Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hassainar K vs Kerala State Co-Operative Bank
2021 Latest Caselaw 23652 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23652 Ker
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Hassainar K vs Kerala State Co-Operative Bank on 30 November, 2021
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                        PRESENT
                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
   TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 9TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
                              WP(C) NO. 27052 OF 2021
PETITIONER:

       1          HASSAINAR K.,
                  AGED 52 YEARS
                  S/O. AMOO, CHEYUMBA HOUSE, PERIYATTADUKKAM, PANAYAL,
                  KASARAGODE 672 318.

       2          SUHARA A K.,
                  AGED 50 YEARS
                  S/O. AMOO, CHEYUMBA HOUSE, PERINYATTADUKKAM, PANAYAL,
                  KASARAGOD 671 318.

                  BY ADVS.
                  BASIL MATHEW
                  SARASWATHI PALEREKEEZHIL



RESPONDENTS:

       1          KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK,
                  POPUALARILY KNOWN AS KERALA BANK (ERSTWHILE DISTRICT
                  CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, KASARAGOD), REP. BY ITS
                  AUTHORIZED OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, KASARGODE CPSE,
                  NAYAKS ROAD, KASARGODE 671 121.

       2          THE BRANCH MANAGER,
                  KERALA STATE COOPERATIVE BANK,
                  POPUALARILY KNOWN AS KERALA BANK (ERSTWHILE DISTRICT
                  CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, KASARAGOD),PALLIKKARE BRANCH,
                  PALLIKKARE P.O., KASARGODE DISTRICT- 671 316.

                  BY ADV. M.SASINDRAN-SC.




THIS       WRIT    PETITION   (CIVIL)   HAVING    COME   UP   FOR   ADMISSION   ON
30.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
   WP(C) NO. 27052 OF 2021
                               2

                BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
            =======================
                W.P.(C) No.27052 of 2021
                 -------------------------------
          Dated this the 30th day of November, 2021

                        JUDGMENT

Petitioners as borrower from the respondent-Bank,

has committed default in repayment. Consequently,

proceedings have been initiated by the Bank for recovery

of the amounts due.

2. During the course of hearing, petitioners have

confined the relief to an opportunity for repaying the

overdue amount in instalments and to obtain

regularisation of the loan account. c

3. It was submitted on behalf of the respondent-

Bank that petitioners committed default in repayment and

the overdue amount is Rs.40,61,300/-. It was further

submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been

initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent Bank

is willing to accept repayment of the overdue amount in

limited instalments and regularise the loan account.

4. I have heard Sri.Basil Mathew, the learned WP(C) NO. 27052 OF 2021

counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri.M.Sasindran,,

learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

5. Having regard to the circumstances of the case

and the situation now prevailing, apart from the

submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view

that the petitioners can be granted an opportunity to repay

the overdue amount in '15' instalments and thereafter, if

the amount so directed is repaid within the time as

directed above, to have the loan account regularised.

6. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the

respondent-Bank to accept repayment of the entire

overdue amount of Rs.40,61,300/- along with bank

charges from the petitioners and to regularise the loan

account of the petitioners on the following conditions:

(i). The overdue amount of Rs.40,61,300/-

shall be repaid in '15' equated monthly

instalments.

(ii). The first instalment shall be paid on or

before 22.12.2021.

(iii). Petitioners shall continue to pay the WP(C) NO. 27052 OF 2021

regular EMI's along with the instalments

directed above.

(iv). In the event of default of any one

instalment, the respondent bank shall be

entitled to proceed in accordance with law.

(v) In order to enable the petitioners to

repay the entire amounts, all coercive

proceedings shall be kept in abeyance.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE AJM WP(C) NO. 27052 OF 2021

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 27052/2021

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 02.04.2019.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 23.11.2021 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT.

Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EVICTION NOTICE SERVED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DATED 08.02.2021 IN CMP NO. 694 /2020.

Exhibit P4 THE COPY OF THE PAYMENT RECEIPT DATED 08.02.2021.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL

//TRUE COPY//

PA TO JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter