Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19108 Ker
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 22ND BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 18747 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ALFRED C.S.,
AGED 70 YEARS
S/O. SAMUAL, RESIDING AT CHETTUNGAL, PUNJATHODE ROAD,
VATTEKUNNAM, EDAPPALLY, NORTH P.O., ERNAKULAM 682 024.
BY ADV BINDU SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ,
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, KOCHI 682 024.
2 THE VICE CHANCELLOR,
COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI 682
022.
3 STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TO THE GOVERNMENT, HIGHER
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695 001.
4 THE ACCOUNT GENERAL (A &E),
KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
(HG), LOCAL FUND AUDIT, UNIVERSITY AUDIT WING, COCHIN
UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, OFFICE OF THE COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, KOCHI 682 022.
OTHER PRESENT:
GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 18747 OF 2021
-2-
JUDGMENT
Order Ext.P9 dated 02.11.2020 of Cochin University of
Science and Technology rejecting the grant of salary of higher
scale has been assailed. Learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the respondents had not taken into consideration the
orders Exts.P6 & P7 and passed order Ext.P9 without affording
any opportunity, much less it lacks cogent reasons.
2. The relevant portion of order Ext.P9 reads as under:
"Your application received as mentioned above has been referred to the Grievance Redressal Committee of the Unviersity by order of the Vice-Chancellor.
16.10.2020 in the Grievance Redressal Committee, after reviewing your application in detail with the relevant rules, recommended that your application be rejected and approved by the Vice-Chancellor. Under the current rules, all the benefits that can be given to you, provided by the University."
3. On perusal of the order extracted above, it is evident
that neither any opportunity of hearing afforded nor any reasons
have been shown as to how and under what circumstances the
reliefs as sought for by the petitioner has been rejected. WP(C) NO. 18747 OF 2021
Authorities at the helm of affairs are legitimately expected to pass
reasoned orders that too, in compliance of the principles of natural
justice. Accordingly, order Ext.P9 is quashed. Writ petition is
allowed. Respondents are directed to afford the petitioner an
opportunity of hearing before passing the order on the prayer
seeking higher scale determination and pass a detailed order
assigning the reasons. Let this exercise be undertaken within a
period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of
the judgment.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE vv WP(C) NO. 18747 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18747/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES DATED 15.5.1993 OF THE MEETING OF THE SYNDICATE.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6/4/2010 IN WPC NUMBER 23191/2005 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 4/8/2014 IN 1445/2010 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.2.2011 IN WPC 11730/2010.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT WPC 23792/2016 DATED 1/8/2018 IN PRODUCED.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. AD.G3/35/87 DATED 21.2.2019 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE MOHANDAS COMMITTEE REPORT DATED 27.12.2003.
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 28.3.2019 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02.11.2020 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE CARDIAC SURGEON DATED 1/9/2021.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!