Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11491 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
RSA NO. 938 OF 2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11-07-1997 IN OS
13/1993 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, ADOOR.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28-02-2006 IN AS
101/1997 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA.
APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT - 1ST DEFENDANT :
* DAMODARAN KARANAVAR (DIED),
S/O.KOCHUKUNJU KURUP, VALLITHEKKETHIL HOUSE,
THOTTAKONAM MURI, PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
*ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 2 TO 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS THE
LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED SOLE APPELLANT VIDE
ORDER DATED 27-08-2009 IN I.A NO.1278 OF 2009 :
ADDL.A2 CHELLAMMA, AGED 71 YEARS,
W/O LATE DAMODARA KARANAVAR,
VALLILTHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
ADDL.A3 SOMAVALLY, AGED 48 YEARS,
D/O LATE DAMODARA KARANAVAR,
VALLILTHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
ADDL.A4 KERALAN, AGED 40 YEARS,
S/O LATE DAMODARA KARANAVAR,
VALLILTHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.GEORGE VARGHESE KANNANTHANAM
SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM
R.S.A Nos. 938 & 984 of 2006
-: 2 :-
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT- RESPONDENTS 2 & 3/PLAINTIFF-
DEFENDANTS 2 & 3 :
1 SIVARAMA KARANAVAR,
S/O KOCHUKUNJU KURUP,
NELLIPPALLIL VEEDU, THOTTUKKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
2 BHAVANI AMMA, D/O.GOWRI AMMA
VALLITHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
3 CHANDRIKA DEVI, D/O.LEELAMONYAMMA
CHERUVALLIL VEEDU, THOTTAKKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE.
R1 AND R3 BY ADVS.
SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR
SRI.K.S.SIVA KUMAR
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR
HEARING ON 09.12.2022, ALONG WITH RSA.984/2006, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.S.A Nos. 938 & 984 of 2006
-: 3 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA,
1944
RSA NO. 984 OF 2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11-07-1997 IN OS
112/1992 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, ADOOR.
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28-02-2006 IN AS
102/1997 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA.
APPELLANT/ 1ST RESPONDENT - 1ST DEFENDANT :
* DAMODARA KARANAVAR (DIED),
S/O. KOCHUKUNJU KURUP,
VALLILTHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
ADDL.A2 CHELLAMMA, AGED 71 YEARS,
W/O. LATE DAMODARA KARANAVAR,
VALLITHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
ADDL.A3 SOMAVALLY, AGED 48 YEARS,
D/O. LATE DAMODARA KARANAVAR,
VALLITHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
ADDL.A4 KERALAN,AGED 40 YEARS,
S/O. LATE DAMODARA KARANAVAR,
VALLITHEKKETHIL HOUSE, THOTTAKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
* ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 2 TO 4 ARE IMPLEADED
AS THE LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SOLE APPELLANT
AS PER THE ORDER DTD. 23/06/2009 IN I.A.
1196/2009
R.S.A Nos. 938 & 984 of 2006
-: 4 :-
BY ADVS.
SRI.K.GEORGE VARGHESE KANNANTHANAM
SRI.TONY GEORGE KANNANTHANAM
RESPONDENTS : APPELLANTS 1&2 AND RESPONDENTS 2 TO
5/PLAINTIFFS - DEFENDANTS 2 TO 5 :
1 SIVARAMA KARANAVAR, S/O. KOCHUKUNJU KURUP,
NELLIPPALLIL VEEDU, THOTTUKKONAM MURI,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
2 LEELAMONY AMMA, D/O. KARTHIYAYANI AMMA, -DO-.
3 ANANDA VALLY, D/O. LEELAMONY
VALIL THEKKETHIL HOUSE, THONALLOOR MURI,,
PANDALAM VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK.
*4 VIJAYAKUMAR, (DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY)
S/O. SIVARAMA KARANAVAR -DO-.
THE NAME OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT IS DELETED FROM
THE PARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE APPELLANT
AS PER ORDER DATED 26/3/09.
5 GEETHAKUMAR, D/O. LEELAMONY AMMA, -DO-.
6 USHA KUMARI, D/O. LEELAMONY AMMA, -DO-.
* THE NAME OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT IS DELETED
FROM THEPARTY ARRAY AT THE RISK OF THE
APPELLANT AS PER ORDER DATED 26-03-2009 IN I.A
NO.598 OF 2009.
BY ADVS.SRI.C.B.SREEKUMAR & SRI.K.S.SIVA KUMAR.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR
HEARING ON 09.12.2022, ALONG WITH RSA.938/2006, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
R.S.A Nos. 938 & 984 of 2006
==========================
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2022
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
to his information the disputes have been settled
between the parties. In the light thereof, it is
requested that the appeals may be dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
Sathish Ninan, Judge
amk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!