Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ondhath Aysha vs Nittamkandy Divakaran
2022 Latest Caselaw 3785 Ker

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3785 Ker
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2022

Kerala High Court
Ondhath Aysha vs Nittamkandy Divakaran on 5 April, 2022
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                          PRESENT
        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
                             &
         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
  TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1944
                  O.P.(RC) NO. 85 OF 2022
EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL OF I.A.NO.1 OF 2022 IN R.C.A.NO.102 OF
  2018 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY
         (ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-IV), THALASSERY
PETITIONERS:

    1    ONDHATH AYSHA
         AGED 50 YEARS, W/O. ABDULLA,
         RESIDING AT CT HOUSE, P.O. PANOOR,
         THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670692.
    2    PUTHENVEETTIL FATHIMA
         AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. MOIDHU MASTER,
         PUTHENVEETTIL, P.O. PANOOR, THALASSERY TALUK,
         KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670692.
    3    VALIYAPARAMBATH SUHARA
         AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. MUSTHAFA,
         ACHARAMBATH HOUSE, P.O. PUTHOOR,
         THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670692.
    4    VALIYAPARAMBATH SUBAITHA
         AGED 44 YEARS, W/O. YOUSAF,
         KAVIL HOUSE, PUTHOOR P.O., THALASSERY TALUK,
         KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670692.
         BY ADVS.
         K.P.SUDHEER
         J.RAMKUMAR
                              2
O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022



RESPONDENT:

           NITTAMKANDY DIVAKARAN
           AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. BALAN,
           NITTAMKANDY HOUSE, P.O. PATTIAM,
           PATTIAM VILLAGE, THALASSERY TALUK,
           KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670691.



      THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 05.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
                                 3
O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022



                          JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioners-landlords filed R.C.P.No.73 of 2014

before the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Thalassery, a petition

under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings

(Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, seeking eviction of the

respondent herein-tenant from the petition schedule shop

room. In R.C.P.No.73 of 2014, the Rent Control Court passed

Ext.P1 order of eviction dated 30.07.2018, under Section

11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act, and the tenant was directed to

surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule shop

room to the landlords, within the time limit specified in the

order. Challenging the order of eviction granted in R.C.P.No.73

of 2014, the tenant filed R.C.A.No.102 of 2018 before the

Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge-

IV), Thalassery, invoking the provisions under Section 18(1)

(b) of the Act. During the pendency of that Rent Control

Appeal, the landlords filed I.A.No.1 of 2022, an application

under Section 12 of the Act, seeking an order directing the

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

tenant to deposit arrears of rent within a specified time and in

case of failure, direct the tenant to handover vacant

possession of the petition schedule shop room to the

landlords. The grievance of the petitioner is the delay in

disposal of R.C.A.No.102 of 2018 and also I.A.No.1 of 2022,

the application filed under Section 12 of the Act.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners-

landlords. Considering the nature of the relief proposed to be

granted, service of notice on the respondent-tenant is

dispensed with.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would point

out that the Rent Control Petition is one of the year 2014, in

which an order of eviction was passed on 30.07.2018. The

appeal filed by the tenant as R.C.A.No.102 of 2018 is pending

before the Rent Control Appellate Authority, for the last more

than three years. In that appeal, the landlords filed I.A.No.1

of 2022, an application under Section 12 of the Act, seeking

an order directing the tenant to deposit admitted arrears of

rent, which is also pending consideration.

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

4. Section 12 of the Act deals with payment or deposit

of rent during the pendency of proceedings for eviction. As

per Section 12(1), no tenant against whom an application for

eviction has been made by a landlord under Section 11, shall

be entitled to contest the application before the Rent Control

Court under that Section, or to prefer an appeal under Section

18 against any order made by the Rent Control Court on the

application, unless he has paid or pays to the landlord, or

deposits with the Rent Control Court or the Appellate

Authority, as the case may be, all arrears of rent admitted by

the tenant to be due in respect of the building up to the date

of payment or deposit, and continues to pay or to deposit any

rent which may subsequently become due in respect of the

building, until the termination of the proceedings before the

Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case may

be. As per Section 12(2), the deposit under sub-section (1)

shall be made within such time as the court may fix and in

such manner as may be prescribed and shall be accompanied

by the fee prescribed for the service of notice referred to in

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

sub-section (4). As per the proviso to Section 12(2), the time

fixed by the court for the deposit of the arrears of rent shall

not be less than four weeks from the date of the order and

the time fixed for the deposit of rent which subsequently

accrues due shall not be less than two weeks from the date on

which the rent becomes due. As per Section 12(3) of the Act,

if any tenant fails to pay or to deposit the rent as aforesaid,

the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case

may be, shall, unless the tenant shows sufficient cause to the

contrary, stop all further proceedings and make an order

directing the tenant to put the landlord in possession of the

building. As per Section 12(4), when any deposit is made

under sub-section (1), the Rent Control Court or the Appellate

Authority, as the case may be, shall cause notice of the

deposit to be served on the landlord in the prescribed manner,

and the amount deposited may, subject to such conditions as

may be prescribed, be withdrawn by the landlord on

application made by him to the Rent Control Court or the

Appellate Authority in that behalf.

