Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 23114 Ker
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1943
CRL.MC NO. 5711 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 925/2015 OF SUB COURT AT PUNALUR, KOLLAM.,
KOLLAM
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3:
1 ANANDHAN
AGED 46 YEARS
S/O.BHASKARAN,
SARASWATHY BHAVANAM,
KIZHAKKUPADINJARE LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY,
ACHANKOVIL MURI, ARYANKAVU VILLAGE,
KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2 BHASKARAN,
AGED 78 YEARS
S/O.KARUTHAKUNJU,
SARASWATHY BHAVANAM,
KIZHAKKUPADINJARE LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY,
ACHANKOVIL MURI,
ARYANKAVU VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
3 SARASWATHY,
AGED 74 YEARS
W/O.BHASKARAN, SARASWATHY BHAVANAM,
KIZHAKKUPADINJARE LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONY,
ACHANKOVIL MURI, ARYANKAVU VILLAGE,
KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.
ALEXANDER GEORGE
ARCHANA JOHN BRITTO
RESPONDENTS/STATE:
1 STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
THENMALA POLICE STATION,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-691308.
SR.PP - SRI. HRITHWIK C.S.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.11.2021, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C.No.5711 of 2021
2
ORDER
Petitioners are accused in S.C.No.925/2015 pending
before the Assistant Sessions Court, Punalur where they face
allegations under Sections 332 and 308 read with Section 34 of the
IPC and Section 117(g) of the Kerala Police Act . Inviting attention to
the Annexure-1 case status of the court, the learned counsel pointed
out that till 08.01.2021, the petitioners were regularly present and
thereafter due to lock down related issues there was no regular sitting
in the court. Later on 26.07.2021, they were absent but there was
representation for them. On 27.08.2021, they could not be present
and non-bailable warrants have been issued.
2. Learned counsel submits that they belong to Achankovil,
which is about 43 kilometers away from the court house, that in order
to reach the place they will have to travel via Chenkotta in Tamil
Nadu; they live in areas; petitioners two and three are septuagenarians
and now warrants of arrest have been issued besides M.C.Nos.6/2021,
7/2021 and 8/2021 are registered against them, that non-bailable
warrants are pending against them.
Crl.M.C.No.5711 of 2021
3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the
learned Senior Public Prosecutors.
4. The case status does not indicate that M.Cs were
registered after issuing notice to the sureties. It is also not possible to
infer from Annexure-A1 that bail has been cancelled and bail bonds
have been forfeited. The learned counsel undertakes that the
petitioners are prepared to co-operate with the trial. If their bail is not
cancelled, the petitioners shall file application for recalling warrant
and on that event that shall be considered on the same day of filing the
petition. It does not seem that since the case is ripe for trial, custodial
trial is warranted. Therefore, the petitioner shall surrender before
court at the earliest; if application for recalling warrant or seeking
fresh bail is filed, it shall be considered on the very day of filing the
same.
The Crl.M.C is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
K.HARIPAL
JUDGE
Jms/24.11 Crl.M.C.No.5711 of 2021
APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5711/2021
PETITIONER ANNEXURE Annexure 1 TRUE COPY OF THE B-DIARY PROCEEDINGS FROM 21.02.2017 TO 27.09.2021 IN SC NO.925/2015 PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE, PUNALUR.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!