Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11634 Ker
Judgement Date : 20 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 29TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 2402 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
THE MANAGER,
VAIDYARATNAM AYURVEDA COLLEGE
OLLUR, TRICHUR
BY ADVS.
SRI.KURIAN GEORGE KANNANTHANAM (SR.)
SRI.M.B.PRAJITH
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,
NEW DELHI 110001
2 THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT FO AYURVEDA YOGA, NATUROPATHY,
UNAMI, SIDDHA & HOMEOPATHY (AYUSH),
IRCS BUILDING, NEW DELHI 110058
3 THE CENTRAL COUNSIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 61-65,
INSTITUTIONAL AREA, JANAKAPURI, N. DELHI 110058
BY ADVS.SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG OF INDIA
SRI.S.MANU, DSGI
SRI.K.T.THOMAS
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 20.12.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.2402/2012
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
--------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.2402 of 2013
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 20th day of December, 2022
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i. To issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate order or direction to direct the respondents to proceed with petitioner's application for approval of the P.G. Course on its merits and pass orders thereon, ignoring the dispute over the U.G. Courses.
ii. To declare that the pendency of the dispute which is the subject matter in W.P(c)No. 20418/2012, will not be a ban for considering petitioner's application for establishing P.G. programms, or its merits.
iii. To grant such other reliefs as are just and proper in the nature of this case.
(SIC)
2. This writ petition is pending before this Court from
2013 onwards. The main prayer in this writ petition is to issue
appropriate direction to the respondents to proceed with the
application of the petitioners for approval of the PG course on WP(C).No.2402/2012
its merits. No interim order is passed in this case. This writ
petition need not be retained indefinitely. The DSGI who
represent the respondents submitted that the prayers in this
writ petition are infructuous.
Therefore this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JV JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!