Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18878 Ker
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 19TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 13339 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
DAKSHAYANI AMMA K. P.
AGED 78 YEARS
W/O. LATE K. K. RAGHAVA PODUVAL, NEAR KSEB
SUBSTATION, KANKOL P. O., PAYYANNUR (VIA), KANNUR
- 670 307.
BY ADVS.
K.P.PRADEEP
HAREESH M.R.
RASMI NAIR T.
T.T.BIJU
T.THASMI
ANOOPA
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE
DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KANNUR
CIVIL STATION, KANNUR - 670002.
3 THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR
LAND ACQUISITION GENERAL (EZHIMALA NAVEL ACADEMY)
LA OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, THALASSERY, KANNUR
- 670101.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 10.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 13339 OF 2021 2
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court
seeking a direction to respondents 1, 2 and 3 to
disburse the additional enhanced amount awarded to
her, as per Ext.P9, along with statutory interest
thereon upto the date of disbursement. She has also
sought a declaration that, in addition to the
enhanced compensation amounts awarded in Ext.P9, she
is entitled to statutory interest for the delay in
payment of compensation, at the rate of 15% per
annum; and seeks a direction to respondents 1 to 3
to effect the same, within a time frame to be fixed
by this Court.
2. The afore submissions of Dr.K.P.Pradeep,
made on behalf of the petitioner, were met by
Smt.Amminikutty - learned Senior Government Pleader,
saying that the enhanced compensation has already
been disbursed to the petitioner and that all which
is now remaining is the consideration of her prayer
for payment of interest. She submitted that,
therefore, if the petitioner, or her authorized
representative, appears before the competent
respondent on a date to be fixed by this Court, said
Authority will consider the same and issue
appropriate orders without any avoidable delay.
3. In reply, Shri.K.P.Pradeep submitted that the
obligation to pay interest is not something that can
be left to the discretion of the competent Authority
and that it is enjoined upon them to do so. He
relied for substantiation on the judgments of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of India and another
v. Pradeep Kumari and Others [AIR 1995 SC 2259] and
of this Court in Koruthukochukutty v. State of
Kerala [2000 (1) KLT 26]. He thus reiteratingly
prayed that this Court direct the competent
respondent to immediately consider the payment of
interest to his client. He then submitted that if
this Court is, on the contrary, inclined to direct
his client or her authorized representative to
appear before the competent respondent, then she is
willing to do so; however, praying that the
Authority be directed to consider her request,
adverting implicitly to the above precedents.
4. There can be no doubt that if the petitioner
is entitled statutorily to the benefit of interest,
then the competent Authorities are obligated to
consider and allow the same. However, I do not
propose to speak affirmatively one way or the other
on this issue at this time, and deem it appropriate
to accede to the suggestion of Smt.K.Amminikutty and
to direct the petitioner, or her authorized
representative, to appear before the competent
respondent for this purpose.
Resultantly, I order this writ petition and
direct the petitioner, or her authorized
representative, to mark appearance before the 3rd
respondent - Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition
General, at 11.00 a.m. on 27.09.2010; on which day,
said Authority will hear her or her representative
and decide on the request for interest, adverting
specifically to the afore precedents as also the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Union of
India and Another v. Pushpavathi and Others
[2018(1) KHC 891], which declares the manner in
which such claims have to be decided by the
competent Authorities.
If the competent respondent finds the
petitioner entitled to interest as prayed for, then
same be disbursed to her at the earliest, but not
later than thee months from the date of receipt of a
copy of this judgment.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE MC/10.9
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13339/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD NOTICE IN FORM NO.10 NO. A 753/83 DATED 9.3.1984 ISSUED BY THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, LA NO.II, NAVAL ACADEMY, RAMANTHALI.
Exhibit P1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD NOTICE IN FORM NO.10 NO. A 665/83 DATED 28.05.1984 ISSUED BY THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, LA NO.II, NAVAL ACADEMY, RAMANTHALI.
Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C.1531/05 DATED 30.05.2009 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.C.1531/05 (2) DATED 24.04.2009 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 15.04.2016 UNDER SECTION 28A(1) FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN RELATION TO EXT. P1.
Exhibit P3(a) TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 15.04.2016 UNDER SECTION 28A(1) FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN RELATION TO EXT. P2.
Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.01.2017 IN WP(C) NO.31305 OF 2016.
Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER REF.
NO.DCKNR/12861/2017-C2 DATED 21.08.2017 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. REF.G 2500/16 DATED 7.4.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 09.07.2018 IN WP(C) NO.20360 OF 2018.
Exhibit P8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.REF G 2500/16 DATED 15.12.2018 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P9 TRUE COPY OF AWARD NO.REF.
DCKNR/10250/2018-C2 DATED 31.10.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P10 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.REF G 2377/18 DATED 03.09.2019 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P11 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS ON 04.12.2018 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!