Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18588 Ker
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 17TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 16422 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
ELDO.M.T
AGED 35 YEARS
S/O. THOMAS, MATTAPALLIYILVEEDU, MRUGASHUPATHRIPADI,
KANIYAMBATTA P.O, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANAD P.O, 673122.
BY ADV B.S.SURESH (CHIRAKKARA)
RESPONDENTS:
1 DISTRICT COLLECTOR
CIVIL STATION, NORTH KALPATTA P.O, WAYANAD PIN - 673122.
2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, KUMBALAKKAD, KANIYAMBATTA
P.O, PIN - 673122.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT. SURYA BINOY. B. SR. G.P.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
08.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 16422 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:-
"(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to release the vehicle bearing Registration No.KL12N3050 Tipper lorry to the possession of the petitioner, as there is no contravention of the provisions of Sand Act."
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned Government Pleader.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that the petitioner's tipper lorry bearing Reg.No.KL12N3050 was
taken into custody by the 2nd respondent on 13.07.2021 alleging
illegal transportation of river sand. It is submitted that the
petitioner has submitted Ext.P4 request before the District
Collector for release of the vehicle pointing out that there was no
violation of law or any illegal transportation of river sand as
alleged and that the sand had been purchased by the petitioner
for the construction of a room in his residential premises. It is
further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no WP(C) NO. 16422 OF 2021
Mahazar had been prepared and a copy of the same had also not
been served on the petitioner as provided in Sub-rule 2 of Rule 27
of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal
of Sand Rules, 2002. It is submitted that the said application is
liable to be considered in accordance with law.
4. The learned Government Pleader submits that a
Mahazar had been prepared, but whether a copy of the same had
been handed over to the petitioner is not clear.
5. In any view of the matter, since the petitioner has
approached the 1st respondent with Ext.P4 request for release of
the vehicle and has submitted his objections to the seizure and
confiscation of the vehicle, I am of the opinion that the same is
liable to be considered, in accordance with law. The specific
contention of the petitioner that no seizure Mahazar had been
prepared and that copy of the same had not been served on the
petitioner shall also be considered by the 1 st respondent while
considering Ext.P4 request. Ext.P4 request shall be considered by
the 1st respondent with notice to the petitioner and after hearing WP(C) NO. 16422 OF 2021
him, through any appropriate means including video conferencing
within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE bng/09.09.2021 WP(C) NO. 16422 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 16422/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 THE COPY OF THE GOODS PERMIT IN RESPECT OF THE VEHICLE SEIZED DATED 27.11.2020.
Exhibit P2 THE CARD ISSUED BY THE KANIYABATTA BLOCK PANCHAYATH IN THE NAME OF THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER REGARDING THE FINANCIAL HELP OF HOUSING SCHEME DATED NIL.
Exhibit P3 THE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE ONGOING CONSTRUCTION OF HIS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING IS PRODUCED.
Exhibit P4 THE COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 2.8.21.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!