Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kokulnath K.K.S vs District Collector
2021 Latest Caselaw 18774 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18774 Ker
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2021

Kerala High Court
Kokulnath K.K.S vs District Collector on 9 September, 2021
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                  PRESENT
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
     THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 18TH BHADRA, 1943
                          WP(C) NO. 1568 OF 2021
PETITIONERS:

     1     KOKULNATH K.K.S, AGED 41 YEARS
           S/O.SHANMUKHAVEL, NEW NO.19, OLD NO.82,
           SNR NAGAR, DHALI ROAD, UDUMALPET, TAMILNADU.

     2     ARCHANA KAMAL, AGED 37 YEARS
           D/O.K.A.KAMALASANAN, NEW NO.19, OLD NO.82,
           SNR NAGAR, DHALI ROAD, UDUMALPET, TAMILNADU.

           BY ADV L.RAJESH NARAYAN IYER


RESPONDENTS:

     1     DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, COLLECTORATE,
           KUYILIMALA, PAINAV P.O., IDUKKI-685603.

     2     TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, PEERMADE, PEERMADE RD,
           AZHUTHA, PEERMADE-685531.

     3     VILLAGE OFFICER, VAGAMON VILLAGE,
           PULLIKKANAM-ELAPPARA ROAD, VAGAMON-685503.

     4     SECRETARY, ELAPPARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ELAPPARA,
           IDUKKI-685501.

           BY ADVS.
           SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER
           SRI.FIROZ K.ROBIN
           SRI.PIOUS MATHEW
           SRI.ROY JOSEPH
           SMT.ANIES MATHEW
           SRI.E.HARIDAS
           SMT.K.AMMINIKKUTTY - SR GP


     THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 WPC 1568/21
                                        2



                             JUDGMENT

When this matter was called today,

Sri.L.Rajesh Narayan Iyer - learned counsel for

the petitioners and Sri.Aswin Sethumadhavan -

learned Senior Government Pleader, were ad idem

that this Court has already considered issues

similar to the ones urged in this Writ Petition

and has found in favour of the petitioner therein,

in the judgment in W.P(C)No.14938/2021.

2. However, Sri.L.Rajesh Narayan Iyer

submitted that there is a small factual difference

in this case, when compared to the facts noticed

in the afore Writ Petition, namely that the

purchase certificate involved herein is not

included in the list of ones over which an enquiry

is being conducted by the competent Authority.

3. I have examined the judgment

aforementioned and am convinced that the factual

circumstances pleaded in this Writ Petition are at WPC 1568/21

par with those which were noticed by this Court in

W.P(C)No.14938/2021.

4. I am, therefore, of the firm view that the

petitioners herein must also obtain the same

reliefs as has been granted to the petitioner in

W.P(C)No.14938/2021, pertinently when they contend

that the purchase certificate relating to their

property is not subjected to investigation now.

In the afore circumstances, I allow this Writ

Petition and direct the 3rd respondent-Village

Officer to permit the petitioners to remit the

basic tax of the property and to further issue

possession certificate with respect to the same

which is comprised of 5.17 Ares in Sy No.724 of

Vagamon Village, which is covered by Ext.P1, as

expeditiously as is possible, but not later than

two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment; with a consequential direction to

the 4th respondent-Secretary of the Grama

Panchayath to consider the petitioners' request WPC 1568/21

for building permit without any avoidable delay

once they produce the tax receipt and possession

certificate before him.

Needless to say, the afore directions cannot

be construed by the petitioners or anyone else

that the rights of the competent Authority to

proceed against the purchase certificate relating

to the property in question - if it becomes so

warranted in future - has, in any manner, been

impeded; and I make it clear that all such rights

are left open to be decided for the said Authority

in terms of law, however, following due procedure.

Sd/-

RR                                     DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
                                            JUDGE
 WPC 1568/21


               APPENDIX OF WP(C) 1568/2021

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT P1        TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED

NO.3049/2017/I DATED 22.11.2017.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGE OF THE PATTA NO.501/92.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 20.11.2019.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE BASIC TAX RECEIPT DATED 18.06.2020.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.A5-10564/19 DATED 28.01.2020.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A5-10564/19 DATED 28.1.2020.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19.06.2020.

EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10.06.2020.

EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.01.2020 IN WPC NO.27740/2019.

EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.08.2020 IN WPC NO.14768/2020.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter