Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 20262 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 September, 2021
iN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNARULAM PRESENT THE RONGURABLE MR. JUSTIOE A.MUBAMED NUSTAOUR & TEE HONOQURARLE DR. JUSTICE KRAUSER EDAPPAGATS THURSDAY, THE 30° DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / OTH ASWINA, 1943 MAT. APPEAL NO. 1689 oF 2015 AGAINST TEE ORDER/SOODGMENT IN O.B NO. 3398/2014 OF FaMTLY COURT, KANNUR APPELLANT / 32 VIJAYAN R., S/O. GOVINDAN, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT KOTTIAL HOUSE, RANNAPURAM CHERURUNNU P.O. , RANNUR ~ G70 301. BY ARVS. SRI. SHATE THOMAS SRI RN. BABY SRI.BINU PAUL SRI.8.RAJESH KOPTAYAM RESPONDENT /S : T.V.REMA, AGED 47 YEARS, D/O NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT THOONOLT ROUSE, CHERURUNNG P.O., BYN ~ 870 301. BY ADV SRI .P.M. PARRETH SHIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD of 30.08 2021, ALONG WITH MAT .APPRAL NOS. 76R/S018 « Fee /2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME RAY DELIVERED °HE FOLLOWING: Mat. Appeal Nog. LOS9/2015 & conn. cases z IN TRE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKUTLAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUBAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KRAUSER EDAPPAGATE THURSDAY, THE 30°" DAY OF SEDTEMRER 2021 / OTR ASWINA WAT. APPEAL NO. 768 OF 2015 AGAINST TRE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.3L8/2013 OF FAMILY couRT, , L843 APPELDANT /S 2 REMA T.V., AGED 42 YEARS, D/O. NARAYANAN, RESIDING AT TROONWOLI ROUSE , RANNSAPUBAM AMSOM DESOw, P.O CRERURUNNY , RANNUR TALUK, KANNUR~-6S70 301, BY AY SRI.P.M. PARESTH RESPONDENT (5: VIGAYAaN K., AGED €3 YEARS, S/O. GOVINDAN, RESIDING at ROTTIVALIL HOUSE, RANNAPURAN AMSON DESON, ¥.O~. CRERURUNNY , RANNOR TALUR, BANNUR-6 79 3202. BY ADvSs , SRI... BABL SELI.BIND PAU SRI .SHAJI THOMAS THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BREW PINALLY EEARD ON 30.09. 2024, ALONG WITH MAT. ADPRAT NOS. LOSsy2o1s8 AND 786/2015, THEE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED TRE ROLLOWING : Mat Appasad Nes. lQSe/203S € comm. cagsea 3 IN THE BIGE COURT OF KERALA AT ERNARUTAM PRESENT SRE SONQURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUBAMED MUSTaAGUR na & THE BONQURABLE DOR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPaAGaTHS THURSDAY, THE 30°8 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 89TH ASWINA, 1943 # MAT APPEAL NO. 78S OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.P .NO.140/2023 OF PAMTLY COURT o RATER. APPELLANT /S- REMA T.¥., AGED 4€3 YEARS, D/O. NARAYANAN, B/A. THOONOLT ROUSE , BARNAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, P.O. CHERITRUNNU, SANSUR TARUR, RANNUR-S70301 | BY ADY SRI.P.M. PAREETH RESPONDENT /S: VIJAYAN K, AGED 43 YRARS, S/O. GOVINDAN, R/A.KOTYIYALIL HOUSE, BAMNAPURAM AMSOM DESOM, P O CHERUKUNNU, KANNUR TALUK, KANNUR-670301. BY ANVS. SRI .R. BABU SRI BING BAGEL SRI .SRATI THOMAS SHIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL SAVING BEEN FINALLY #EARD oN 30.08.2022, ALONG WITH MAT. APPEAT NOS.2O58/2618 Asp TEB/S015, THE COURT ON TRE SAME DAY DRLIVERED vex FOLLOWING : Mat. Appeal Sos. 105S/2028 & camn. cases 4 JUDGMENT
iMat .Appaal Mog. 1059/2015, F88/2018, F886 / 2015)
A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.
Mat. Appeal No.768 of 2015 was filed aggrieved by the preliminary decree passed allowing the claim for partition fled by the respondent.
& Mat. Appeal No.786 of 2018 was filed by the same appellant in Mat Appeal No.768 of 2015 agerieved by the dismissal of a petition for declaration that the settlement deed No.7 85/2008 of SRO, Kalliassery is void.
3S. The respondent in the above cases filed Mat Appeal No. TOS9/2015 challenging the dismissal of a petition for divorce
fled by hint
Pending matter, we referred the parties for mediation at the Mediation Sub Centre, Kannur. The parties have arrived af a
seiflement. The setflement agreement along with the report of
Mat.dgpeal Nes. 2080/2018 s conn. cases 5
the mediator is on board. The parties have decided to separate marital tie by a mutual divorce. The parties also have agreement in regard to other clairns.
in the light of the settlement, we dispose of these appeals recording the settlement. The mediation agreement will form part of the judement. The parties have fo work out their remedy based on the settlement as above.
Sd/~ A.MURAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE
Sd/~-
DR. KRAUSER EDAPPAGATE, JUDGE
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24 AND 25 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE (MEDIATION) RULES 2005 MEDIATION SUB CENTRE: _ KANNUR
x > . a ies Sot fy i ae t ef Fes mee So oo Sees.
Dead fapprcel 240 o_--e fs hl OT : : o vee STORE OO 8 st eee fe oy Shae x Mad gonad ap (OSES Ne oF Ranenex
Vijayan. K : Plaintiffs/Petitioners/ Complainants /Appellants Ves.
Rema. T.V : Defendant/s/Respondents/s
Accused
The parties above named beq to submit as follows:
1. The aforesaid S§vit/s, Patition/s, Appeal/s Complaint were referred to mediation for resolving the dispute between the parties. In the course of mediation, they have resolved their dispute and have agreed to the following terms and conditions.
{1) anameslenoaange aGvOHkdcOshwwye mporilmame: aox DIAGOD} SITs Cay Akedled ageqtnog' DoocsnageaiacIad GoOaNangan' sag
"MY a
MygGange amMimanjaowanod qeskmaaneniad okny alloca adap
aorminet 18 sof ORD (uerIdagsS avouMam ORo OGIO aaaall HMIGS QsgosM ee»vsrasl agonoske, cnaded cRoaosmmoe cadaes3 EMOIQOOD Zo ocuBadl 20,903,202) ay agonal cncdangcoasgs aflodis aoa fAbGO8s Geos aagenome: ace) coms oe.card ciicioacancrs os BaGallGlamoacpzs Oskagaradign.
(12) [email protected] wings afhOids.welltpgrsaMgs Os aconemansios LIS
SNe
3,
COCA CHARI ENOOLA MOANA BaAQe OMadpeenceafeics gosisassnianead GaWiahed Gand Gatpncasepgecr aundiog omperdind Boke QGIBHZOigo Menoegad! avayy eeiinieoofladinar 795/2008-c0 DIAS GOMODIB{oldVIVe oVAMOMlOa Ocal Ays WYSom) Os.acws oOrmeisleangan arnkogahed aoemienaecngas Godiensen ad ake.gd
a
GBUAHWIO af MLAB Wgo oG HAG EhOmMewgaS yo AIP
te
sete
z oS os oe so
aw
atleale, Gila, alka aganladesy) Gamawoas Manon" madegaoad eOORIANIGAS TWAIAN{eMgo Haysegad! aos' aallac}saadldioa 1528/2006-So CDOS MAIO AG{aleIae AND RTBIA AHQGIN Qo atporaas OAMIIYZNSINAs Aygo Hac arcawslidlanwn @ 1/4 ero owaviosg hod ugmidaaviengss cgoskesocm and a LOS) GEM aoceh AIG Hoag] Gade Hansen' coadengaord afiOlscrarailongs coo Wy asad Gawd aoa aosipgem olhaacscoee aim <pcast) (PHhGGe Maas coee.gewIy awa Mes avasve aailadisoadiavkes Sak QMlus DaniKoy Nema sgemoosmarnges waco afacah SAkMGs o2td allal) goody' angs) adawas agegack @Mland allago aowadlano Gad obOapersmomsnay atooileyy. Grp knoe malgnd oaKggan engpod Gacboeangods -- alislaagangao COO TNEge sagas HCO [email protected] 6 1/4 Saosin cAGEad cacRaIe aGEM yr @MhD{e aglatiso. dike' asion' BOOS Oo AGAIAA age WII Gos MOOOd maosl modeggn dlotma craigs OOerIoATAMOCIe cokmuasler,
(i223) HAIRS Dass aeaosaiicoling: ao. avl eso/e017 alka (HOD SOOM GD Beys aposiwsamowdwnansings rKMaIgdariio CHO @acd allaopap. Sho ail an' COISAGHM™RS 285,03 9000 Agcnenns 24.08, 2021 OIOWOYSS snes!) allucl' GWesy, 60,000/~ LerngaTtooauikes} GOgwo, ANG Mhoadakay faknIGe ae.cdan" somnd anwidmeadl wae
$
ARID BVeGD Glagte Ne els} cemocley, GoBaae Gharrosokoa
HAO Atos) GCUDIGOR A. adawlenoaced BehGIS MOO ce eras ne on x a = aye eeicr RAY ten EWR TI Bye cy wt Sh Yr +} ny
(SOMRMaAIG S.owMHoy sradsamanoasmay aicanslgp.
(2V) asd cio, slofkoyos aadked 2.50,000/ (ems skago} Qrgalss
{(HOWaAlQACHRWOALODEDIPS AS Hera IQoogIN harold
ODSMENISAG aVRemDerlage seoamcaoteyc eawosied ocudaaeatels
BokKWEN a_jel iw Gass! of cera aoreaihen' apmae.zmou! ig) 4
Qo
VPONdacaea Oar) aAoszenem dloidcs cnadecnenecmomeman adlvanoll Qs.
{(v) soaslenaanad caudled andidenasl coadenancngo alow' DAMOAIgMgaorp Nodoke oflasmMesaikes smMsanca aor!' atooelilys MWD AACGOTSHGMHG .oemlaensaan cdlaslosoilncnains coosesln GRAMOs apwesikanoe cGanga3zaacn!l ofhagaomagamoejcnelas aHOVBAAaAAGS) GHAaAwIeAI arsoollea ns Leon qoaadilalangawg, {vi} caod aoayoadamysoensios adleciaaas AGO SepIogehB2o ADOT go afBNVAIS WOOIDAIAIWa SHAOIOMANO A IMAI woortedkod Gand Soayxscdorny aMosninwWlef MIGiy7K8Z akAONaeKo GHIA BRICHO GHUDI Ganga WarSGhooaead sfoilen ofa' cocail
AGRI alAdVokBa BIH g]g AZsUMAMEos KID VOEren|ggago qoaanoilyf
Sleogcrng.
(vii) eaod Gikegaomancd Soaanoday" Sates sm.ogaomaAag
DAacoGanusail agwmoma» owcailiclenjan aadeaoeiennd coedlegea cd Mat.A No. 76/2015, 786/2015, 1059/2018 AUN manu sodaiaa 8S CMOHSINAT SUoOHZaAMONZ [email protected] MAGagdgpe eanoawslaieig MEHOMARIING,
2. In view cf the aforesaid agreement entered inte between the parties, the parties pray that the suit/s, Petition/s be decreed/dismissed/disposed of in terms of the aforesaid agreement.
3. in view of the aforesaid agreement, the plaintiff/s,
applicant/s prays for refund of the full institution fee.
4. Partles WLLL [email protected] GR oo eccwsssaenmenenn the Hon' ble x oN
oHseawas. Oob
oa. sLay
when
Court for passing Orders/Decrea in terms of the above said
agreement,
eu } Ny , PR Plaintiffs/Petitioners/ Defandant/s, Respondents Appellants /Complainant/s Accused/s"
¥ S Sa Ne ~ AS
a . SS.
Kedvecate for Plaintiffs/ Advocate for Defendant/s , Petitioners/Appellants/ Respondents, Accused/s Complainants VERIFICATION
We, the parties above named do hereby solemnly state and declare that what is contained in paragraphs 1 {i} te {vii} are true to the best of our knowledge, information
and balief.
"sy y be
oN 2 ¢ % t
Plaintiffs/Petitioners/ Appellants/Complainant/s
S, ' aN x :
wnat
weet
x SP Narre " Y Defendant/s, Respondents Accused) s Place: Kannur
Date:18.03.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!