petitioner satisfied the ingredients
of the Primary Agricultural Credit Society as contemplated under the Kerala Co-operative
Societies Act.
2. While assailing the assessment order before the 2 nd respondent, petitioner
has sought to canvass that the judgment of the Supreme Court in Mavilayi Service Co-
operative Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax; 2021 (1) KLT 485 now
governs the field thereby rendering the assessment itself as incorrect.
3. Since the petitioner has already preferred an appeal as Ext.P2 along with
Ext.P4 application to condone the delay in filing the appeal and the same is pending
consideration before the 2nd respondent, I deem it fit that this writ petition be disposed of
directing the 2nd respondent to consider the appeal in a time bound manner.
4. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2 nd respondent to consider and
pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible within a period of 2
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. .
5. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be initiated against the
petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1.
It is made clear that the appellate authority needs to consider the appeal on merits
only if he decides to condone the delay in filing the appeal.
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE AMG
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 41580/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit-P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 23.08.2022 FOR THE AY 2020-21 ALONG WITH DEMAND NOTICE
Exhibit-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL IN FORM 35 DATED 11.102022
Exhibit-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIPT OF INCOME TAX FORMS DATED 11.10.2022
Exhibit-P4 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION TO CONDONE THE DELAY DATED 11.10.2022
Exhibit-P5 TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FOR STAY DATED 11.10.2022
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!