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

5. The liability of a tenant under Section 12(1) of the

Act, against whom an application for eviction has been made

by a landlord under Section 11, or who prefer an appeal under

Section 18 of the Act, against any order made by the Rent

Control Court on an application made by a landlord under

Section 11, is limited to all arrears of rent admitted by the

tenant to be due in respect of the building, up to the date of

payment or deposit, and he shall continue to pay or deposit

any rent which may subsequently become due in respect of

the building, until the termination of the proceedings before

the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case

may be.

6. The object of the provisions of Section 12(1) of the

Act is to deny the defaulting tenant the right to contest the

application for eviction before the Rent Control Court, or to

prefer an appeal under Section 18 of the Act against any

order made by the Rent Control Court on an application made

by a landlord under Section 11, unless he pays to the

landlord, or deposits with the Rent Control Court or the

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

Appellate Authority, as the case may be, all arrears of rent

admitted by him to be due in respect of the building, up to the

date of payment or deposit, and continues to pay or to

deposit any rent which may subsequently become due in

respect of the building, until the termination of the

proceedings before the Rent Control Court or the Appellate

Authority, as the case may be.

7. Section 12(2) of the Act enjoins a tenant to deposit

the admitted rent under sub-section (1), within such time as

the court may fix and in such manner as may be prescribed.

The time fixed by the court for the deposit of the arrears of

rent and the time fixed for the deposit of rent which

subsequently accrues due shall not be less than that specified

in the proviso to Section 12(2). As per the statutory mandate

of Section 12(1), on an application filed by the landlord under

Section 12, the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority,

as the case may be, has to order payment or deposit of

arrears of rent admitted by the tenant to be due in respect of

the petition schedule building, up to the date of payment or

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

deposit and the tenant shall also be directed to continue to

pay or deposit any rent which may subsequently become due

in respect of the building, until the termination of the

proceedings before the Rent Control Court or the Appellate

Authority, regardless of the relief sought for in that

application.

8. As already noticed hereinbefore, the object of the

provisions of Section 12(1) of the Act is to deny the defaulting

tenant the right to contest the application for eviction before

the Rent Control Court, unless he pays to the landlord, or

deposits with the Rent Control Court, all arrears of rent

admitted by him to be due in respect of the building, up to the

date of payment or deposit, and continues to pay or to

deposit any rent which may subsequently become due in

respect of the building, until the termination of the

proceedings before the Rent Control Court.

9. Having considered the submissions made by the

learned counsel for the petitioners, this Original Petition is

disposed of with the following directions:

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

(i) On receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, the petitioners shall move an application before the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery to advance hearing of I.A.No.1 of 2022 in R.C.A.No.102 of 2018;

(ii) In case the respondent-tenant is yet to file objection in I.A.No.1 of 2022, the same shall be filed within a period of two weeks from the date on which the case is advance as directed above;

(iii) Thereafter, the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery, shall pass appropriate orders in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in R.C.A.No.102 of 2018, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a further period of one month, strictly in accordance with the provisions under Section 12 of the Act.

(iv) Thereafter, the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery shall dispose of R.C.A.No.102 of 2018 within a further period of two month.

Sd/-

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE

Sd/-

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE dkr

O.P.(RC) No.85 of 2022

APPENDIX

PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 30.7.2018 IN RCP NO. 73/2014 PASSED BY RENT CONTROLLER/ MUNSIFF, THALASSERY.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF APPEAL MEMORANDUM SERVED ON THE PETITIONERS DATED 29.9.2018 IN RCA NO. 102/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY (4TH ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE), THALASSERY.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CASE DETAILS OF RCA NO. 102/2018 DOWNLOADED FROM THE WEBSITE OF THE RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF AFFIDAVIT FILED ALONG WITH I.A. NO. 1/2022 IN RCA NO.

                         102/2018 ON THE OF THE RENT CONTROL
                         APPELLATE    AUTHORITY    (4TH ADDL.
                         DISTRICT JUDGE), THALASSERY.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter