Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23420 Ker
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.R.ANITHA
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 4671 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC 1602/2016 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF
FIRST CLASS , SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
1 SHEFEEK
AGED 36 YEARS
S/O. SALIM RAWTHER, MAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU,
THEKKEMURI, SOORANAD NORTH VILLAGE,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 522
2 SUBAIDA
AGED 56 YEARS
W/O. SALIM RAWTHER, MAVILA PUTHEN VEEDU,
THEKKEMURI, SOORANAD NORTH VILLAGE,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-690 522
BY ADVS.
K.SIJU
ANJANA KANNATH
RESPONDENT/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
SOORANAD POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM-690 522
3 REJINA BEEGOM
AGED 25 YEARS
D/O. ABDUL RAHMAN KUNJU,
KEERUVILA KIZHAKKATHIL, PADINJATTEKARA,
THEVALAKKARA, KARUNAGAPPALLY,
KOLLAM-690 524
BY ADV A.MUHAMMED RAFFI
BY ADV. SANGEETHARAJ N.R, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.MC NO. 4671 OF 2021
2
ORDER
This Crl.M.C. has been filed seeking to quash the entire
further proceedings in C.C.No.1602/2016 on the file of the Judicial
First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta, which arose out of
crime No.1783/2016 of Sooranadu police station registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 323, 406, 498A and 34 of the
Indian Penal Code.
2. Petitioners are accused persons in the above crime. The
first petitioner is the husband of the third respondent/defacto
complainant.
3. When the case came up for hearing, it has been
reported by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the
learned counsel for the defacto complainant, Sri.A.Muhammed Rafi
that the entire matrimonial issues between the parties have been
settled amicably. Annexure-1 is the copy of the private complaint.
Annexure-2 is the copy of the FIR which was registered in
pursuance of Annexure-1 complaint. Annexure-3 is the copy of the
final report. Annexure-4 is the notary attested affidavit duly sworn
in by the defacto complainant.
CRL.MC NO. 4671 OF 2021
4. The learned Public Prosecutor produced copy of report
of the SHO along with copy of the statement of the defacto
complainant.
5. It has come out from the affidavit as well as the
statement of the defacto complainant given to the SHO that the
parties have amicably settled the entire issues out of court and
presently they are living together. The defacto complainant has no
surviving grievance against the petitioners.
6. Since the entire issues between the parties are purely
private in nature and no public interest is involved and they have
amicably settled the issues, continuance of the proceedings
against the petitioners would be an abuse of process of court.
In the result, Crl.M.C. allowed and all further proceedings
against the petitioners in C.C.No.1602/2016 on the file of the
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Sasthamcotta, which arose out
of crime No.1783/2016 of Sooranadu police station, is hereby
quashed.
Sd/-
M.R.ANITHA JUDGE nkr CRL.MC NO. 4671 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 4671/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
Annexure 1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF PRIVATE COMPLAINT DATED 9.11.2016
Annexure 2 THE COPY OF FIR IN CRIME NO.1783/2016 OF SOORANAD POLICE STATION DATED 12.11.2016
Annexure 3 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF FINAL REPORT IN CRIME 1783/2016 OF SOORANAD POLICE STATION DATED 13.12.2016
Annexure 4 THE AFFIDAVIT REGARDING SETTLEMENT SWORN BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT ON 16.09.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!