Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Sigamani vs The Transport Commissioner
2021 Latest Caselaw 19653 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19653 Ker
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
R.Sigamani vs The Transport Commissioner on 17 September, 2021
WP(C) No.17790/2021                        1/4

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                         PRESENT
                      THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
            Friday, the 17th day of September 2021 / 26th Bhadra, 1943
                              WP(C) NO. 17790 OF 2021
   PETITIONER:

          R.SIGAMANI, W/O. RAMALINGAM, 1/167, NORTH STREET, NORTH
          POINGAINALLUR, NAGAPPATTINAM DISTRICT, TAMILNADU REPRESENTED BY HER
          POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, R.PRABAHARAN, S/O. RAMALINGAM, DOOR
          NO.78,PERUMAL SOUTH STREET, NAGAPATTINAM, TAMILNADU-611 001

   RESPONDENTS:

      1. THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER, TRANS TOWERS, VAZHUTHACAUD,
         THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014
      2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, PALAKKAD-678 001
      3. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, NAGAPATTINAM, TAMILNADU-611 001
      4. REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, COIMBATORE CENTRAL, COIMBATORE, TAMIL
         NADU-641 018
      5. NATIONAL INFORMATICS CENTRE, CIVIL STATION, THRIKKAKARA, KAKKANAD,
         KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, PIN-682 030
      6. THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
         GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, TRANSPORT
         BHAVAN, 1 SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110 001
      7. SMT. RADHA SWAMINATHAN, PROPRIETOR, HARIHARASUDHAN TRANSPORT, 215 E,
         PARSON GANPATH APARTMENTS, SHASTRI ROAD, RAM NAGAR, COIMBATORE,
         TAMIL NADU DISTRICT-641 009


        Writ petition (civil) praying inter alia that in the circumstances
   stated in the affidavit filed along with the WP(C) the High Court be
   pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P10 order and
   be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to lift the blacklisting of
   vehicle mentioned in Exhibit P4, pending disposal of the writ petition.


        This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and
   the affidavit filed in support of WP(C) and upon hearing the arguments of
   M/S.G.HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.HARIHARAN, SMITHA PRAVEEN & V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR,
   Advocates for the petitioner,and GOVERNMENT PLEADER for Respondents 1 to
   3, and of ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA for Respondents 5 and 6 the
   court passed the following:
 WP(C) No.17790/2021                          2/4




                               BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
                               ----------------------------------------
                                   WP(C) No. 17790 of 2021
                               ----------------------------------------
                           Dated this the 17th day of September, 2021


                                           ORDER

After hearing the learned Counsel for the petitioner as

well as the learned senior Government Pleader, I am satisfied

that the petitioner has made out a case worth admitting.

Hence, this writ petition is admitted.

The learned Government Pleader takes notice on behalf

of respondents 1 to 3. Issue notice to respondents 4 and 7.

The learned Assistant Solicitor General of India takes notice on

behalf of respondents 5 and 6.

Ext.P10 is the impugned order. It is issued pursuant to

the directions of this Court in Ext.P5 judgment. I am, prima

facie, satisfied that Ext.P10 is bereft of any material

particulars about the basis on which the vehicle is liable to

suffer motor vehicle tax in Kerala that too to the extend of the WP(C) No.17790/2021 3/4

WP(C)No.17790 of 2021

amount mentioned in Ext.P10. However, since the vehicle

cannot be permitted to ply on the roads without payment of

tax, it is directed that the petitioner shall pay under protest,

the amount of Rs.8,64,000/- as Kerala Motor Vehicle Tax for

the vehicle TN-66 E-5959 and remove blacklisting if any,

forthwith. By this direction, it is not to be understood that this

Court has considered the question.

The amount so deposited by the petitioner shall carry

interest at bank rate from the date of deposit till its return, if

petitioner is ultimately found not liable to pay the said tax

amount. Whenever non-payment of Motor Vehicle Tax will

entail blacklisting, that question will be considered at the

appropriate stage.

Sd/-

                                                    BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
                                                           JUDGE
        AJ/17.09.2021




17-09-2021                      /True Copy/                         Assistant Registrar
 WP(C) No.17790/2021                 4/4

                       APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17790/2021
Exhibit P4            TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF FITNESS DATED

03.01.2020 RELATING TO VEHICLE NO. TN-66 E-5959 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 1699/2021 DATED 12.03.2021 Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.05.2021 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter