Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19293 Ker
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 23RD BHADRA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 3822 OF 2021
(IN CRIME NO. 3822 OF 2021 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT)
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 181/2014 OF SUB COURT, KANNUR, KANNUR
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1 to 6:
1 NISHAD.V.K
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O. SASI, ALLAKKOT HOUSE, KARAMEL, VELLUR AMSOM VELLUR P.O,
PAYYANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
2 MITHUN A
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O. BALAN, ALLAKKOT HOUSE, KARAMEL, VELLUR AMSOM VELLUR P.O,
PAYYANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
3 SUBIN K
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O. SURENDRAN, KARAYIL HOUSE, KANDOTH, VELLUR AMSOM, VELLUR P.O,
PAYYANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
4 VISHOB V
AGED 29 YEARS
S/O. VIJAYAN, KANNADA HOUSE, KANDOTH, VELLUR AMSOM VELLUR P.O,
PAYYANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
5 SANOOP K, S/O. PADMANABHAN,
AGED 29 YEARS
KANNAADA HOUSE, KANDOTH, VELLUR AMSOM, VELLUR P.O, PAYYANNUR
TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
6 PRAVEEN.V.V, S/O PAVITHRAN
AGED 31 YEARS
VALIYAVEEDU HOUSE, KANDOTH, VELLUR AMSOM VELLUR P.O, PAYYANNUR
TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
BY ADV B.MUHAMMED SHAHEEL
RESPONDENTS/STATE, DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM, COCHIN - 682031, (INVESTIGATING OFFICER IN CRIME NO. 946/2012
OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT).
2 ROOPESH
AGED 45 YEARS
Crl.M.C.No.3822 of 2021
2
S/O. VASU, ANGADIKKARAN HOUSE, ANNUR, VELLUR AMSOM, ANNUR P.O,
PAYYANNUR TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT, PINCODE - 670307.
BY ADVS.
K.REEHA KHADER
VIMAL T.S.
SR.PP - SRI. RENJITH T.R.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.09.2021, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.3822 of 2021
3
ORDER
Petitioners are the accused in Crime No.946 of 2012 of
Payyannur police station, which was registered alleging offence
punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 308 read
with Section 149 of the IPC. On conclusion of investigation,
charge sheet has been laid and now the case is pending before the
Assistant Sessions Court Payyannur as S.C.No. 181 of 2014.
Petitioners claim that the matter is settled with the 2 nd respondent,
the defacto complainant, injured and the 2Nd respondent does not
want to pursue the proceedings. On that ground, entire proceedings
are sought to be quashed. The petitioners also produced an affidavit
of the 2nd respondent shown as Annexure-2.
2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the
learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
3. According to the learned Senior Public Prosecutor the 1st
accused has numerous crimes registered against him between 2012
and 2016. But according to the counsel for the petitioners, all were
political crimes, that he is a leader of a political party. According
to the learned counsel, the petitioners are youngsters, that due to Crl.M.C.No.3822 of 2021
the pendency of the case some of them are unable to move out of
the country and that so long as the dispute is settled, the
proceedings may be quashed.
4. It is true that the 1st petitioner, 1st accused has many other
crimes registered against him. But having gone through the nature
of the allegations against the petitioners and despite the fact that
Section 308 of the IPC is alleged, it seems that the 2nd respondent
did not sustain any serious injuries. The charge sheet indicates that
while he was riding a motor cycle, the petitioners in prosecution of
their common object formed an unlawful assembly, intercepted
him and the 1st accused tried to attack him with a wooden stick on
his head, had the stick hit on his head, that would have turned fatal.
That was how Section 308 of the IPC was incorporated. It does not
seem that he had suffered any serious injuries. Now he has
condoned the acts of the petitioners and stated in unambiguous
terms that he does not want to pursue the proceedings; he has no
objection in quashing the proceedings. Moreover, by giving stamp
of approval to the settlement, public interests are not prejudiced. In
the circumstances since the injured himself has joined the Crl.M.C.No.3822 of 2021
petitioners in canvassing for quashing the proceedings, the Court
cannot refuse to exercise its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the
Cr.P.C.
5. In the result the Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed
and all proceedings pending before the Assistant Sessions Court
Payyannur as S.C. 181 of 2014 are here by quashed.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed as above.
Sd/-
K.HARIPAL JUDGE RMV/14/09/2021 Crl.M.C.No.3822 of 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 3822/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.
946/2012 OF PAYYANNUR POLICE STATION, KANNUR DISTRICT PENDING BEFORE THE ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT, PAYYANNUR AS SC NO. 181/2014.
Annexure A2 THE AFFIDAVIT SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!