Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20323 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 8TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 15677 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
SURESH K.S
AGED 55 YEARS
S/O. LATE SANKARANARAYANA PILLAI, THEKKEKKUTTU
PUTHUPARAMBIL, PULLAD P.O., KOIPURAM, PATHANAMTHITTA
DISTRICT, PIN-689548.
BY ADVS.
P.HARIDAS
BIJU HARIHARAN
P.C.SHIJIN
RISHIKESH HARIDAS
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001.
2 REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
THIRUVALLA, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
THIRUVALLA, PIN-689101.
3 DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT,
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689645.
4 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE
(CONSTITUTED UNDER KERALA CONSERVATION OF PADDY LAND
AND WETLAND ACT, 2008), KOIPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENER & AGRICULTURAL OFFICER,
KRISHI BHAVAN, KOIPURAM, THIRUVALLA, PIN-689531.
5 SECRETARY, KOIPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
KOIPURAM, PULLAD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN-689548.
WP(C) NO. 15677 OF 2021 2
BY ADV M.R.VENUGOPAL
SEI.P.S.APPU GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
30.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 15677 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the respondents to
issue a deemed occupancy certificate to the petitioner as proviso under Rule
20(3) of the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules. There is a further prayer to
command the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on
Ext.P4 application preferred by the petitioner under Section 27A of the
Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned
Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the 5 th
respondent Panchayath.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the
petitioner is the owner in possession of 4.77 ares of property in Re-survey
No.222/8 of Koipuram Village in Pathanamthitta District. It is submitted
that the property is lying as dry land with 50 year old coconut trees and is
not included in the data bank. It is submitted that the petitioner has
submitted Ext.P4 application before the 2nd respondent for putting the
property to other use. The petitioner had also been issued with a building
permit in 2016 for construction of a building in the premises. It is submitted
that after the construction of the building was complete, the petitioner
sought an occupancy certificate and numbering of the building. The
petitioner was told that the numbering can be carried out only after
appropriate orders are obtained from the 2 nd respondent under the
provisions of Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and
Wetland Act, 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since
the building has been constructed on the basis of an approved plan and a
building permit, the petitioner is entitled to a deemed occupancy certificate
in terms of Rule 20(3).
4. The learned Government Pleader submits that the application
submitted by the petitioner in Form 6 under the Kerala Conservation of
Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 can be considered if required time is
granted to the 2nd respondent.
5. The 5th respondent has placed a counter affidavit on record. It is
submitted that the property of the petitioner is shown as 'nilam' in the
Revenue Records and that in the data bank it is shown as 'purayidam'. It is
submitted that after completion of the construction, the petitioner had
submitted an application for numbering and occupancy certificate.
However, it was noticed that since the property was shown as nilam in the
Revenue Records, orders of the 2 nd respondent are required before the
occupancy certificate can be granted.
Having considered the contentions advanced and in view of the fact
that the petitioner had already approached the 2 nd respondent with Ext.P4
application, I am of the opinion that the said application is liable to be
considered and disposed of without delay. There will, accordingly, be a
direction to the 2nd respondent to take up, consider and pass orders on
Ext.P4 application within a period of two months from the date of receipt of
a copy of this judgment, after obtaining due reports from the Village Officer.
The fact that the concerned local authority had considered an application
for building permit submitted by the petitioner and had issued such a
permit would be an additional fact which would show the nature of the
property which is liable to be taken note of by the 2 nd respondent while
passing orders on Ext.P4 application. After orders are obtained by the
petitioner on Ext.P4 application, the request made by him for occupancy
certificate and numbering shall be expeditiously dealt with by the 5 th
respondent without any further delay.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE SVP
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15677/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACTS OF THE DATA BANK.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT NO.C2-
5398/17 DATED 27.12.2016.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 22.6.2021.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 20.7.2021.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE VILLAGE OFFICER DATED 20.7.2021.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.7.2021.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 29.7.2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!