Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18157 Ker
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 12TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 17811 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
C.P.NAZEER
AGED 51 YEARS
S/O.PAREED, CHALAYIL HOUSE, EAST VELIYATHUNADU, U.C.
COLLEGE P.O., ALUVA.
BY ADVS.
B.S.SURESH KUMAR
GEORGE SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 ALUVA MUNICIPALITY
REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, ALUVA, KERALA, PIN 683 101
2 THE SECRETARY
ALUVA MUNICIPALITY, ALUVA, KERALA, PIN 683 101
3 THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF ALUVA MUNICIPALITY,
REP.BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, ALUVA, KERALA 683 101
BY ADV THE ALUVA MUNICIPALITY
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.K.T.THOMAS-SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
03.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 17811 OF 2021
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking directions to the
respondents to drop all proceedings pursuant to Ext.P4 and to
return the amounts received from the petitioner referred to in
Exts.P1 and P2.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned learned counsel appearing for the respondent
Municipality.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner
that in an auction conducted for license to manage and run the
comfort station at vegetable market of the Municipality for the
period 2020-2021, the petitioner was the successful bidder and an
amount of Rs.1,08,840/- had been paid by the petitioner by
Exts.P1 and P2. It is submitted that due to the COVID-19
pandemic, the vegetable market where the comfort the station is
situated was not functioning and that the petitioner was,
therefore, unable to collect any amounts as provided in the WP(C) NO. 17811 OF 2021
contract. The petitioner has submitted Exts.P5 to P7
representations before the respondents and seeks a consideration
thereof.
5. Having heard the learned Standing Counsel also, I am of
the opinion that the request made by the petitioner for return of
EMD and the contract amount paid by the petitioner requires a
consideration at the hands of the respondents after verifying the
facts.
6. There will, accordingly, be a direction to the 1 st
respondent to take up, consider and pass appropriate orders on
Ext.P5 representation preferred by the petitioner with notice to
the petitioner and after hearing him through any appropriate
means including video conferencing within a period of six weeks
from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
This writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/-
ANU SIVARAMAN JUDGE bng/03.09.2021 WP(C) NO. 17811 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17811/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 16.3.2020 SHOWING PAYMENT OF RS.93,840/- ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 13.3.2020 SHOWING PAYMENT OF RS.15,000/- AS EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT.
Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24.8.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS RECEIPT.
Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 31.3.2021 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER
Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.7.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.7.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.7.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P8 A TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SHOWING THE RECEIPT OF THE REPRESENTATION BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SHOWING THE RECEIPT OF THE REPRESENTATION BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
WP(C) NO. 17811 OF 2021
Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD SHOWING THE RECEIPT OF THE REPRESENTATION BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!