Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Thilakan vs State Bank Of India Sbi
2022 Latest Caselaw 11788 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11788 Ker
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022

Kerala High Court
Thilakan vs State Bank Of India Sbi on 21 December, 2022
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                               PRESENT
                THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
 WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 30TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
                       WP(C) NO. 40309 OF 2022
PETITIONER:

          THILAKAN,
          AGED 49 YEARS,
          S/O.APPU, OTHALAKKATT NIKARTH HOUSE,
          AROOKUTTY P.O., CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA-688 535.

          BY ADV K.V.SABU



RESPONDENTS:

    1     STATE BANK OF INDIA,
          RASMEC, IRON BRIDGE P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 012.

    2     AUTHORIZED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, RASMEC,
          IRON BRIDGE P.O., ALAPPUZHA - 688 012.

          BY SMT.DEEPA NARAYANAN


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WP(C) NO. 40309 OF 2022

                                     2




                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner availed two loans from the respondent

Bank. One is a housing loan and the other is a top up loan.

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging

proceedings under the SARFAESI Act which have been

initiated by the bank for recovery of the amounts due from

the petitioner.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioner has confined

the relief to an opportunity for repaying the overdue amount

in instalments and to obtain regularisation of the loan

accounts.

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent bank

that the petitioner committed default in repayment of the

above two loans and the total overdue amount as on

15.12.2022 is Rs.7,54,087/-(Rupees seven lakhs fifty four

thousand and eighty seven only). It was further submitted

that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as

a matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to

accept repayment of the overdue amount in limited

instalments and regularise the loan accounts. WP(C) NO. 40309 OF 2022

4. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as

well as the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and

the situation now prevailing, apart from the submissions

made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner

can be granted an opportunity to repay the overdue amount

in 15 instalments and thereafter, if the amount so directed is

repaid within the time as directed above, to have the loan

account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

respondent bank to accept repayment of the entire overdue

amount of Rs.7,54,087/-(Rupees seven lakhs fifty four

thousand and eighty seven only) along with any accrued

interest, costs and charges from the petitioner and regularise

the loan accounts of the petitioner on the following

conditions:

i. The overdue amount of Rs.7,54,087/-(Rupees seven lakhs fifty four thousand and eighty seven only) along with any accrued interest, costs and charges shall be repaid in 15 equated monthly instalments.

ii. The first instalment shall be paid on or before 15.01.2023 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the 15th day of every succeeding month.

WP(C) NO. 40309 OF 2022

iii. Petitioner shall continue to pay the regular EMI's along with the instalments directed above.

iv. In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with law.

v. In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

Notwithstanding the above directions, it will always be open

to the petitioner to approach the respondent Bank for

restructuring of the loan. However, the filing of such

representation will not absolve the petitioner of the liability to

pay instalments in terms of this judgment. If One Time

Settlement / restructuring facility is granted, the parties will

be governed by the terms of such agreement and not by the

terms contained in this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

GOPINATH P.

JUDGE DK WP(C) NO. 40309 OF 2022

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 40309/2022

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 A COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.31.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Exhibit P2 A COPY OF THE NOTICE SEND BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DT.7.9.2019

Exhibit P3 A COPY OF THE NOTICE DT.6.10.2022 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter