Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhilash Prasad vs State Of Kerala
2021 Latest Caselaw 23143 Ker

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23143 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2021

Kerala High Court
Abhilash Prasad vs State Of Kerala on 24 November, 2021
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                     PRESENT

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                                        &

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN

         WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1943

                            WP(CRL.) NO. 365 OF 2021

PETITIONER:

               ABHILASH PRASAD,
               AGED 31 YEARS,
               S/O.K.M.PRASAD,
               NILACKAL HOUSE, NJALBHAGOM MURI,
               KAVIYOOR VILLAGE, THIRUVALLA TALUK,
               PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 582.

               BY ADVS.
               P.HARIDAS
               BIJU HARIHARAN
               P.C.SHIJIN
               RISHIKESH HARIDAS



RESPONDENTS:

     1         STATE OF KERALA,
               REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY,
               DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS,
               GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
               TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

     2         DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
               POLICE HEAD QUARTERS,
               THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

     3         DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF KOTTAYAM,
               OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
               KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 002.

     4         DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
               VAIKOM,
               OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
               VAIKOM, PIN - 686 141.

     5         THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
               VAIKOM POLICE STATION, VAIKOM,
               PIN - 686 141.

     6         ANJANA NAIR,
               AGED 28 YEARS,
               D/O.SASIKUMAR, RAMANILAYAM,
               VAIKOM, UDAYANAPURAM P.O.,
 W.P.(Crl) No.365 of 2021

                                         2

              KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 143.


      7       SASIKUMAR,
              RAMANILAYAM,
              VAIKOM, UDAYANAPURAM P.O.,
              KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 143.

      8       SUKUMARI @ SUMA NAIR,
              W/O.SASIKUMAR,
              RAMANILAYAM,
              VAIKOM, UDAYANAPURAM P.O.,
              KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686 143.

              BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER


 OTHER PRESENT:

              SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN - SENIOR G.P




 THIS WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
 24.11.2021,      THE   COURT    ON      THE   SAME   DAY   DELIVERED   THE
 FOLLOWING:
 W.P.(Crl) No.365 of 2021

                                    3


        K.VINOD CHANDRAN & C.JAYACHANDRAN, JJ.
                ---------------------------------------
                   W.P(Crl.)No. 365 of 2021
                ---------------------------------------
          Dated this the 24th day of November, 2021


                              JUDGMENT

Jayachandran, J.

The petitioner, who is the father of the

alleged detenue, a minor boy aged three months, seeks

issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the

respondents to produce the minor before this Court and

to set him free in the custody of the petitioner. The

6th respondent is the wife of the petitioner and

respondents 7 and 8 are her parents.

2. It is alleged in the writ petition that the 6th

respondent was not willing to marry the petitioner and

that she was recalcitrant to bear a child. 6 th respondent

terminated her pregnancy without the permission of the

petitioner. She again become pregnant and tried to get

the same terminated. However, the same was averted by

the intervention of the petitioner and accordingly, a

male child by name "Ayansh" was born. However, the 6th

respondent left the petitioner to her parental home.

Neither the 6th respondent nor her parents want the child W.P.(Crl) No.365 of 2021

and the petitioner apprehends danger to the life of

child at the hands of respondents 6 to 8.

3. As per order dated 15.11.2021, we directed the

5th respondent to obtain a statement from the 6th

respondent. Accordingly, statement given by the 6th

respondent is produced before us. A perusal of the said

statement would indicate the matrimonial discord between

the petitioner and the 6th respondent and that she had

left her native place along with her child and parents

in pursuit of a job.

4. We find no illegal detention of the minor

child, as the child is with his biological mother.

In the circumstances, we dismiss the instant

writ petition, relegating the petitioner to pursue his

remedies, if any, before the Family Court concerned.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN JUDGE

Sd/-

C.JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE

NR/24/11/2021 W.P.(Crl) No.365 of 2021

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY DATED 21/10/2021.

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 08/11/2021.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter